Local Knowledge as Illiterate Rhetoric: An Antenarrative Approach to Enacting Socially Just Technical Communication

Abstract

In this article, I focus on two competing technical communication discourses used to represent the biometric technology Ghana adopted in 2012 and subsequent elections to demonstrate how communication about technology could potentially marginalize local, nondominant knowledge systems whereas it privileges global, dominant knowledge systems. Representation of the biometric technology, therefore, reflects ways that technical communication can become complicit in silencing, excluding, and marginalizing local voices. I call attention to how communication that focuses on dominant narratives obscures and delegitimizes the knowledge of disenfranchised and less privileged groups.

Keywords

social justice antenarrative local knowledge biometric technology Ghana dismissive rhetoric

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agboka

(2012). Liberating Intercultural Technical Communication from “Large Culture” Ideologies: Constructing Culture Discursively. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.42.2.e

Agboka

(2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.730966

Agboka

(2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297–327. http://doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.3.e

Agboka

G. Y.

(2021). “Subjects” in and of research: Decolonizing oppressive rhetorical practices in technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(2), 159–174. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620901484

Banks

A. J.

(2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: searching for higher ground. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://books.google.com/books?id=ubAOAs4doHwC

Barton

B. F.

Barton

M. S.

(2004). Ideology and the Map: Toward a postmordern visual design practice. In Johnson-Eilola

Selber

S. A.

(Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 232–252). Oxford University Press.

Berkenkotter

(n.d.). Analyzing Everyday Texts in Organizational Settings. In Research in Technical Communication (pp. 47–66). Praeger.

Boje

D. M.

(2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. SAGE Publications.

Bridgewater

(2018). Ethos in electoral technology company web spaces. Technical Communication, 65(4), 422–431.

10.

Canagarajah

(2002). Reconstructing local knowledge. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(4), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0104_1

11.

Cheeseman

Lynch

Willis

(2018). Digital dilemmas: The unintended consequences of election technology. Democratization, 25(8), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1470165

12.

Ding

Haigler

A. C.

(2016). Access, oppression, and social (in) justice in epidemic control: Race, profession, and communication in SARS outbreaks in Canada and Singapore. Connexions: International Professional Communication Journal, 4(1), 21–55.

13.

Dorpenyo

I. K.

(2019). Risky election, vulnerable technology: Localizing biometric use in elections for the sake of justice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1610502

14.

Dorpenyo

I. K.

(2020). User localization strategies in the face of technological breakdown: Biometric in Ghana’s elections. Springer International Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?id=JvXIzQEACAAJ

15.

Frazer

J. G.

(1995). The golden bough: a study in magic and religion. Simon & Schuster. https://books.google.com/books?id=pRDqoO\_5HhEC

16.

Frost

E. A.

(2013). Transcultural risk communication on dauphin island: An analysis of ironically located responses to the deepwater horizon disaster. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.726483

17.

Goodall

H. L. J.

(2000). Writing the New ethnography. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

18.

Haas

A. M.

(2012). Race, Rhetoric, and Technology: A Case Study of Decolonial Technical Communication Theory, Methodology, and Pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439539

19.

Haas

A. M.

Eble

M. F.

(2018). Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century. Utah State University Press.

20.

Hobbis

S. K.

Hobbis

(2017). Voter Integrity, Trust and the Promise of Digital Technologies: Biometric Voter Registration in Solomon Islands. Paper presented at the Anthropological Forum.

21.

Johnson

R. R.

(n.d.). User-centered technology: a rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. State University of New York Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=ejRuBt4uV20C

22.

Jones

Walton

(2018). Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In Haas

A. M.

Eble

M. F.

(Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 241–267). Utah State University Press.

23.

Jones

N. N.

(2016). The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472

24.

Jones

N. N.

Williams

M. F.

(2018). Technologies of disenfranchisement: Literacy tests and black voters in the US from 1890 to 1965. Technical Communication, 65(4), 371–386.

25.

Jones

N. N.

Moore

K. R.

Walton

(2016). Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655

26.

Katz

S. B.

(1992). The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust. College English, 54(3), 255. https://doi.org/10.2307/378062

27.

Lawrence

H. Y.

(2014). Healthy Bodies, Toxic Medicines: College Students and the Rhetorics of Flu Vaccination. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 87(4), 423–437.

28.

Magnet

(2011). When biometrics fail: Gender, race, and the technology of identity. Duke University Press.

29.

McKeon

(2009). The basic works of Aristotle. Random House Publishing Group. https://books.google.com/books?id=EwT0yTR0y1MC

30.

Mukherjee

Williams

M. G.

(2016). Branding authenticity, global–localization and technology. Professional Communication, Social Justice, and the Global South, 4(1), 91–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.21310/cnx.4.1.16muketal

31.

Murray

(2007). Monstrous play in negative spaces: Illegible bodies and the cultural construction of biometric technology. The Communication Review, 10(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420701715415

32.

Petersen

E. J.

Moeller

R. M.

(2016). Using antenarrative to uncover systems of power in mid-20th century policies on marriage and maternity at IBM. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639473

33.

Poole

M. S.

Folger

J. P.

(1981). A Method for Establishing the Representational Validity of Interaction Coding Systems: Do We See What They See? Human Communication Research, 8(1), 26–42.

34.

Rockquemore

Laszloffy

T. A.

(2008). The black academic’s guide to winning tenure--without losing your soul. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

35.

Rose

E. J.

(2016). Design as Advocacy: Using a Human-Centered Approach to Investigate the Needs of Vulnerable Populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653494

36.

Rude

C. D.

(2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651908329562

37.

Sanchez

(2018). Racial gerrymandering and geographic information systems: Subverting the 2011 Texas district map with election technologies. Technical Communication, 65(4), 354–370.

38.

Scott

J. B.

(2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Southern Illinois University Press.

39.

Scott

J. B.

Longo

Wills

K. V.

(2007). Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. State University of New York Press.

40.

Seigel

(2013). The rhetoric of pregnancy. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=bVAFAgAAQBAJ

41.

Simmons

W. M.

Grabill

J. T.

(2007). Toward a civic rhetoric for technologically and scientifically Complex places: Invention, performance, and participation. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 419–448.

42.

Smith

B. Q.

(2012). Reading and writing in the global workplace: gender, literacy, and outsourcing in Ghana. Lexington Books. https://books.google.com/books?id=h9QAeXZQ1OIC

43.

Stevenson

(2010). Oxford Dictionary of English (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

44.

Sun

(2006). The Triumph of Users: Achieving Cultural Usability Goals with User Localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 457–481.

45.

Thatcher

(2010). Editor introduction: Eight needed developments and eight critical contexts for global inquiry. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 1(1), 1–34. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/rpcg/vol1/iss1/1

46.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. http://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

47.

Walton

(2014). Editor’s Introduction to the special edition on methodology. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5(1), 1–13. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/rpcg/vol5/iss1/1

48.

Walton

R. W.

Moore

K. R.

Jones

N. N.

(2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: building coalitions for action. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=SY2ZwgEACAAJ

49.

White

M. D.

Marsh

E. E.

(2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45.

50.

Wolf

(2020). The Role of Voter Education in Voter Registration Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/role-voter-education-voter-registration