Getting the Picture: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Chinese and Western Users’ Preferences for Image Types in Manuals for Household Appliances

Abstract

Research shows that Western and Chinese user instructions use visuals differently. Two basic tendencies may be discerned: Chinese manuals place more emphasis on visuals and their selection of visuals is less strictly confined to usability related functionality. This study investigates whether such cultural differences correspond to user preferences. Three hypotheses were tested: (a) Chinese users value pictures more than Western users; (b) Chinese users appreciate diverting, cartoon-like pictures more than Western users; and (c) Western users appreciate strictly instrumental pictures more than Chinese users. To test these hypotheses, a quasi-experiment (N = 158) was conducted with cultural background as independent variable and appreciation for pictures as dependent variable. All participants rated 15 pictures, which were presented in the context of user instructions. All three hypotheses were confirmed. Cultural differences regarding the use of visuals should therefore be taken into account when localizing Western manuals for the Chinese market, or vice versa.

Keywords

cross-cultural communication cultural differences usability user experience user instructions visuals

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnum

C. M.

(2006). Chinese and American technical communication: A cross-cultural comparison of differences. Technical Communication, 53(2), 143–166.

Carroll

Delin

(1998). Written instructions in Japanese and English: A comparative analysis. Pragmatics, 8(3), 339–385.

Chan

C. S. R.

Park

H. D.

(2015). How images and color in business plans influence venture investment screening decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 732–748.

De Jong

M. D. T.

Yang

Karreman

(2017). The image of user instructions: Comparing users’ expectations of and experiences with an official and a commercial software manual. Technical Communication, 64(1), 38–49.

Desnoyers

(2011). Toward a taxonomy of visuals in science communication. Technical Communication, 58(2), 119–134.

Fukuoka

Kojima

Spyridakis

J. H.

(1999). Illustrations in user manuals: Preference and effectiveness with Japanese and American readers. Technical Communication, 46(2), 167–176.

Ganier

(2004). Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: Implications for document design. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(1), 15–26.

Gellevij

Van der Meij

(2004). Empirical proof for presenting screen captures in software documentation. Technical Communication, 51(2), 224–238.

Gellevij

Van der Meij

De Jong

Pieters

J. M.

(2002). Multimodal versus unimodal instruction in a complex learning context. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(3), 215–239.

10.

Gigante

M. E.

(2012). Accommodating scientific illiteracy: Award-winning visualizations on the covers of Science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(1), 21–38.

11.

Haaksma

T. R.

De Jong

M. D. T.

Karreman

(2018). Users’ personal conceptions of usability and user experience of electronic and software products. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(2), 116–132.

12.

Hall

E. T.

(1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

13.

Harrison, S. M. (1995). A comparison of still, animated, or nonillustrated on-line help with written or spoken instructions in a graphical user interface. In I. R. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson, & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 82–89). New York, NY: ACM.

14.

Hart

P. S.

Feldman

(2016). The impact of climate change-related imagery and text on public opinion and behavior change. Science Communication, 38(4), 415–441.

15.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Hofstede

G. J.

Minkov

(2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

17.

Honold

(1999). Learning how to use a cellular phone: Comparison between German and Chinese users. Technical Communication, 46(2), 196–205.

18.

International Organization for Standardization. (1998). ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

19.

International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 9241-210. Ergonomic of human system interaction—Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

20.

Larkin

J. H.

Simon

H. A.

(1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100.

21.

Lazard

Atkinson

(2015). Putting environmental infographics center stage: The role of visuals at the elaboration likelihood model’s critical point of persuasion. Science Communication, 37(1), 6–33.

22.

De Jong

M. D. T.

Karreman

(2015). Cultural differences and user instructions: Effects of a culturally adapted manual structure on Western and Chinese users. Technical Communication, 62(3), 163–182.

23.

De Jong

M. D. T.

Karreman

(in press). Cultural differences between Chinese and Western user instructions: A content analysis of user manuals for household appliances. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(1).

24.

De Jong

M. D. T.

Karreman

(in press). Cultural differences and the structure of user instructions: Effects of Chinese and Western structuring principles on Chinese and Western users. Technical Communication, 68(1).

25.

Karreman

De Jong

M. D. T.

(2019). Inductively versus deductively structured product descriptions: Effects on Chinese and Western readers’ opinions and their ability to recall information. Manuscript in progress.

26.

Loorbach

Karreman

Steehouder

(2007). Adding motivational elements to an instruction manual for seniors. Effects on usability and motivation. Technical Communication, 54(3), 343–358.

27.

Loorbach

Karreman

Steehouder

(2013). Verification steps and personal stories in an instruction manual for seniors: Effects on confidence, motivation, and usability. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56(4), 294–312.

28.

Maes

A. A.

Lenting

(1999). How to put the instructive space into words. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(2), 100–113.

29.

Maylath

(2013). Current trends in translation. Communication & Language at Work, 2(2), 41–50.

30.

Mijksenaar

Westendorp

(1999). Open here: The art of instructional design. New York, NY: Stewart Tabori & Chang.

31.

Paivio

Csapo

(1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 176–206.

32.

Powell

T. E.

Boomgaarden

H. G.

De Swert

De Vreese

C. H.

(2015). A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997–1017.

33.

Risku

Pircher

(2008). Visual aspects of intercultural technical communication: A cognitive scientific and semiotic point of view. Meta, 53(1), 154–166.

34.

Schriver

K. A.

(1997). Dynamics in document design. Creating text for readers. New York, NY: John Wiley.

35.

Tenbrink

Maas

(2015). Efficiently connecting textual and visual information in operating instructions. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(4), 346–366.

36.

Trompenaars

Hampden-Turner

(1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Chicago, IL: Irwin Professional Publishing.

37.

Tufte

E. R.

(2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

38.

Van der Meij

Karreman

Steehouder

(2009). Three decades of research and professional practice on printed software tutorials for novices. Technical Communication, 56(3), 265–292.

39.

Van Hooijdonk

Krahmer

(2008). Information modalities for procedural instructions: The influence of text, pictures, and film clips on learning and executing RSI exercises. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51(1), 50–62.

40.

Wang

(2000). A cross-cultural comparison of the use of graphics in scientific and technical communication. Technical Communication, 47(4), 553–560.

41.

Wang

(2009). Cultural contexts in technical communication: A study of Chinese and German automobile literature. Technical Communication, 56(1), 39–50.

42.

Winn

(2014). Increasing accessibility with a visual sign system: A case study. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(4), 451–473.

43.

(2011). Visualizing banking and financial products: A comparative study of Chinese and American practices. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 41(3), 289–310.

44.

Zhu

St.Amant

(2007). Taking traditional Chinese medicine international and online: An examination of the cultural rhetorical factors affecting American perceptions of Chinese-created Web sites. Technical Communication, 54(2), 171–186.