Documenting and characterizing interactions between student interns and their mentors in the workplace offers perspective on student learning and enculturation that can help us introduce these ways of learning to students in the technical communication classroom, even before the internship. Three student intern conversations in the internship setting are the focus of this close discourse analysis, framed by 6-month-long case studies and Vygotsky’s learning theory. Results indicate that many similarities exist between classroom feedback and mentor feedback in the internship, but that differences in student agency may make negotiation important in the technical communication classroom.
BlochJ. (2011) Glorified grammarian or versatile value adder? What internship reports reveal about the professionalization of technical communication. Technical Communication58(4): 308–327.
2.
BourelleT. (2012) Bridging the gap between the technical communication classroom and the internship: Teaching social consciousness and real-world writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication42(2): 183–197. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/TW.42.2.f.
3.
BourelleT. (2014) New perspectives on the technical communication internship: Professionalism in the workplace. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication44(2): 171–189. doi:10.2190/TW.44.2.d.
4.
BrannonL.KnoblauchC. H. (1982) On students’ rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication33(2): 157–166. doi:10.2307/357623.
5.
ChristiansenM. S.BlochJ. (2016) Papers are never finished, just abandoned: The role of written teacher comments in the revision process. Journal of Response to Writing2(1): 6–42.
6.
ConradS. M.GoldsteinL. M. (1999) ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing8(2): 147–179. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X.
7.
DiasP.FreedmanA.MedwayP.ParA. (1999) Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
FerrisD. R.LiuH.SinhaH.SennaM. (2013) Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing22: 307–329. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009.
9.
FreedmanA.AdamC. (1996) Learning to write professionally: “Situated learning” and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication10(4): 395–342.
10.
GoldsteinL. (2006) Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In: HylandK.HylandF. (eds) Feedback in second language writing, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–205.
HughesM. A.HayhoeG. F. (2008) A research primer for technical communication: Methods, exemplars and analyses, New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HylandK.HylandF. (2006) Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In: HylandF.HylandK. (eds) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–224.
14.
JenningsA. (2012) Technical communication practitioner-student interaction: An opportunity for students to learn from the practitioners’ world of work. Technical Communication59(4): 324–333.
15.
KatzS. M. (2015) Making the most of your internship program. Programmatic Perspectives7(1): 43–66.
16.
KimE. J. (2015) “I don’t understand what you’re saying!”: Lessons from three ESL writing tutorials. Journal of Response to Writing1(1): 47–76.
17.
KohnL. (2015) How professional writing pedagogy and university workplace partnerships can shape the mentoring of workplace writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication45(2): 166–188. doi:10.1177/0047281615569484.
18.
Kramer-Simpson, E. (2016). Moving from student to professional: Industry mentors and academic internship coordinators supporting intern learning in the workplace. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. doi:10.1177/0047281616646753.
19.
LeeG.SchallertD. L. (2008) Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing17(3): 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002.
20.
LeeI. (2008) Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing17: 144–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001.
21.
MungerR. (2006) Participating in a technical communication internship. Technical Communication53(3): 326–338.
22.
MurphyS. (2000) A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room?Assessing Writing7(1): 79–90. doi:10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00019-2.
23.
NewkirkT. (1995) The writing conference as performance. Research in the Teaching of English29(2): 193–215.
24.
PriorP. (1995) Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: A case study of response, revision and disciplinary enculturation. Research in the Teaching of English29(3): 288–325.
25.
SappD. A.ZhangQ. (2009) Trends in industry supervisors’ feedback on business communication internships. Business Communication Quarterly72(3): 274–288. doi:10.1177/1080569909336450.
26.
SidesC.MrvicaA. (2007) Internships: Theory and practice, Amityville, NY: Baywood.
27.
SperlingM.FreedmanS. W. (1987) A good girl writes like a good girl: Written response to student writing. Written Communication4(4): 343–369. doi:10.1177/0741088387004004002.
28.
SommersN. (1982) Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication33(2): 148–156. doi:10.2307/357622.
29.
St. AmantK. (2003) Expanding internships to enhance academic-industry relations: A perspective in stakeholder education. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication33(3): 231–241. doi:10.2190/MBJF-PW01-EJ9D-5QT0.
30.
StraubR. (1997) Students’ reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English31(1): 91–119.
31.
TardyC. M. (2006) Appropriation, ownership and agency: Negotiating teacher feedback in academic settings. In: HylandK.HylandF. (eds) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–78.
32.
TaylorS. S. (2011) “I really don’t know what he meant by that”: How well do Engineering students understand teachers’ comments on their writing. Technical Communication Quarterly20(2): 139–166. doi:10.1080/10572252.2011.548762.
33.
ToveyJ. (2001) Building connections between industry and university: Implementing an internship program at a regional university. Technical Communication Quarterly10(2): 225–238. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1002_7.
34.
VygotskyL. (1978) Mind in society, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WilsonK.DevereuxL. (2014) Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in academic language and learning (ALL) contexts. Journal of Academic Language & Learning8(3): A91–A100.
36.
YehC. (2016) EFL college students’ experiences and attitudes towards teacher-student writing conferences. Journal of Response to Writing2(2): 37–65.
