FleckensteinK. S.SpinuzziC.RicklyR. J.PapperC. C. (2008) The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for writing research. College Composition and Communication60: 388–419.
2.
HardingS. (1987) Is there a feminist method? In: HardingS. (ed.) Feminism and methodology, Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–14.
3.
LawJ. (2004) After method: Mess in social science research, New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
MaxwellJ. C. (2007) Failing forward, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
5.
Rickly, R. J. (2006). [Research methods course standard practices]. Unpublished raw survey data.
6.
SmagorinskyP. (2008) The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication25(3): 389–411.
7.
TakayoshiP.TomlinsonE.CastilloJ. (2012) The construction of research problems & methods. In: PowellK. M.TakayoshiP. (eds) Practicing research in writing studies: Reflexive and ethically responsible research, New York, NY: Hampton Press, pp. 97–121.
8.
WilliamsonM. M.BrianH. (2012) A modest proposal for common ground and language for research in writing. In: PowellK. M.TakayoshiP. (eds) Practicing Research in Writing Studies: Reflexive and Ethically Responsible Research, New York, NY: Hampton Press, pp. 31–57.