BeaufortA. (2000) Learning the trade: A social apprenticeship model for gaining writing expertise. Written Communication17(2): 185–223.
2.
CarterM.FerzliM.WiebeE. N. (2007) Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication21(3): 278–302.
3.
CushmanJ. (2015) Write me a better story: Writing stories as a diagnostic and repair practice for automotive technicians. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication45(2): 189–208.
4.
DetweilerJ. (2008) To design a doctor(ate): Negotiating professional identities in a new clinical-doctoral program. In: HeifferonB.BrownS. C. (eds) The rhetoric of healthcare: Essays toward a new disciplinary inquiry, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 221–242.
5.
FlanaginA. J.WaldeckJ. H. (2004) Technology use and organizational newcomer socialization. Journal of Business Communication41(2): 137–165.
6.
FountainT. K. (2014) Rhetoric in the flesh: Trained vision, technical expertise, and the gross anatomy lab, New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
HaasC.WitteS. P. (2001) Writing as an embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication15(4): 413–457.
8.
HawkB. (2004) Toward a post-technê—Or, inventing pedagogies for professional writing. Technical Communication Quarterly13(4): 371–392.
9.
KeränenL. (2001) The hippocratic oath as epideictic rhetoric: Reanimating medicine’s past for its future. Journal of Medical Humanities22: 55–68.
10.
LarsonM. (1996) Patterns in transition: A writing teacher’s survey of organizational socialization. Journal of Business and Technical Communication10(3): 352–368.
11.
LingardL.HaberR. J. (1999) Teaching and learning communication in medicine: A rhetorical approach. Academic Medicine74(5): 507–510.
12.
MelonconL. (2013) Toward a theory of technological embodiment. In: MelonconL. (ed.) Rhetorical accessibility: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies, Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing, pp. 67–83.
13.
MilesK. S. (2009) Re-conceptualizing analysis and invention in a post-technê classroom: A comparative study of technical communication students. Technical Communication Quarterly19(1): 47–68.
14.
NetterF. H. (2014) Atlas of human anatomy, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
15.
NewmanS. (2009) Gestural enthymemes: Delivering movement in 18th and 19th century medical images. Written Communication26(3): 273–294.
16.
RiversN. A. (2011) Future convergences: Technical communication research as cognitive science. Technical Communication Quarterly20(4): 412–442.
17.
Sauer, B. (2002). The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
18.
SegalJ. Z. (2005) Health and the rhetoric of medicine, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP.
19.
SchryerC. F.LingardL.SpaffordM. (2007) Reguliarized practices: Genres, improvisation, and identity formation in health-care professions. In: ZachryM.ThrallsC. (eds) Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations, Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 21–44.
20.
SullivanD.MartinM. S.AndersonE. R. (2003) Moving from the periphery: Conceptions of ethos, reputation, and identity for the technical communicator. In: Kynell-HuntT.SavageG. (eds) Power and legitimacy in technical communication. Volume I: The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status, Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 115–136.
21.
TestonC. (2012) Moving from artifact to action: A grounded investigation of visual displays of evidence during medical deliberations. Technical Communication Quarterly21(1): 187–209.
22.
ZerbeM. (2004) ‘What’s up, doc?’ Approaching medicine as a cultural institution in the technical communication classroom by studying the discourses of standard and alternative cancer treatments. In: BridgefordT.KitalongK.SelfD. (eds) Innovative approaches to technical communication, Logan, UT: Utah State University Press, pp. 183–196.
