My Career and the “Rhetoric of” Technical Writing and Communication

Berkenkotter C. (2008) Patient tales: Case histories and the used of narrative in psychiatry, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

Blicq R. S. Moretto L. (2003) Technically-write!, 6th ed. London, England: Pearson Longman.

Britt E. C. (2001) Conceiving normalcy: Rhetoric, law, and the double binds of infertility, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

Buchanan L. (2013) Rhetorics of motherhood, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Buchnell J. (1999) A contrary view of the technical writing classroom: Notes toward future discussion. Technical Communication Quarterly 8: 175–188.

Houp K. W. Pearsall T. E. Tebeauz E. Dragga S. (2005) Reporting technical information, 11th ed. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kenny Fountain T. (2014) Rhetoric in the flesh: Trained vision, technical expertise, and the gross anatomy lab, New York, NY: ATTW Routledge/Taylor Francis.

Koerber A. (2013) Breast or bottle: Contemporary controversies in infant-feeding policy and practice, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

LaDuc L. Goldrick-Jones A. (1994) The critical eye, the gendered lens, and “situated” insights—Feminist contributions to professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 3: 245–256.

Latour B. Woolgar S. (1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.

Lay M. M. (1989) Interpersonal conflict in collaborative writing: What we can learn from gender studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 3: 5–28.

Lay M. M. (2000) The rhetoric of midwifery: Gender, knowledge, and power, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Lay, M. M., & Karis, W. (Eds.). (1991). Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.

Losano, W. A. (1979). Comparative analysis and audience levels. In M. Whitburn (Ed.), Teaching technical writing: The first day in the technical writing course (Anthology No. 3, pp. 17–21). Retrieved from http://www.attw.org/sites/default/files/Whitburn-FirstDay-ATTW-1979.pdf.

Miller C. R. (1979) A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English 40: 610–617.

Sauer B. (1993) Sense and sensibility in technical documentation: How feminist interpretation strategies can save lives in the nation’s mines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 7: 63–83.

Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. (2006). WATCH victim impact statement study. Retrieved from http://038d538.netsolhost.com/watchwordpress1/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/WATCH-VIS-Final-.pdf.

Schuster M. L. Propen A. D. (2011) Victim advocacy in the courtroom: Persuasive practices in domestic violence and child protection cases, Lebanon, NY: University Press of New England/Northeastern University Press Series on Gender, Crime, and Law.

Scott J. B. (2003) Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Segal J. Z. (2005) Health and the rhetoric of medicine, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Seigal M. (2014) The rhetoric of pregnancy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. D. (2011a). Degrees of emotion: Judicial responses to victim impact statements. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 6, 75–104.

Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. D. (2011b). Victim advocacy in the courtroom: Persuasive practices in domestic violence and child protection cases. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press Series on Gender, Crime, and Law by University Press of New England.

Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. D. (2015). Expanding our understanding of kairos: Tracing moral panic and risk perception in the debate over the Minnesota sex offender program. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45, 3–30.

Schuster, M. L., Russell, A. L. B., Bartels, D. M., & Kelly-Trombley, H. (2013). “Standing in Terri Schiavo’s shoes”: The role of genre in end-of-life decision making. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 195–218.

Schuster, M. L., Russell, A. L. B., Bartels, D. M., & Kelly-Trombley, H. (2014). Determining ‘best interests’ in end-of-life decisions for the developmentally disabled: Minnesota state guardians and wards. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34. Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4276.