A field’s identity and sustainability depend on its research as well as on programs, practice, and infrastructure. Research and practice have a reciprocal relationship, with practice identifying research questions and researchers answering those questions to improve practice. Technical communication research also has an exploratory purpose, using the knowledge and methods of the field to explain how texts work in a variety of contexts. A gap between research and practice developed in the 1990s. Defining explicitly how the parts of our research and our practice connect to form a whole will give the field a stronger identity
AndersenR. (2011) Component content management: Shaping the discourse through innovation diffusion research and reciprocity. Technical Communication Quarterly20: 384–411.
2.
AndrewsD.BernhardtS. A.CookK. C.GrabillJ.MaylathB.RiordanD.SelberS. A. (2014) Tracing the intellectual trajectories of professional/technical/scientific communication: A roundtable perspective from seven CPTSC past presidents. In: BridgefordT.KitalongK. S.WilliamsonB. (eds) Sharing our intellectual traces: Narrative reflections from administrators of professional, technical, and scientific, communication programs, Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 11–37.
3.
Benevente, S., Rude, C., & Hart-Davidson, B. (2013, May). Results of the April 2013 technical communication industry research needs survey. CIDM Information Management News. Retrieved from www.infomanagementcenter.com/enewsletter/2013/201305/third.htm.
Bridgeford, T., & St. Amant, K. (Eds). (2014). Academy-industry relationships and partnerships: Perspectives for technical communicators. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
6.
ConnorsR. J. (1982) The rise of technical writing instruction in America. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication12: 329–352.
7.
CunninghamD. H. (2004) The founding of ATTW and its journal. Technical Communication Quarterly13: 121–130.
8.
DaytonD.HopperK. (2010) Single sourcing and content management: A survey of STC members. Technical Communication57: 375–397.
9.
deJongM. D. T. (2009) Practically meaningful academic research and academically relevant practitioner research. Technical Communication56: 97–98.
10.
deJongM. D. T. (2010) Developments in technical communication: Journal articles between 2006 and 2010. Technical Communication57: 373–374.
11.
Kynell-Hunt, T., & Savage, G. J. (Eds). (2003). Power and legitimacy in technical communication, Vol. I: The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
12.
Kynell-Hunt, T., & Savage, G. J. (Eds). (2004). Power and legitimacy in technical communication, Vol. II: Strategies for professional status. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
13.
MaloneE. A. (2011) The first wave (1953–1961) of the professionalization movement in technical communication. Technical Communication58: 285–306.
14.
MirelB.SpilkaR. (2002) Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century, New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
Odell, L., & Goswami, D. (Eds). (1986). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
RudeC. D. (2009) Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication23: 174–215.
17.
SoutherJ. W. (1985) What to report. IEEE Transactions on Professional CommunicationPC28: 5–8.
18.
Technical Communication Body of Knowledge (TCBoK). (n.d.) Retrieved from www.tcbok.org.
19.
RudeC. D. (1995) The report for decision making: Genre and inquiry. Journal of Business and Technical Communication9: 170–205.
20.
RudeC. D. (2004) Toward a definition of best practices in policy discourse. In: Kynell-HuntT.SavageG. J. (eds) Power and legitimacy in technical communication: Strategies for professional statusVol II, Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 123–142.
21.
RudeC. D. (2004) Toward an expanded concept of rhetorical delivery: The uses of reports in public policy debates. Technical Communication Quarterly13: 271–288.
22.
RudeC. D. (2009) Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication23: 174–215.
23.
RudeC. D. (2015) Technical communication. In: HeilkerP.VandenbergP. (eds) Keywords in writing studies, Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press, pp. 165–168.
