Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite numerous European Union policy frameworks aimed at approximating countries of Eastern Europe to the European Union, the latter routinely distances itself from the region, actively (re)constructing Europe’s others. This article analyses the reactions of the European Council and the European Parliament to the 2020 crackdown on civilian protests in Belarus through a close reading of 25 press releases issued between May and November 2020, complemented by a retroactive reading in light of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and Belarus’s complicity in the war. The reading is combined with an analysis of Belarus’s position within Europe’s symbolic geography and the consequences this position entails for the European Union’s response. Although the European Council and European Parliament initially differed in their reactions, their discourses ultimately converged and culminated in European Union sanctions. Across both institutional narratives, Belarus is consistently rendered and reified as non-Europe while simultaneously constructed as Europe’s other.

Keywords

Belarus civic protests European Union othering sanctions symbolic geography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amnesty International (2020) Belarus 2020 Archives. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/europe-and-central-asia/belarus/report-belarus/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

Ash

(2020) Flat ontology and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography 10(3): 345–61.

Axyonova

Lozka

(2023) We are at war: reflections on positionality and research as negotiation in post-2022 Ukraine. Journal of International Relations and Development 26: 711–21.

Bajtay

(2015) Democratic and efficient foreign policy? Parliamentary diplomacy and oversight in the 21st century and the post-Lisbon role of the European Parliament in shaping and controlling EU foreign policy. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Research Paper No 11. Fiesole: European University Institute.

Bekus

(2010) Struggle Over Identity: The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness”. Budapest: CEU Press.

Bekus

(2021) Echo of 1989? Protest imaginaries and identity dilemmas in Belarus. Slavic Review 80(1): 4–14.

Bekus

(2023) Reassembling society in a Nation-State: history, language, and identity discourses of Belarus. Nationalities Papers 51(1): 98–113.

Bettiol

(2023) In and Out of Belarus: The dissidents will not give up. New Eastern Europe. Available at: https://neweasterneurope.eu/2023/01/31/in-and-out-of-belarus-the-dissidents-will-not-give-up/

Boatcă

(2010) Multiple Europes and the politics of difference within. In: Brunkhorst

Grozinger

(eds) The Study of Europe. Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp.51–66.

10.

Boatcă

(2021) Thinking Europe otherwise: lessons from the Caribbean. Current Sociology 69(3): 389–414.

11.

Bodnar

Grzelak

(2023) The Polish-Belarusian border crisis and the (Lack of) European Union response. Bialostockie Studia Prawnicze 28: 57–73.

12.

Böröcz

(2001) Introduction: empire and coloniality in the “Eastern enlargement” of the European Union. In: Böröcz

(ed.) Empire’s New Clothes: Unveiling EU Enlargement. Telford: Central Europe Review, pp.4–50.

13.

Browning

(2003) The region-building approach revisited: the continued othering of Russia in discourses of region-building in the European North. Geopolitics 8(1): 45–71.

14.

Burlyuk

Musliu

(2023) The responsibility to remain silent? On the politics of knowledge production, expertise and (self-) reflection in Russia’s war against Ukraine. Journal of International Relations and Development 69(4): 605–618.

15.

Buzgalin

Kolganov

(2021) The protests in Belarus: context, causes and lessons. Critical Sociology 47(3): 441–53.

16.

Cianciara

(2023) De-bordering and re-bordering the European Union after the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Studia Europejskie 27(4): 41–56.

17.

Charter97 (2020) Belarusian Opposition Demands to Annul Election Results. Available at: https://charter97.org/en/news/2020/9/10/392685/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

18.

Council of the EU (2020a) Belarus: EU Imposes Third Round of Sanctions Over Ongoing Repression. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/12/17/belarus-eu-imposes-third-round-of-sanctions-over-ongoing-repression/ (accessed 21 May 2025).

19.

Council of the EU (2020b) Belarus: Alexander Lukashenko and 14 Other Officials Sanctioned Over Ongoing Repression. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/11/06/belarus-alexandr-lukashenko-and-14-other-officials-sanctioned-over-ongoing-repression/ (accessed 16 April 2025).

20.

Council of the EU (2020c) Belarus: EU Imposes Third Round of Sanctions Over Ongoing Repression. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/12/17/belarus-eu-imposes-third-round-of-sanctions-over-ongoing-repression/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

21.

Council of the EU (2021) EU Bans Belarusian Carriers from Its Airspace and Airports. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2021/06/04/eu-bans-belarusian-carriers-from-its-airspace-and-airports/ (accessed 27 May 2025).

22.

Council of the EU (2022) Russia’s Military Aggression against Ukraine: EU Imposes Sanctions against President Putin and Foreign Minister Lavrov and Adopts Wide-ranging Individual and Economic Sanctions. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/02/25/russia-s-military-aggression-against-ukraine-eu-imposes-sanctions-against-president-putin-and-foreign-minister-lavrov-and-adopts-wide-ranging-individual-and-economic-sanctions/ (accessed 27 May 2025).

23.

Council of the EU (2024) Belarus: EU Prolongs Restrictive Measures for Another Year. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/26/belarus-eu-prolongs-restrictive-measures-for-another-year/ (accessed 17 May 2025).

24.

Dastanka

(2015) Multilateralism in Foreign policy of Belarus European and Eurasian dimension. Regional Formation and Development Studies 16(2): 16–23.

25.

Dastanka

(2017) The Republic of Belarus and the European Union: the main stages of the relationship. History of International Relations and Foreign Policy 476(4): 15–20.

26.

Dines

Rigoletto

(2012) Country cousins: Europeanness, sexuality and locality in contemporary Italian television. Modern Italy 17(4): 479–91.

27.

Dumitrescu

LȘ

Cristea

(2015) The European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood Today: Politics, Dynamics, Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

28.

Dutkiewicz

Smolenski

(2023) Epistemic superimposition: the war in Ukraine and the poverty of expertise in International Relations theory. Journal of International Relations and Development 26(4): 619–31.

29.

EEAS (2020) Delegation of the European Union to Belarus. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/belarus_en (accessed 10 May 2025).

30.

Emerson

Blockmans

(2021) Divided on Belarus: The EU’s Struggle for a Coherent Foreign Policy. CEPS Commentary, 23 August [Online]. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/divided-on-belarus/ (accessed 10 May 2025)

31.

European Council (2016) Council Conclusions on Belarus. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/02/15/fac-belarus-conclusions/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

32.

European Council (2020a) Remarks by President Charles Michel after the Eastern Partnership Leaders’ Video Conference. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/06/18/remarks-by-president-charles-michel-after-the-eastern-partnership-leaders-video-conference/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

33.

European Council (2020b) Invitation Letter by President Charles Michel to the Members of the European Council Ahead of Their Video Conference on 19 August 2020. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/08/17/invitation-letter-by-president-charles-michel-to-the-members-of-the-european-council-ahead-of-their-video-conference-on-19-august-2020/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

34.

European Council (2020c) Conclusions by the President of the European Council Following the Video Conference of the Members of the European Council on 19 August 2020. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/08/19/conclusions-by-the-president-of-the-european-council-following-the-video-conference-of-the-members-of-the-european-council-on-19-august-2020/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

35.

European Council (2020d) A Stronger and More Autonomous European Union Powering a Fairer World – Speech by President Charles Michel at the UN General Assembly. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/09/25/a-stronger-and-more-autonomous-european-union-powering-a-fairer-world-speech-by-president-charles-michel-at-the-un-general-assembly/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

36.

European Council (2020e) ‘Strategic Autonomy for Europe – the Aim of Our Generation’ – Speech by President Charles Michel to the Bruegel Think Tank. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/09/28/l-autonomie-strategique-europeenne-est-l-objectif-de-notre-generation-discours-du-president-charles-michel-au-groupe-de-reflexion-bruegel/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

37.

European Council (2020f) Remarks by Charles Michel after the Special European Council Meeting on 1 October 2020. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/10/02/remarks-by-president-charles-michel-after-the-special-european-council-meeting-on-1-october-2020/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

38.

European Parliament (2020a) Mcallister: European Parliament Supports the People of Belarus Demanding Change. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20200825IPR85602/mcallister-european-parliament-supports-the-people-of-belarus-demanding-change/ (accessed 10 May 20255).

39.

European Parliament (2020b) Belarus: Civil Society Urge the EU to Show Strong Support for the Protests. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20200904IPR86421/belarus-civil-society-urge-the-eu-to-show-strong-support-for-the-protests/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

40.

European Parliament (2020c) Meps Call for EU Sanctions against Belarusian President and Navalny’s Poisoners. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20200910IPR86829/meps-call-for-eu-sanctions-against-belarusian-president-and-navalny-s-poisoners/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

41.

European Parliament (2020d) The EU Must Undertake a Comprehensive Review of Its Relations with Belarus. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20200918IPR87426/the-eu-must-undertake-a-comprehensive-review-of-its-relations-with-belarus/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

42.

European Parliament (2020e) The 2020 Sakharov Prize Awarded to the Democratic Opposition in Belarus. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20201016IPR89546/the-2020-sakharov-prize-awarded-to-the-democratic-opposition-in-belarus/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

43.

European Parliament (2020f) The EU Needs to Comprehensively Review Its Relations with Belarus. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20201016IPR89554/the-eu-needs-to-comprehensively-review-its-relations-with-belarus/ (accessed 10 May 2025).

44.

Fokas

Karagiannis

(2015) Greek Identity and Europe: Entanglements and tensions. In: Spohn

Koenig

Knöbl

(eds) Religion and National Identities in an Enlarged Europe. Identities and Modernities in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp.68–95.

45.

Fonck

(2019) The European Parliament as a Diplomatic Mediator: Conceptualising, Exploring and Explaining Parliamentary Diplomacy in EU Foreign Policy. KU Leuven: Leuven International and European Studies.

46.

Gürkan

Tomini

(2020) The limits of the Europeanization research agenda. Decoding the reverse process in and around the EU. In: Brack

Gürkan

(eds) Theorising the Crisis of the European Union. London: Routledge, pp.183–203.

47.

Hendl

Burlyuk

O’Sullivan

, et al. (2024) (En)Countering epistemic imperialism: a critique of “Westsplaining” and coloniality in dominant debates on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy 45(2): 171–209.

48.

Herszenhorn

(2020) Belarus opposition leader calls on EU to do more. POLITICO. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/belarus-opposition-leader-svetlana-tikhanovskaya-calls-on-eu-to-do-more/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

49.

Ioffe

(2003) Understanding Belarus: Belarussian Identity. Europe-Asia Studies 55(8): 1241–72.

50.

Ioffe

(2014) Reassessing Lukashenka: Belarus in Cultural and Geopolitical Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

51.

Jachovič

(2022) Reinforcing the national identity: Belarusian identity-building social practices. Journal on Baltic Security 8(2): 3–40.

52.

Jachovič

(2023) The Reconstruction of Belarusian National Identity: Discourses and Processes, 2014–2019. Doctoral dissertation, Vilniaus Universitetas, Kmezic.

53.

Kazharski

(2021) Belarus’ new political nation? 2020 anti-authoritarian protests as identity building. New Perspectives 29(1): 69–79.

54.

Kmežić

Kadribasic

Misev

, et al. (2014) Europeanization by Rule of Law Implementation in the Western Balkans. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2437800 (accessed 4 June 2025).

55.

Korosteleva

(2017) Eastern partnership: bringing “the political” back in. East European Politics 33(3): 321–37.

56.

Krastev

(2022) Reimagining the East-West divide in Europe. IWMpost. Available at: https://www.iwm.at/publication/iwmpost-article/reimagining-the-east-west-divide-in-europe

57.

Kurylo

(2023) The Ukrainian subject, hierarchies of knowledge production and the everyday: an autoethnographic narrative. Journal of International Relations and Development 26: 685–97.

58.

Kuus

(2004) Europe’s eastern expansion and the reinscription of otherness in East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography 28(4): 472–89.

59.

Latipov

Lau

Mahlstein

, et al. (2022) The economic effects of potential EU tariff sanctions on Russia – a sectoral approach. Intereconomics 57(5): 294–305.

60.

Lewicki

(2023) East–west inequalities and the ambiguous racialisation of ‘Eastern Europeans’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49(6): 1481–99.

61.

Liotta

(2005) Imagining Europe: symbolic geography and the future. Mediterranean Quarterly 16(3): 67–85.

62.

Löwenhardt

(2005) Stuck in the middle: the shared neighbourhood of the EU and Russia, 2000-2005. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

63.

Marples

Laputska

(2020) Kurapaty: Belarus’ continuing debates. Slavic Review 79(3): 521–43.

64.

Meijer

Panke

(2021) Consistency in EU foreign policy: the role of member states. Journal of European Integration 43(5): 605–621.

65.

Mudrov

(2022) “We did not unleash this war. Our conscience is clear”. The Russia–Ukraine military conflict and its perception in Belarus. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 30(2): 273-284.

66.

Musliu

(2021) Europeanization and Statebuilding as Everyday Practices: Performing Europe in the Western Balkans. London: Routledge.

67.

Musliu

Burlyuk

(2019) Imagining Ukraine: from history and myths to Maidan protests. East European Politics and Societies 33(3): 631–55.

68.

Nice

(2012) Playing both sides: Belarus between Russia and the EU (DGAP-Analyse, 2). Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-350228

69.

Official Journal of the European Union (2020) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2129 of 17 December 2020 Implementing Article 8A(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 Concerning Restrictive Measures in Respect of Belarus. OJ L 426I, 17.12.2020. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2020/2129/oj (accessed 10 April 2025).

70.

O’Sullivan

Krulišová

(2023) Central European subalterns speak security (too): towards a truly post-Western feminist security studies. Journal of International Relations and Development 26(4): 660–74.

71.

Padhol

Marples

(2011) The 2010 presidential election in Belarus. Problems of Post-communism 58(1): 3–16.

72.

Patterson

(2003) On the edge of reason: the boundaries of Balkanism in Slovenian, Austrian, and Italian discourse. Slavic Review 62(1): 110–41.

73.

Petrova

Korosteleva

(2021) Societal fragilities and resilience: the emergence of peoplehood in Belarus. Journal of Eurasian Studies 12(2): 122–32.

74.

Polovyi

(2022) The Republic of Belarus in Russian-Ukrainian War in 2014–2022. Baltija Publishing.

75.

Popa

(2017) Understanding EU-Belarus relations. Journal of Global Politics and Current Diplomacy 5(2): 9–20.

76.

Portela

(2016) Are European Union sanctions “targeted”? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29(3): 912–29.

77.

Puetter

(2014) The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

78.

Sabaratnam

(2017) Decolonising intervention: International statebuilding in Mozambique. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.

79.

Shlapentokh

(2012) The Role of Small States in the Post-cold War Era: The Case of Belarus. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.

80.

Smith

(2005) The outsiders: the European neighbourhood policy. International Affairs 81(4): 757–73.

81.

Stykow

(2023) Making sense of a surprise: perspectives on the 2020 “Belarusian revolution”. Nationalities Papers 51(4): 803–22.

82.

Subotić

(2025) Serbia’s civic awakening: The 2024-2025 student protests in focus (Policy Brief). Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS). Available at: https://feps‑europe.eu/wp‑content/uploads/2025/06/POLICY‑BRIEF‑JUNE‑2025‑Serbias‑civic‑awakening.pdf

83.

Szczepanski

(2020) Belarus: The EU’s Response to the Protests. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), September [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.Eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2020)652069 (accessed 23 June 2025).

84.

Titarenko

(2018) Belarus and the European Union. From confrontation to the dialogue. CSE Working Papers Anno 2018. Available at: https://www.paperscse.unisa.it/autori/titarenko

85.

Trapara

(2021) The Belarusian Issue in European Affairs. Belgrade: Institute of International Politics and Economics; Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade.

86.

W-Insight (2025) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya: I want to return home and I see it happening. W-Insight. Available at: https://w-insight.com/2025/03/24/sviatlana-tsikhanouskaya-i-want-to-return-home-and-i-see-it-happening/ (accessed 3 June 2025).

87.

Walker

(2020) Belarus opposition leader to ask Merkel about upping pressure on Lukashenko. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/04/belarus-opposition-leader-to-ask-merkel-about-upping-pressure-on-lukashenko-svetlana-tikhanovskaya (accessed 3 June 2025).

88.

White

(2000) The discourse of Europe and the search for a European identity. In: Strath

(ed.) Europe and the Other and Europe as the Other. Lausanne: Peter Lang, pp.67–86.

89.

White

McAllister

Feklyunina

(2010) Belarus, Ukraine and Russia: East or West? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 12(3): 344–67.

90.

Wilson

(2011) Belarus: The Last European Dictatorship. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

91.

Wisniewski

(2013) The influence of the European Parliament on the European external action service. European Foreign Affairs Review 18(1): 81–102.

The discourse of the European Union on the 2020 Belarusian civic protests: Understanding the contemporary symbolic geography of Belarus

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References