This study explores preservice education student perceptions on ChatGPT's ability to write lesson plans through the use of a guided analysis process with 59 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in STEM, TESOL, and Social studies methods courses for grades PreK-12. A pre- post-survey and a reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT were written by participants. Statistically significant findings were revealed regarding student perceptions of ChatGPT's ability to write a complete lesson plan in their content area and ChatGPT's ability to write a detailed lesson plan for a substitute teacher. In both cases, students’ perceptions of ChatGPT to complete these tasks decreased after they engaged in analysis of the content. Students shared that they plan to use ChatGPT for lesson planning as a practicing educator, but indicated that revision of output is necessary. A call for future work is explored.
AdeyeleV. O.RamnarainU. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in inquiry-based learning: Teacher perspectives. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.638
2.
AlAliR.WardatY.Al-SaudK.AlhayekK. A. (2024). Generative AI in education: Best practices for successful implementation. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 1016–1025. https://doi.org/10.61707/pkwb8402
3.
BaytakA. (2024). The content analysis of the lesson plans created by ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.19
4.
BroutınM. S. T. (2024). Exploring mathematics teacher candidates’ instrumentation process of generative artificial intelligence for developing lesson plans. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 14(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1347061
5.
ChanC. K. Y.HuW. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
6.
ChiuT. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
7.
ClarkT. M.FhanerM.StoltzfusM.QueenM. S. (2024). Using ChatGPT to support lesson planning for the historical experiments of Thomson, Millikan, and Rutherford. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1992–1999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00200
8.
CornishD.LarterZ. (2024). I don’t have to write an essay ever again!”: University student reflections on ChatGPT in the classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231219267
9.
CorpA.RevelleC. (2023). ChatGPT is here to stay: Using ChatGPT with student teachers for lesson planning. The Texas Forum of Teacher Education, 14, 116–124.
10.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th edition). Sage.
11.
CunA.HuangT. (2024). Gen AI & TPACK teacher education student perspectives. In SearsonM.LangranE.TrumbleJ. (Eds.), Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 62–75). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
12.
DaiY.LiuA.LimC. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002
13.
DamianoA. D.LuriaE. J. M.SarmientoC.ZhaoN. (2024). Early perceptions of teaching and learning using generative AI in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 346–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241233290
14.
DeCarloM.LynchW.LeeV.MoixD.KleinV. (2024). Assessment and instructional decision making: How AI can support data literacy development for preservice teachers. In SearsonM.LangranE.TrumbleJ. (Eds.), Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 129–144). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
15.
DotanR.ParkerL. S.RadzilowiczJ. (2024, June). Responsible adoption of generative AI in higher education: Developing a “points to consider” approach based on faculty perspectives. In The 2024 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 2033–2046). Association for Computing Machinery.
16.
ElSayaryA. (2023). An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926
17.
FarrellyT.BakerN. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109
HajamK. B.GahirS. (2024). Unveiling the attitudes of university students toward artificial intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231225920
20.
HashmiN.BalA. S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education and beyond. Business Horizons.
21.
Hodge-ZickermanA.YorkC. (2024). Embracing ChatGPT in the evolving landscape of mathematics teacher education and assessment. In SearsonM.LangranE.TrumbleJ. (Eds.), Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 111–128). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
22.
The jamovi project. (2022). jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org
23.
KalendaP. (2024, August 26). ChatGPT can write my class assignments, right?: A guided classroom activity for teaching the strengths and weaknesses of generative AI tools. Ideas That Matter: Artificial Intelligence. KnightScholar. https://knightscholar.geneseo.edu/ideas-that-matter-24-25/2/
24.
KaramanM. R. (2024). Are lesson plans created by ChatGPT more effective? An experimental study. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.607
25.
KehoeF. (2023). Leveraging generative AI tools for enhanced lesson planning in initial teacher education at post primary. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.124
26.
KhalidM.AhmadN. (2024). Educational innovation: Challenges and opportunities with generative AI integration.
27.
KhazanchiR.KhazanchiP. (2024). Generative AI to improve special education teacher preparation for inclusive classrooms. In SearsonM.LangranE.TrumbleJ. (Eds.), Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 159–177). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
28.
KoraishiO. (2023). Teaching English in the age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to optimize EFL materials and assessment. Language Education and Technology, 3(1), 55–72.
29.
KurtzG.AmzalagM.ShakedN.ZaguriY.Kohen-VacsD.GalE.ZailerG.Barak-MedinaE. (2024). Strategies for integrating generative AI into higher education: Navigating challenges and leveraging opportunities. Education Sciences, 14(5), Article 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503
30.
LeeD.ArnoldM.SrivastavaA.PlastowK.StrelanP.PloecklF.LekkasD.PalmerE. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
31.
LeeG. G.ZhaiX. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A Study on pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01674.
32.
MalikA.AslamM. U. (2024). Reimagining teaching: Exploring challenges of generative AI integration in education.
33.
Michel-VillarrealR.Vilalta-PerdomoE.Salinas-NavarroD. E.Thierry-AguileraR.GerardouF. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
34.
MintzJ.HolmesW.LiuL.Perez-OrtizM. (2023). Artificial intelligence and K-12 education: Possibilities, pedagogies and risks. Computers in the Schools, 40(4), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2279870
35.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
36.
MosaiyebzadehF.PouriyehS.PariziR.DehbozorgiN.DorodchiM.Macêdo BatistaD. (2023, October). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in education: Applications and challenges. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on information technology education (pp. 84–89).
37.
NikolopoulouK. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring ways of harnessing pedagogical practices with the assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022489
38.
OnalS.Kulavuz-OnalD. (2024). A cross-disciplinary examination of the instructional uses of ChatGPT in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231196532
39.
PowellW.CourchesneS. (2024). Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans. PloS one, 19(6), e0305337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305337
40.
SaimonM.MtenziF.LaviczaZ.FenyvesiK.ArnoldM.Diego-MantecónJ. M. (2024). Applying the 6E learning by design model to support student teachers to integrate artificial intelligence applications in their classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12795-9
41.
SakamotoM.TanS.ClivazS. (2024). Social, cultural and political perspectives of generative AI in teacher education: Lesson planning in Japanese teacher education. In SearsonM.LangranE.TrumbleJ. (Eds.), Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 178–209). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
42.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The qualitative coding manual for researchers (4th edition). Sage.
43.
SmolanskyA.CramA.RaduescuC.ZeivotsS.HuberE.KizilcecR. F. (2023). Educator and student perspectives on the impact of generative AI on assessments in higher education. Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 378–382).
44.
UzumcuO.AcilmisH. (2024). Do innovative teachers use ai-powered tools more interactively? A study in the context of diffusion of innovation theory. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09687-1
45.
van den BergG.du PlessisE. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
46.
WalczakK.CellaryW. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread access to Generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 9(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743
47.
YeralanS.LeeL. A. (2023). Generative AI: Challenges to higher education. Sustainable Engineering and Innovation, 5(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v5i2.id196
48.
YusufA.PervinN.Román-GonzálezM. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
