The Effect of Implementing Mixed-Reality Simulation (MRS) in an Educator Preparation Program

Abstract

Mixed-reality simulation (MRS) is a new and advanced technology implemented in Educator Preparation Programs (EPP) across the United States. However, more research is needed on the effectiveness of MRS in EPPs and its impact on beginning teacher candidates. This study sought to determine the effect of teacher candidates after utilizing MRS and its impact on acquiring teaching pedagogical skills. Forty-five surveys collected from teacher candidates revealed two themes: the beneficial experience of MRS in an EPP and technology concerns.

Keywords

mixed reality simulation educator preparation program technology literacy transfer of learning self-efficacy feedback

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

(1994). Self-efficacy. In Ramachaudran

V. S.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press.

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Branch Alliance for Educator Diversity (2022). MRS External Partners 2022: MRS guidance document. Retrieved July 1, 2023, from https://www.educatordiversity.org/

Calandra

Sun

Puvirajah

(2014). A new perspective on preservice teachers’ video-aided reflection. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(3), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2014.891880

Carrington

Kervin

Ferry

(2011). Enhancing the development of pre-service teacher professional identity via an online classroom simulation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 351–368. Retrieved on December 15, 2023, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/36181/

Dalinger

Katherine

Stansberry

Xiu

(2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, Retrieved on May 21, 2023, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519302490

Dawson

M. R.

Lignugaris/Kraft

(2017). Meaningful practice: Generalizing foundation teaching skills from TLE TeachLivE™ to the classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 40(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184

DeSantis

W. J.

Delcourt

M. A. B.

Shore

B. M.

Greenwood

J. C.

(2023). Impact of Data-Driven Feedback and Coaching on Preservice Teachers’ Questioning Skills for Higher-Order Thinking within a Mixed-Reality Simulation Environment. Education Sciences, 13(596), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060596

Dieker

Hughes

Hynes

(2023). The past, the present, and the future of the evolution of mixed reality in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111070

10.

Dieker

L. A.

Hughes

C. E.

Hynes

M. C.

Straub

(2017). Using simulated virtual environments to improve teacher performance. School-University Partnerships, 10(3), 62–81. Retrieved on December 22, 2023, from https://napds.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Using-Simulated-Virtual-Environments-to-Improve-Teacher-Performance-.pdf.

11.

Dieker

L. A.

Lignugaris-Kraft

Hynes

Hughes

C. E.

(2016). Mixed reality environments in teacher education: Development and future applications. Online in Real Time: Using Web 2.0 for Distance Education in Rural Special Education, 26, 122–131.

12.

Driver

Zimmer

Murphy

(2018). Using mixed reality simulations to prepare preservice special educators for collaboration in inclusive settings. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(1), 57–77. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved on January 24, 2024, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181153/

13.

Freeman

I. M.

Lee

(2024). Pre-Service teacher Candidates’ perceptions of classroom-based mixed-reality simulations. Education Sciences, 14(11), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040347

14.

Gundel

Piro

J. S.

(2021). Perceptions of self-efficacy in mixed reality simulations. Action in Teacher Education, 43(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1864513https://doi.org/ (5)

15.

Gundel

Piro

J. S.

Straub

Smith

(2019). Self-efficacy in mixed reality simulations: Implications for preservice teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 54(3), 44–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1591560

16.

Hudson

M. E.

Voytecki

K. S.

Owens

T. L.

Zhang

(2019). Preservice teacher experiences implementing classroom management practices through mixed-reality simulations. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519841421

17.

Hughes

C. E.

Stapleton

C. B.

Hughes

D. E.

Smith

E. M.

(2005). Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(6), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.139

18.

Hume

(2012). Primary connections: Simulating the classroom in initial teacher education. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9210-0

19.

Laurillard

Charlton

Craft

Dimakopoulos

Ljubojevic

Magoulas

Masterman

Pujadas

Whitley

E. A.

Whittlestone

(2013). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00458.x

20.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

21.

Maxey

A. X.

(2020). Exploring the Complexity of Teaching: A Descriptive “Snapshot” of the Act and Process of Teaching in Public Education . Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Available online: https://ir.ua.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/7025/file_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

22.

Meggs

S. M.

Greer

Collins

(2012). Virtual reality in interior design education: Enhanced outcomes through constructivist engagement in second life. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 7(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/jwltt.2012010102

23.

Murphy

K. M.

Cook

A. L.

Fallon

L. M.

(2021). Mixed reality simulations for social-emotional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(6), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721998152

24.

Pan

Zheng

Campbell

A. G.

(2021). Knowing your student: Targeted teaching decision support through asymmetric mixed reality collaborative learning. IEEE Access, 9(1), 164742–164751. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3134589

25.

Personal communication. (2024). Interview log sheet.

26.

Putnam

R. T.

Borko

(2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176586

27.

Regalla

Hutchinson

Nutta

Ashtari

(2016). Examining the impact of a simulation classroom experience on teacher candidates’ sense of efficacy in communicating with English learners. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 337–367. Retrieved on December 25, 2023, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1120760.

28.

Sayeski

K. L.

Hamilton-Jones

Cutler

Earle

G. A.

Husney

(2019). The role of practice and feedback for developing teacher candidates’ opportunities to respond expertise. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 42(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417735876

29.

Spencer

Drescher

Sears

Scruggs

A. F.

Schreffler

(2019). Comparing the efficacy of virtual simulation to traditional classroom role-play. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1772–1785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119855613

30.

Spitzman

Balconi

Renaud

Ingle

Cayson

(2022). Promising Practice for Building Community through Mixed-Reality Simulation in Teacher Preparation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31187

31.

Storey

V. J.

Cox

T. D.

(2015). Utilizing TeachLivE™(TLE) to build educational leadership capacity: The development and application of virtual simulations. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n2a5

32.

Tang

Y. M.

K. M.

Lau

H. C. W.

, et al. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of learning design with mixed reality (MR) in higher education. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00427-9

33.

Ward

Chen

Higginson

Xie

(2018). Teaching rehearsals and repeated teaching: Practice-based physical education teacher education pedagogies. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 89(6), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1476937