Lecture capture (LC) has been implemented globally to enhance accessible resources supporting academic success. Little is known about the effects of teaching students how to effectively use LC to augment learning. This correlational pilot study used a 14-item Likert-like survey to examine relationships between undergraduate LC viewing practices and final course grade. No statistically significant findings were identified between LC use and course grades. However, the mean course grade was 3.29% higher among students (n = 32) who implemented and maintained effective LC strategies (M = 90.61, SD = 5.68) compared with those who did not (n = 18). Six of the 14 LC survey items revealed significant positive correlations and two of the 14 LC survey items revealed significant inverse correlations. These findings could help educators prioritize teaching students how to effectively and efficiently use LC resources to enhance academic outcomes.
AgarwalP. K. (2019). Retrieval practice & Bloom’s taxonomy: Do students need fact knowledge before higher order learning?Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000282
2.
Agarwal & BainP. M. (2019). Powerful teaching: Unleash the science of learning. Wiley.
3.
BosN.GroeneveldC.van BruggenJ.Brand-GruwelS. (2015). The use of recorded lectures in education and the impact on lecture attendance and exam performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 906–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12300
4.
BrackenburyW. (2021). Relationship between lecture capture usage and examination performance of undergraduate bioscience students. Journal of Biological Education, 55(4), 429–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1707258
5.
BrooksC.EricksonG.GreerJ.GutwinC. (2014). Modeling and quantifying the behaviors of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education, 75, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.002
6.
CostleyJ.FanguyM.LangeC.BaldwinM. (2021). The effects of video lecture viewing on cognitive load. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/212528-020-09254-y
7.
DesyJ.BuscheK.CusanoR.VealeP.CoderreS.McLaughlinK. (2018). How teachers can help learners build storage and retrieval strength. Medical Teacher, 40(4), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408900
8.
FordM.BurnsC.MitchN.GomezM. (2012). The effectiveness of classroom capture technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/doi.10.1177/149787412452982
9.
GroenJ.QuigleyB.HerryY. (2016). Examining the use of lecture capture technology: Implications for teaching and learning. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), Article 8. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol7/iss1/8
10.
HadguR.HuynhS.GopalanC. (2016). The use of lecture capture and student performance in physiology. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 5(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v5n1p11
11.
HallG.IvaldiA. (2017). A qualitative approach to understanding the role of lecture capture in student learning experiences. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1263805
12.
HultbergP.CalangeD. S.LeeE. (2018). Promoting long-lasting learning through instructional design. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 18(3), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i3.23179
13.
IBM Corp (Released 2019). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 26.0. IBM Corp.
14.
KrautscheidL.FiferP.HernandezR.BlumT. (2022). Perceptions and utilization of a multimedia teaching strategy to prevent student nurse attrition. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 17(4), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2022.07.002
15.
MayerR. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
16.
MoreheadK.DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A.BlasimanR.HollisR. B. (2019). Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: Implications for student learning, memory, and achievement. Memory (Hove, England), 27(6), 807–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694
17.
MurphyD.HooverK.AgadzhanyanK.KuehnJ.CastelA. (2021). Learning in double time: The effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3899
18.
NordmannE.Kuepper-TetzelC. E.RobsonL. (2020). Lecture capture: Practical recommendations for students and instructors. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(3), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000190
19.
OwstonR.LupshenyukD.WidemanH. (2011). Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: Student perceptions and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.006
20.
RobertsonB.FlowersM. (2020). Determining the impact of lecture videos on student outcomes. Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2020.130203
21.
ShawG.MolnarD. (2011). Non-native English language speakers benefit most from the use of lecture capture in medical school. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(6), 416–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20552
WitthausG. R.RobinsonC. L. (2015). Lecture capture literature review. A review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Centre for Academic Practice. Loughborough University.
24.
YuP. T.WangB. Y.SuM. H. (2015). Lecture capture with real-time rearrangement of visual elements: Impact on student performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal/12109
