Simulations provide a unique opportunity to practice newly acquired skills in a low risk environment. For this reason, simulations have historically been used in preservice teacher education programs to enable student teachers to apply generalized pedagogical practices. This pilot study examined how simulations could be integrated with inservice teachers as an assessment of content-specific instructional practices covered in a professional development program. The study utilized two nationally recognized simulation platforms and included a preliminary investigation of validity of the simulation assessments, a comparison of participant performance on the simulation assessment to the standard module assessment, and a comparison of the usability and feasibility of each platform for future assessments. While results suggest that simulation platforms are a promising means of conducting content-specific assessments, current limitations of such platforms may challenge their large-scale usage as part of a professional development program.
ChernikovaO.HeitzmannN.StadlerM.HolzbergerD.SeidelT.FischerF. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
3.
ChristensenR.KnezekG.Tyler-WoodT.GibsonD. (2011). Simschool: An online dynamic simulator for enhancing teacher preparation. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2011.042649
4.
DalingerT.ThomasK. B.StansberryS.XiuY. (2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for preservice teachers. Computers & Education, 144, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696
5.
DanielsonC. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6.
DoveA.BlanksB.DunleavyM. (2020). Improving competency based professional development in elementary mathematics. In Schmidt-CrawfordD. (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1356–1364). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/215899/
7.
DoveA.BorlandJ.MoylanA.DunleavyM. (2021). Reflecting on the development and use of virtual teaching simulations for professional development. In LangranE.ArchambaultL. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 410–414). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/219163/
8.
Gess-NewsomeJ. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In BerryA.FriedrichsenP.LoughrnaJ. (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
9.
GibsonD.ChristensenR.Tyler-WoodT.KnezekG. (2011). Simschool: Enhancing teacher preparation through simulated classrooms. In KoehlerM.MishraP. (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1504–1510). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/36508/
10.
HudsonM. E.VoyteckiK. S.ZhangG. (2018). Mixed-reality teaching experiences improve preservice special education students’ perceptions of their ability to manage a classroom. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v11i2.7308
11.
JudsonE. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection?Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581–597. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/6046/
Landon-HaysM.Peterson-AhmadM. B.FrazierA. D. (2020). Learning to teach: How a simulated learning environment can connect theory to practice in general and special education educator preparation programs. Education Sciences, 10(7), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070184
15.
McPhersonR.Tyler-WoodT.McEnturffA.PeakP. (2011). Using a computerized classroom simulation to prepare preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(1), 93–110. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/31438/
16.
O’CallaghanC.PiroJ. (2016). Virtual simulations in a practice-based teacher education. The Field Experience Journal, 18, 96–120.
17.
PawłowiczE.KuleszaM.SzymańskaA.Masajtis-ZagajewskaA.BartczakM.NowickiM. (2020). ‘I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.’–Incorporating high-fidelity medical simulation into the undergraduate nephrology course. Renal Failure, 42(1), 1184–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2020.1847722
18.
ReznekM.Smith-CogginsR.HowardS.KiranK.HarterP.SowbY.GabaD.KrummelT. (2003). Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM): Pilot study of a simulation-based crisis management course for emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 10(4), 386 – 389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x
19.
RileyR. A.Jr.CadotteE. R.BonneyL.MacGuireC. (2013). Using a business simulation to enhance accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 28(4), 801–822. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50512
20.
SasakiR.GoffW.DowsettA.ParoissienD.MatthiesJ.Di IorioC.MonteyS.RoweS.PuddyG. (2020). The practicum experience during COVID-19 – Supporting preservice teachers practicum experience through a simulated classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 329–339. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216244/
21.
ScaleseR. J.ObesoV. T.IssenbergS. B. (2008). Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0283-4
