Comparative Effects of Computer-Based Reading Programs on the Early Literacy Skills of At-Risk Students

Abstract

Students displaying reading difficulties/disabilities at the end of third grade are unlikely to succeed in content areas and graduate from high school. One alternative to meeting the learning needs of students is to provide explicit instructional support in basic literacy skills through computer-based reading programs via after-school programs. This study examined the effects of two computer-based reading programs on the reading skills of 71 randomly assigned at-risk students using a pre–post-test design. Furthermore, tutor and students’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness and desirability of the programs were examined. The results indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the programs on the Word Use Fluency measure and both computer-based programs were effective in facilitating the growth of basic early literacy skills of students at-risk for reading failure. A description of the computer programs, results, implications, and limitations of the study are discussed.

Keywords

computer-based reading programs early literacy skills after-school interventions at-risk students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agodini

Dynarski

Honey

Levin

(2003). The effectiveness of educational technology: Issues and recommendations for the national study (Report No. ED498071). Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498071.pdf

Carr

P. G.

(2016). NCES Statement on PISA 2015 results. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/commissioner/remarks2016/12_06_2016.asp

Cunningham

A. E.

Perry

K. E.

Stanovich

K. E.

Stanovich

P. J.

(2004). Disciplinary knowledge of k-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y

Durlak

J. A.

Weissberg

R. P.

(2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Retrieved from https://casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/PDF-1-the-impact-of-after-school-programs-that-promote-personal-and-social-skills-executive-summary.pdf

Dynarski

Agodini

Heaviside

Novak

Carey

Campuzano

Means

Murphy

Penuel

Javitz

Emery

Sussex

(2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

Engelmann

(2002). Funnix 2: Reading. Royal Limited Partnership.

Engelmann

(2003). Funnix reviewers’ guide: A consumer’s guide to evaluating supplemental and intervention reading programs. Retrieved from www.funnix.com/funnix2012/PDFs/Reviewers_Guide.pdf

Engelmann

Seitz-Davis

(2001). Funnix: A tutor in your computer. Royal Limited Partnership.

Good

R. H.

Kaminski

R. A.

Shinn

Bratten

Shinn

Laimon

Smith

Flindt

(2004). Technical adequacy of DIBELS: Results of the early childhood research institute on measuring growth and development (Technical Report, No. 7). University of Oregon.

10.

Good

R. H.

Simmons

D. C.

Kaméenui

E. J.

(2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies in Reading, 5(3), 257–288.

11.

Hammond

S. S.

(2012). The effects of the Headsprout early reading program on the literacy skills and on-task behavior of at-risk urban kindergarten students [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1343103239&disposition=inline

12.

Howell

R. D.

Stanger

Erickson

Wheaton

J. E.

(2000). Evaluation of a computer-based program on the reading performance of first grade students with potential for reading failure. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500401

13.

Huffstetter

King

J. R.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Schneider

J. J.

Powell-Smith

K. A.

(2010). Effects of a computer-based early reading program on the early reading and oral language skills of at-risk preschool children. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15(4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2010.532415

14.

Kim

J. S.

Capotosto

Hartry

Fitzgerald

(2011). Can a mixed-method literacy intervention improve the reading achievement of low-performing elementary school students in an after-school program? Results from a randomized controlled trial of READ 180 enterprise. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711399148

15.

Layng

Twyman

J. S.

Stikeleather

(2003). Headsprout early reading: Reliably teaching children to read. Behavioral Technology Today, 3, 7–20. Retrieved from http://www.behavior.org/resources/191.pdf

16.

Lyon

G. R.

(2001). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement. Subcommittee on Education Reform, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved from http://www.reidlyon.com/edpolicy/10-MEASURING-SUCCESS-USING-ASSESSMENTS-AND-ACCOUNTABILITY-TO-RAISE-STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT.pdf

17.

Lyon

G. R.

Chhabra

(2004). The science of reading research. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 12–17.

18.

Mather

Bos

Babur

(2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and in-service teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(50), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400508

19.

National Center for Education Statistics (2018). 2017 Reading Results. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2017_highlights/files/infographic_2018_reading.pdf

20.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidenced-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading assessment. (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). U.S. Government Printing Office.

21.

Piasta

S. B.

Connor

C. D.

Fishman

B. J.

Morrison

F. J.

(2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Journal of Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851364

22.

Pindiprolu

S. S.

Forbush

(2009). Evaluating the promise of computer-based reading interventions with students with reading difficulties. I-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 4(3), 41–49.

23.

Regtvoort

A. G. F. M.

Leij

A. V. D.

(2007). Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.01.005

24.

Rouse

C. E.

Krueger

A. B.

(2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: A randomized evaluation of a “scientifically based” reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.10.005

25.

Scammaca

Vaghun

Roberts

Wanzek

Torgensen

J. K.

(2007). Extensive reading interventions in grades k-3: From research to practice. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

26.

Slavin

R. E.

Lake

Chambers

Cheung

Davis

(2009). Effective beginning reading programs: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391–1465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309341374

27.

Temple

Deutsch

Poldrack

Miller

Tallal

Merzenich

Gabrieli

J. D. E.

(2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, 100(5), 2860–2865. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0030098100

28.

Torgesen

J. K.

Wagner

R. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

Herron

Lindamood

(2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0032-y

29.

Watson

Hempenstall

(2008). Effects of a computer-based beginning reading program on young children. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1208