Do School Levels Matter? How Elementary,Middle,and High School Teachers Differ in Their Perceptions and Use of Technology

Abstract

This study used the Technology Use and Perceptions Survey to explore whether there are differences reported by teachers (N = 1,287) from elementary, middle, and high schools from a single school district. A two-step data analysis process using multivariate analysis of variance and item-by-item analysis of variance was employed. We used our analyses to generate profiles for elementary, middle, and high school teachers and draw comparisons across these profiles in our discussion. In particular, high school teachers reported the lowest perception of technology’s value and the most infrequent use of technology integration strategies even though they reported their students used technology more frequently. Elementary teachers reported the most frequent use of technology integration strategies and the lowest satisfaction with the access and support they receive. This study supports the need for more research to adequately explore the role of school levels as these differences could provide important insights.

Keywords

technology uses technology perceptions school level in-service teachers elementary school middle school high school

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angelle

P. S.

DeHart

C. A.

(2011). Teacher perceptions of teacher leadership: Examining differences by experience, degree, and position. NASSP Bulletin, 95, 141–160.

Antonenko

P. D.

Toy

Niederhauser

D. S.

(2012). Using cluster analysis for data mining in educational technology research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 383–398.

Becker

H. J.

(1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.

Blackwell

C. K.

Lauricella

A. R.

Wartella

(2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82–90.

Brockington

R. W. C.

(2003). A comparative analysis of elementary, middle, and high school teachers’morale [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Carolina State.

Bull

Willis

Bell

(2000). A user’s guide to the CITE Journal. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial]. http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/editorials/article1.htm

Buyukgoze-Kavas

Duffy

R. D.

Güneri

O. Y.

Autin

K. L.

(2013). Job satisfaction among Turkish teachers: Exploring differences by school level. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(2), 261–273.

Carnevale

A. P.

Smith

Melton

(2011). STEM: Science technology engineering mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

Chen

C. H.

(2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.

10.

Ertmer

P. A.

(1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

11.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

12.

Ertmer

P. A.

Ottenbreit-Leftwich

A. T.

(2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

13.

Ertmer

P. A.

Ottenbreit-Leftwich

A. T.

Sadik

Sendurur

(2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.

14.

Harris

Mishra

Koehler

(2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.

15.

Hawkins

(1996). Technology in education: Transitions [Paper presentation]. National Education Summit, Pallisades Executive Conference Center, Pallisades, NY, United States.

16.

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. U. E. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of curriculum studies, 37(2), 155–192.

17.

Hermans

Tondeur

van Braak

Valcke

(2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.

18.

Hernandez-Ramos

(2005). If not here, where? Understanding teachers’ use of technology in silicon valley schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 39–64.

19.

Hew

K. F.

Brush

(2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

20.

Hogarty

K. Y.

Lang

T. R.

Kromrey

J. D.

(2003). Another look at technology use in classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ perceptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 139–162.

21.

Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Wilson, M. L. (2017). An examination of seven years of technology integration in Florida schools: Through the lens of the Levels of Digital Divide in Schools. Computers & Education, 113, 135–161.

22.

Holmes

Bourke

Preston

Shaw

Smith

(2013). Supporting innovation in teaching: What are the key contextual factors? International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1(1), 85–102.

23.

Hsu

Kuan

P. Y.

(2013). The impact of multilevel factors on technology integration: The case of Taiwanese grade 1–9 teachers and schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(1), 25–50.

24.

Inan

F. A.

Lowther

D. L.

(2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154.

25.

Jenkins

(2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NYU Press.

26.

Karaca

Can

Yildirim

(2013). A path model for technology integration into elementary school settings in Turkey. Computers & Education, 68, 353–365.

27.

Klassen

R. M.

Chiu

M. M.

(2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741.

28.

Koenig

J. A.

(Ed.). (2011). Assessing 21st century skills: Summary of a workshop. National Academies Press.

29.

Kreijns

Van Acker

Vermeulen

van Buuren

(2013). What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 217–225.

30.

Kumsaikaew

Jackman

Dark

V. J.

(2006). Task relevant information in engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(3), 227–239.

31.

Latio

G. W.

(2009). Examination of factors that influence computer technology use for classroom instruction by teachers in Ohio public high schools [Doctoral dissertation]. Ohio University.

32.

Liu

Ritzhaupt

A. D.

Dawson

Barron

A. E.

(2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813.

33.

Marston

S. H.

(2010). Why do they teach? A comparison of elementary, high school, and college teachers. Education, 131(2), 437–454.

34.

Midgley

Anderman

Hicks

(1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 90–113.

35.

Miranda

Russell

(2012). Understanding factors associated with teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 652–666.

36.

Mishra

Koehler

M. J.

(2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017.

37.

Mueller

Wood

Willoughby

Ross

Specht

(2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537.

38.

National Education Technology Plan Technical Working Group. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology.

39.

Nunnally

(1978). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill.

40.

O’Dwyer

Russell

Bebel

(2004). Elementary teachers’ use of technology: Characteristics of teachers, schools, and districts associated with technology use. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.

41.

Park

S. H.

Ertmer

P. A.

(2007). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers’ beliefs regarding technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 247–267.

42.

Peck, C., Hewitt, K. K., Mullen, C. A., Lashley, C. A., Eldridge, J. A., & Douglas, T. R. M. (2015). Digital youth in brick and mortar schools: Examining the complex interplay of students, technology, education, and change. Teachers College Record, 117(5), 1–40.

43.

Perrotta

(2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers' perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327.

44.

Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Cavanaugh, C. (2012). An investigation of factors influencing student use of technology in K-12 classrooms using path analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 229–254.

45.

Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907.

46.

Russell

Bebell

O’Dwyer

O’Connor

(2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.

47.

Ryan

A. M.

Kuusinen

C. M.

Bedoya-Skoog

(2015). Managing peer relations: A dimension of teacher self-efficacy that varies between elementary and middle school teachers and is associated with observed classroom quality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 147–156.

48.

Shaffer

J. P.

(1995). Multiple hypothesis testing: A review. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(561–584), 1–2.

49.

Shapka

J. D.

Ferrari

(2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 319–334.

50.

Sonnentag

Lange

(2002). The relationship between high performance and knowledge about how to master cooperation situations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(5), 491–508.

51.

Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33.

52.

Tondeur

Valcke

Van Braak

(2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494–506.

53.

Tweed

S. R.

(2013). Technology implementation: Teacher age, experience, self-efficacy, and professional development as related to classroom technology integration (Paper 1109) [Electronic Theses and Dissertations]. http://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1109.

54.

Veen

(1993). The role of beliefs in the use of information technology: Implications for teacher education, or teaching the right thing at the right time. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 2(2), 139–153.

55.

Williams

C. J.

(2015). An investigation of K-12 teachers’ attitudes toward computer technology use in schools. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 2(1), 71–87.

56.

Windschitl

Sahl

(2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.

57.

Wolters

C. A.

Daugherty

S. G.

(2007). Goal structures and teachers' sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and grade level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 181–193.

58.

Wozney

Venkatesh

Abrami

P. C.

(2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 120–173.

59.

Xie

Shen

(2013). Teacher leadership at different school levels: Findings and implications from the 2003–04 schools and staffing survey in US public schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(3), 327–348.