The coronavirus pandemic has adversely affected all sectors globally including the education sector. Education institutes across all levels (preprimary, primary, secondary, and higher education) have closed in 188 countries across the globe. Prolonged closure of colleges and schools has forced the educational sector to adopt the online mode of teaching. But one question that is bothering most of the academicians is: Can this online mode of teaching standalone in the long run? To answer this question, our article has proposed an alternative model of delivering education in the time of crisis. This article also helps to explore and compare different modes of course delivery. It also tries to compare and contrast different modes of education through Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. This article limits its analysis to management education only. An in-depth systematic review from various research papers, articles, cases was done for this article to suggest the model. We found that the management education in India needs a paradigm shift in design, delivery, and assessment and as has been the trend, the trend-setter has to be the faculty in association with the learner. The article recommends that the college administration and faculties should design curriculum in such a system which is more practice-oriented, has more interning hours and where theory gets tested and tried in the field.
AbrahamsI. (2009).
Does practical work motivate? A study of the effective value of practical work in secondary school science, Ian Abrahams. International Journal of Science Education,
31(17), 2335–2353.
AyitteyF. K.AyitteyM. K.ChiweroN. B.KamasahJ. S.DzuvorC. (2020).
Economic impacts of Wuhan 2019‐nCoV on China and the world. Journal of Medical Virology,
92, 473–475.
4.
BillingsD. M. (2007).
Distance education in nursing: 25 years and going strong. Computers Informatics, Nursing,
25, 121–123.
5.
BobbittL. M.InksS. A.KempK. J.MayoD. T. (2000).
Integrating marketing courses to enhance team-based experiential learning. Journal of Marketing Education,
22(1), 15–24.
DeweyJ. (1897).
My pedagogic creed. The School Journal LIV,
3, 77–80.
12.
DeweyJ. (1938). Education and experience.
Simon and Schuster.
13.
GobyV. P.LewisJ. H. (2000).
Using experiential learning theory and the Myers-Briggs type indicator in teaching business communication. Business Communication Quarterly,
63(3), 39–48.
GreenR. A.WhitburnL. Y. (2016).
Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education,
9, 422–430.
16.
HamerL. O. (2000).
The additive effects of semi-structured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of Marketing Education,
22(1), 25–34.
17.
HandeS. (2014).
Strengths weaknesses opportunities and threats of blended learning: Students’ perceptions. Annals of Medical Health Science Research,
4(3), 336–339.
KennedyE. J.LawtonL.WalkerE. (2001).
The case for using live cases: Shifting the paradigm in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education,
23(2), 145–151.
23.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
Prentice Hall.
24.
KozarJ. M.MarckettiS. B. (2008).
Utilizing field-based instruction as an effective teaching strategy. College Student Journal,
42(2), 305–311.
25.
LisowskiM.DisingerJ. F. (1991).
The effect of field-based instruction on student understandings of ecological concepts. Journal of Environmental Education,
23(1), 19–23.
26.
MangunkusumoR.BrugJ.DuisterhoutJ.de KoningH.RaatH. (2006).
Feasibility, acceptability, and quality of Internet-administered adolescent health promotion in a preventive-care setting. Health Education Research,
22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl010
27.
MaskookiK.RamaD. V.RaghunandanK. (1998).
Internships in undergraduate finance programs. Financial Practice & Education,
8, 74–82.
28.
NarayananV. K.OlkP.FukamiC. (2006, August).Determinants of internship effectiveness: An exploratory model [Paper presentation]. Paper presented as the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA, United States.
29.
RaymondM. A.McNabbD. E.MatthaeiC. F. (1993).
Preparing graduates for the workforce: The role of business education. Journal of Education for Business,
68, 202–206.
30.
RickinsonM.DillonJ.TeameyK.MorrisM.ChoiM. Y.SandersD.BenefieldP. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning.
Field Studies Council.
31.
RothmanM. (2007).
Lessons learned: Advice to employers from interns. Journal of Education for Business,
82, 140–144.
32.
ScottW.GoughS. (eds) (2003). Sustainable development and learning: Framing the issues.
Routledge Falmer.
33.
TamajyanS. (2008). Reviews of e-learning readiness rate of faculty and students inhabit moderates University [Thesis master's degree of agricultural promotion and education]. University of Tehran.
34.
TranterD. (2003). Fish out of water’: Students from disadvantaged schools and the university student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology,
93(1), 55–64.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020b, May 12). Distance learning solutions. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/solutions
37.
University World News. (2014). The growing mismatch between graduate skills, market needs. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20140204171742828
38.
Vice, J. P., & Carnes, L. W. (2001). Developing communication and professional skills through analytical reports. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 84--98.
