WhatsApp, the message-sharing social media app, is commonly used by students to collaborate on class assignments. This article examines the use of WhatsApp as part of a course gradable assignments and weekly pre- and postlecture discussions. This study is based on a survey and interviews conducted with undergraduate university students in the UAE who were asked if WhatsApp Groups use within the structured frame of the course and as gradable requirements increased their motivation to contribute to the course work. The results indicate that the students were more engaged with assignments that had WhatsApp embedded within the assignment structure. Furthermore, they found the pre- and postlecture WhatsApp discussions beneficial and effective, increasing motivation to participate actively in the lecture’s topic. This study concludes that the use of WhatsApp as part of course gradable assignments can contribute to active learning and enhance collaborative learning pre- and postlectures.
AbeP.JordanN. A. (2013).
Integrating social media into the classroom curriculum. About Campus,
18(1), 16–20.
2.
Al-BahraniA.PatelD.SheridanB. (2015).
Engaging students using social media: The students’ perspective. International Review of Economics Education,
19, 36–50.
3.
AlhazmiA. K.RahmanA. A. (2012). Why LMS failed to support student learning in higher education institutions. In 2012 IEEE symposium on e-learning, e-management and e-services (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
4.
AlqahtaniS. M.BhaskarC. V.Vadakalur ElumalaiK.AbumelhaM. (2018).
WhatsApp: An online platform for university-level English language education. Arab World English Journal,
9(4), 108–121.
5.
AnnamalaiN. (2019).
Using WhatsApp to extend learning in a blended classroom environment. Teaching English with Technology,
19(1), 3–20.
6.
AxinnW. G.PearceL. D. (2007). Mixed Method Data Collection Strategies. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BarhoumiC. (2015).
The effectiveness of WhatsApp mobile learning activities guided by activity theory on students’ knowledge management. Contemporary Educational Technology,
6(3), 221–238.
8.
BatraB. (2016).
News communication through WhatsApp. International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research,
3(10), 3725–3733.
9.
BonwellC. C.EisonJ. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education). The George Washington University.
10.
BouhnikD.DeshenM.GanR. (2014).
WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,
13(1), 217–231.
11.
BrannenJ. (2017). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research.
Routledge.
12.
CarrR.PalmerS.HagelP. (2015).
Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active Learning in Higher Education,
16, 173–186.
13.
CattaneoK. H. (2017).
Telling active learning pedagogies apart: From theory to practice. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research,
6(2), 144–152.
14.
ChipunzaP. (2013, March 15). Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively-generated re-sources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African University [Paper presentation]. International conference on advanced information and communication technology for education (ICAICTE 2013), Hainan, China.
15.
ChurchK.de OliveiraR. (2013). What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 352–361). ACM.
16.
CifuentesO. E.LentsN. H. (2011).
Increasing student-teacher interactions at an urban commuter campus through instant messaging and online office hours. Electronic Journal of Science Education,
14(1), 2–13.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455–472). Academic Press.
18.
CummingsC.MasonD.SheltonK.BaurK. (2017). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. In Flipped instruction: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 88–114). IGI Global.
GuacasA. F. M.CasalS. M. S. (2019).
WhatsApp and formulating guidelines on network interaction during the learning process in the university classroom. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (11), 121–136.
21.
HandelsmanJ.MillerS.PfundC. (2007). Scientific teaching.
New York:
W.H. Freeman.
22.
JonesS. (2008). Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Diane Publishing.
23.
KatesF. R.SamuelsS. K.CaseJ. B.DujowichM. (2019).
Lessons learned from a pilot study implementing a team-based messaging application (slack) to improve communication and teamwork in veterinary medical education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(1), 18–26.
24.
KimJ. A.HeoH. H.LeeH. H. (2014).
Flipped learning model for management class. Advanced Science and Technology Letters,
71, 59–62.
25.
KoomsonW. K. (2019). Ontology of ubiquitous learning: WhatsApp messenger competes successfully with learning management systems (LMS). In Science and information conference (pp. 107–117). Springer.
26.
LageM. J.PlattG. J.TreguaM. (2000).
Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education,
31(1), 30–43.
27.
LamJ. (2015). Collaborative learning using social media tools in a blended learning course. In International conference on hybrid learning and continuing education (pp. 187–198). Springer.
28.
LaudienH.López-FitzsimmonsB. M. (2020). Get out of your seats! Active learning strategies that engage students in the 21st century. In Transforming teaching through active learning symposium, Stetson University, Miami, Florida.
29.
LeeJ. Y. (2020). Enriching entrepreneurship education through integration of industry-standard technology tools and software. In M. A. Gonzalez-Perez, V. Taras, & K. Lynden (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of learning and teaching international business and management (pp. 591–607). Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
ManiarA.ModiA. (2013). “
WhatsApp” and youth. EXCELInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies,
3(10), 32–36.
31.
MatassiM.BoczkowskiP. J.MitchelsteinE. (2019).
Domesticating WhatsApp: Family, friends, work, and study in everyday communication. New Media & Society,
21(10), 2183–2200.
32.
MazanaM. Y. (2018). Social media in the classroom: WhatsApp a new communication tool for enhanced class interactions. Business Education Journal, 2(1), 2–8.
33.
MbodilaM.NdebeleC.MuhandjiK. (2014).
The effect of social media on student’s engagement and collaboration in higher education: A case study of the use of Facebook at a South African university. Journal of Communication,
5(2), 115–125.
34.
MoraA.PlanasE.Arnedo-MorenoJ. (2016). Designing game-like activities to engage adult learners in higher education. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (pp. 755–762). ACM.
35.
PindayiB. (2017). Social media uses and effects: The case of WhatsApp in Africa. In Impacts of the media on African socio-economic development (pp. 34–51). IGI Global.
36.
RambeP.ChipunzaC. (2013, August). Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively-generated resources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African University. In International conference on advanced ICT and education (ICAICTE-13) (pp. 331–337). Atlantis Press.
37.
RosenbergH.AsterhanC. S. (2018). “
WhatsApp, Teacher?” – Student perspectives on teacher-student WhatsApp interactions in secondary schools. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,
17, 205–226.
38.
SayanH. (2016).
Affecting higher students learning activity by using WhatsApp. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences,
4(3), 88–93.
39.
SelwynN. (2012).
Social media in higher education. The Europa World of Learning,
1, 1–10.
40.
SettlesB. (2009). Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Computer Sciences.
41.
StoneS.LoganA. (2018).
Exploring students’ use of the social networking site WhatsApp to foster connectedness in the online learning experience. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning Ireland,
3(1), 42–55.
42.
SubhashS.CudneyE. A. (2018).
Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior,
87, 192–206.
43.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage.
44.
TeddlieC.YuF. (2007).
Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
1(1), 77–100.
45.
TerrellS. R. (2012).
Mixed-methods research methodologies. The Qualitative Report,
17(1), 254–280.
46.
TessP. A. (2013).
The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior,
29(5), A60–A68.
47.
UdenzeS.OshioneboB. (2020).
Investigating ‘WhatsApp’ for collaborative learning among undergraduates. Üsküdar Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi Etkileşim, (5), 24–50.
48.
WilliamsC.AdesopeR. Y. (2017).
Undergraduates’ attitude towards the use of social media for learning purposes. World Journal of Education,
7(6), 90–95.
