Smart classroom is a technology-based learning that is proposed as a solution to increase the capabilities of students. This mode of teaching and learning make the education system more attractive and interactive, in addition to help educators to develop an engaging session. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of smart classrooms among Mathematics undergraduates. The study involved 72 students, and the data were analyzed using t test. The results show a significant difference among the students’ academic performance in the conventional and smart classroom. In addition, the use of smart classroom has greatly improved students’ performance.
BanoN.GanaieM. Y. (2016).
Smart classroom learning environment and performance of first grade students—A study. International Journal of Science Research and Education,
4(2), 4938–4941. doi:10.18535/ijsre/v4i02.10
2.
BarnesK.MarateoR.FerrisS. P. (2007).
Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate Journal of Online Education,
3(4), 1–8.
3.
BharathyJ. B. (2015).
Importance of computer assisted teaching & learning methods for chemistry. Science Journal of Education,
3(4), 11–16. doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.13
4.
BingimlasK. (2009).
Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,
5(3), 235–245. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75275
5.
BoultonH. (2015).
Exploring the effectiveness of new technologies: Improving literacy and engaging learners at risk of social exclusion in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education,
63, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.008
6.
CabiE. (2018).
The impact of the flipped classroom model on students’ academic achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,
19(3), 202–221. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
7.
CalebE.AloysuisE. (2016).
Facilitative learning and students' engagement in electrical technology for developing critical reasoning and lifelong learning skills in the University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice,
7(22), 36–40.
8.
ChachraI. K. (2015).
Effect of smart classroom assisted teaching on academic achievement of students of different intelligence level in social science. Abhinav National Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Arts & Education,
4(6), 4–10.
9.
ChoiJ. W.LeeY. J. (2012).
The Status of SMART Education in KOREA. Hypermedia and Telecommunications,
1, 175–178.
10.
CondieR.MunroB. (2007). The impact of ICT in schools: A landscape review.
Strathclyde, England:
University of Strathclyde.
11.
DomingoM.MarquesP. (2011).
Classroom 2.0 experiences and building on the use of ICT in teaching. Revista Comunicar,
19(37), 169–175.
12.
GaffneyM. (2010). Enhancing teachers’ take-up of digital content: Factors and design principles in technology adoption.
Melbourne, Australia:
Education Services Australia.
13.
GwakD. (2010). The meaning and predict of smart learning.
Seoul, Korea:
Korean e-Learning Industry Association.
14.
HammondM.CrossonS.FragkouliE.IngramJ.Johnstone-WilderP.JohnstoneWilderS. (2009).
Why do some student teachers make very good use of ICT? An exploratory case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,
18(1), 59–73.
15.
Hramiak, A., & Boulton, H. (2013). Escalating the use of Web 2.0 Technology in Secondary Schools in the United Kingdom: Barriers and Enablers beyond Teacher Training. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 11(2), 91--100.
16.
HuaM. T. A. (2012).
Promises and threats: IN2015 masterplan to pervasive computing in Singapore. Science, Technology and Society,
17(1), 37–56.
17.
HuangT. H.LiuY. C.ChangH. C. (2012).
Learning achievement in solving word-based mathematical questions through a computer-assisted learning system. Educational Technology and Society,
15(1), 248–259.
18.
HusseinS. (2006). Keberkesanan penggunaan perisian multimedia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran lokus dalam dua matra terhadap pelajar tingkatan dua (Kajian Berasaskan Sekolah) [Effectiveness of using multimedia software in the teaching and learning of locus in two-tier for secondary school students (School-Based Study)] (Project Report). Open University Malaysia, Malaysia.
19.
JenkinsM.BokosmatyR.BrownM.BrowneC.GaoQ.HansonJ.KupatadzeK. (2018).
Enhancing the design and analysis of flipped learning strategies. Teaching & Leaning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal,
5(1), 1–12.
20.
KankaanrantaM.MäkeläT. (2014). Valuation of emerging learning solutions. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014—World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 168–172). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
21.
KlineR. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research.
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
22.
KumariT. J. S.DenisiaS. P. (2013). Emerging technology of smart class teaching for secondary school teachers. In P. Udayakumar, M. Lekeshmanaswamy & K. Dhanalakshmi (Eds.), Jayanthi College of Education seminar on current perspective on education, Tamil Nadu (pp. 229–239). India: Jayanthi College of Education.
23.
KyriakidesA. O.MavrotherisM. M.ProdromouT. (2016).
Mobile technologies in the service of students’ learning of mathematics: The example of game application A.L.E.X. in the context of a primary school in Cyprus. Mathematics Education Research Journal,
28(1), 53–78.
24.
LoongE. Y. K.HerbertS. (2018).
Primary school teachers’ use of digital technology in mathematics: The complexities. Mathematics Education Research Journal,
30(4), 475–498.
25.
MahmudiJ.NalchigarS.EbrahimiS. B. (2008).
Challenges of smart schools in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations,
7(27), 78–61.
26.
MalikN.ShanwalV. K. (2017).
A comparative study of traditional and smart classrooms in relation to their creativity and academic achievement. Integrated Journal of Social Sciences,
4(1), 15–19.
27.
MarcellusR.GhrayebO. (2002, June). Effects of smart classrooms on learning and teaching effectiveness: The students’ point of view. Presented to the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada.
28.
MenonA. (2015).
Effectiveness of smart classroom teaching on the achievement in chemistry of secondary school students. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 9(2), 115–120.
29.
MinW. O.BryantD. P.BryantB. R. (2019).
Effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research. Exceptionality. 24(2). doi:10.1080/09362835.2019.15.79723
30.
MurrayS.NuttallJ.MitchellJ. (2008).
Research into initial teacher education in Australia: A survey of the literature 1995–2004. Teaching and Teacher Education,
23, 225–239.
31.
NeurathR. A.StephensL. J. (2006).
The effect of using Microsoft Excel in a high school algebra class. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,
37(6), 721–727. doi:10.1080/00207390600989251
32.
OthmanM. A. (2007). Keberkesanan kaedah pengajaran berbantukan komputer di kalangan pelajar pencapaian akademik rendah bagi mata pelajaran geografi tingkatan 4 di Negeri Sembilan (thesis). Universiti Sains Malaysia [Effectiveness of using Computer Aided Teaching Methods Among Students of Low Academic Achievement in Grade 4 Geography Subjects in Negeri Sembilan. Thesis Doctor of Philosophy. Penang: University of Science Malaysia.], Malaysia.
33.
PelgrumW. J.DoornekampB. D. (2009). Indicators on ICT in primary and secondary education (IIPSE: EACEA-2007–3278/. 001-001).
Brussels, Belgium:
European Commission, Directorate General Education and Culture.
34.
PhoongS. Y.PhoongS. W.TanX. J. (2018).
A mediation analysis on level of education and economic growth. The Journal of Social Sciences Research,
6, 417–422. doi:10.1080/23311975.2018.1509424
35.
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597--599.
36.
SchacterJ.JoB. (2017).
Improving preschoolers’ mathematics achievement with tablets: A randomized controlled trial. Mathematics Education Research Journal,
29(3), 313–327. doi:10.1007/s13394-017-0203-9
37.
ShadaanP.LeongK. E. (2013).
Effectiveness of using GeoGebra on students understanding in learning circle. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology,
1(4), 1–11.
38.
ShaharuddinA.KhairiA. (2011). Pembangunan Web E-Pembelajaran Menggunakan Elemen Video dalam Topik ‘Work And Energy’ Berasaskan Teori Konstuktivisme Sosial [E-Learning Web Development Using Video Elements in the 'Work And Energy' Topic Based on the Project Paper on Social Constructivism] (Project Paper). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [University of Technology Malaysia] , Malaysia.
39.
Sharma, H. L. (2016). Effectiveness of EDUCOMP smart classroom teaching on achievement in mathematics at elementary level. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(6), 683--687.
40.
SmallhornM. (2017).
The flipped classroom: A learning model to increase student engagement not academic achievement. Student Success,
8(2), 43–53. doi:10.5204/ssj.v8i2.381
41.
SpectorJ. M., & The Smart Learning Futures Group. (2018).
Smart learning futures: A report from the 3rd US-China smart education conference. Smart Learning Environments,
5(5), 1–10.
42.
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279--282.
43.
TalebZ.HassanzadehF. (2015).
Toward smart school: A comparison between smart school and traditional school for mathematics learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,
171, 90–95.
44.
TakawaleN. N.KulkarniS. M. (2016).
Effectiveness of smart classroom over traditional classroom in terms of academic, achievement of students using statistical method. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering,
4(2), 2048–2052. doi:10.15680/IJIRCCE.2016.0402055
45.
TawM. Y. (2013). Hubungan di antara Tahap Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi (TMK) dengan tahap minat murid dalam pembelajaran Matematik KSSR di sebuah SJKC, Daerah Gombak [Relationship between Information Technology and Communication Technology (TMK) Levels and Student Interest in KSSR Mathematics Learning at a SJKC, Gombak District] (thesis). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris [Sultan Idris University of Education], Malaysia.
46.
ZameniF.KardanS. (2011).
Effect of using the information and communications technology on mathematics learning. Journal of Information and Communications Technology in Educational Sciences,
1(1), 23--38.
47.
ZenginY. (2017).
Investigating the use of the Khan Academy and mathematics software with a flipped classroom approach in mathematics teaching. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
20(2), 89–100.
48.
ZhonggenY.WangG. (2016).
Academic achievements and satisfaction of the clicker aided flipped business English writing class. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
19(2), 298.
49.
ZhuZ.YuM.RiezebosP. (2016).
A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments,
3(4), 2–17.
