Video recordings for student teaching field experiences have been utilized with student teachers (also known as teacher candidates) to (a) capture the demonstration of their lesson plans, (b) critique their abilities within the performance, and (c) share and rate experiences for internal and external evaluations by the state and other organizations. Many times, the recording, saving, grading, and sharing process was not efficient. Thus, the feedback cycle from the university supervisor to the teacher candidate was negatively impacted. However, one communication technology tool that has the potential to facilitate the feedback process is video annotation software. This communication technology uses the storage within a remote server, known also as a cloud, to store videos that include typed commentary that is in sync with the portion of the video recorded. A group of university supervisors piloted a video annotation tool during student teaching to rate its effectiveness. Through a survey, the participants addressed how they perceived the implementation of the video annotation tool within the student teaching experience. Results suggest a video annotated technology-based supervision method is feasible and effective if paired with effective training and technical support.
BighamS. G.HivelyD. E.TooleG. H. (2014).
Principals’ and cooperating teachers’ expectations of teacher candidates. Education,
135(2), 211–229.
5.
CoghlanA. T.PreskillH.CatsambasT. T. (2003). An overview of appreciative inquiry in evaluation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Digital Archives. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.96
6.
ColasanteM. (2011).
Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,
27(1), 66–88.
DanielowichR. M.McCarthyM. J. (2013).
Teacher educators as learners: How supervisors shape their pedagogies by creating and using classroom videos with their student teachers. Action in Teacher Education,
35, 147–164. doi:10.1080/01626620.2013.806231
9.
DymondS.RenzagliaA.HalleJ.ChadseyJ.BentzJ. (2008).
An evaluation of videoconferencing as a supportive technology for practicum supervision. Teacher Education and Special Education,
31(4), 243–256.
EngestromY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki.
12.
EngestromY. (1990). Learning, working and imaging. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
13.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001).
Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education,
52(1), 17–34.
14.
FinnJ. D.PannozzoG. M. (2004).
Classroom organization and student behavior in kindergarten. The Journal of Educational Research,
98(2), 79–92.
15.
FreireP. (1970).
On Paulo Freire’s philosophy of praxis and the foundations of liberation education. Educational Researcher,
30(2), 15–25.
16.
FullanM. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.).
New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
17.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.).
New York, NY:
Teachers Press.
HartshorneR.HefnerT.PettyT. (2011).
Examining the effectiveness of the remote observation of graduate interns. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,
19(4), 395–422.
20.
KopchaT.AlgerC. (2014).
Student teacher communication and performance during a clinical experience supported by a technology-enhanced cognitive apprenticeship. Computers & Education,
72, 48–58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.011
21.
KoschmannT. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. Paper presented at the CSCL 1999,
Palo Alto,
California.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006a).
From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Research,
35(7), 3–12.
24.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006b). Yes, but how do we do it. Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations, and eliminating racism (pp. 29–42). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
25.
MirriahiN.LiaqatD.DawsonS.GasevicD. (2016).
Uncovering student learning profiles with a video annotation tool: Reflective learning with and without instructional norms. Education Tech Research Development,
64, 1083–1106. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9449-2
26.
OliveroJ. L. (1980). Microteaching: Medium for improving instruction.
New York, NY:
Charles Merrill and Company.
RichP.HannafinM. (2009).
Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education,
60, 52–67. doi:10.1177/0022487108328486
29.
RooneyD. (2005).
Knowledge, economy, technology and society: The politics of discourse. Telematics and Informatics,
22(4), 405–422.
30.
SchmidtM.GageA. M.GageN.CoxP.McLeskeyJ. (2015).
Bringing the field to the super the field to the supervisor: Innovation in distance supervision for field-based experiences using mobile technologies. Rural Special Education Quarterly,
34(1), 37–43. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1678624758?accountid=12610
StapletonJ.RinglerM.BrinkleyJ.CuthrellK. (2015). Using principal candidates to implement face to face and virtual instructional coaching in a junior level practicum.
Atlanta, GA:
AACTE.
33.
StevensR. (2007). Capturing ideas in digital things: A new twist on the old problem of inert knowledge. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 547–563). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34.
TeschF.CoelhoD.DrozdenkoR. (2011).
We have met the enemy and he is us: Relative potencies of classroom distractions. Elm Street Press,
3(2), 13–19.
35.
ThobegaM.MillerG. (2008).
Perceptions of supervision practices: Agricultural education: Student teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education,
49(3), 65–75.
Van BoxtelJ. M. (2017).
Seeing is believing: Innovating the clinical practice experience for education specialist teacher candidates with video-based remote supervision. Rural Special Education Quarterly,
36(4), 180–190. doi:10.1177/8756870517737313
38.
VygotskyL. V. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
39.
WhippJ. L. (2003).
Helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experiences in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education,
54(4), 321–333. doi:10.1177/0022487103255010
40.
YoungM. R.KlemzB. R.MurphyJ. W. (2003).
Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education,
25(2), 130–142.
