As the construction industry advances technologically, it becomes imperative to introduce the respective information technology tools to present-day curriculum. This research study was conducted to identify any significant differences in student performance contributed by using an information technology tool, specifically the Apple® iPad® tablet. IPad tablets were used to electronically present construction drawings to a treatment group, and a control group was given traditional paper drawings. Following an instructional lecture, students were given a test based on the provided construction drawings. The test results indicate that there was no significant difference in performance between students who used the information technology tool to complete the test and those who used traditional paper drawings to complete the same test. The treatment group also answered a usability survey, which helped to comprehend how students perceive the tablet’s usability. Students indicated that they would like to use the tool in the future.
AbaffyL. (2011).
iPads and tablets: Time saved vs. time spent. ENR: Engineering News-Record,
267(9), 20–20.
2.
AzharS.CoxA. J. (2015, April 22–25). Impact of mobile tools and technologies on jobsite operations. Paper presented at the 51st Annual International Conference Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), College Station, TX.
3.
AzharS.JacksonA.SattineniA. (2015). Construction apps: A critical review and analysis. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Vilnius, Lithuania.
4.
BangorA.KortumP. T.MillerJ. T. (2008).
An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction,
24(6), 574–594. doi:10.1080/10447310802205776
BrookeJ. (1996).
SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale.Usability Evaluation in Industry,
189 (194), 4–7.
7.
BrookeJ. (2013).
SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies,
8(2), 29–40.
8.
Cabero, J. (2001). Educational Technology: Design, Production and Evaluation of Media. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Paidos.
9.
CaldwellH.BirdJ. (2015). Teaching with tablets.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
10.
ClineR. C.DavisK. A. (2013). Using mobile technology in a construction management “Hands-On” laboratory. Age, 23, 1.
11.
ConoleG.de LaatM.DillonT.DarbyJ. (2008).
‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology.Computers & Education,
50(2), 511–524. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
HosseiniR.ChilesheN.ZouJ.BaroudiB. (2013).
Approaches of implementing ICT technologies within the construction industry.Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building-Conference Series,
1(2), 1–12.
14.
KennewellS.BeauchampG. (2007).
The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning.Learning, Media and Technology,
32(3), 227–241. doi:10.1080/17439880701511073
MockK. (2004).
Teaching with tablet PC’s. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges,
20(2), 17–27.
17.
Noor-Ul-AminS. (2013).
An effective use of ICT for education and learning by drawing on worldwide knowledge, research, and experience: ICT as a change agent for education. Scholarly Journal of Education,
2(4), 38–45.
PattersonL. J. (2014). A prototype goal oriented construction prototype management application for owners.
Atlanta, GA:
Georgia Institute of Technology.
20.
ReyesM. D.GhoshS.PerrenoudA. J.GoldmanJ. A. (2015, April 22–25). Teaching plan reading to construction students: The effect of using tablet computers. Paper presented at the 51st Annual International Conference Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), College Station, TX.
21.
RojasE. M.SongerA. D. (1999).
Web-centric systems: A new paradigm for collaborative engineering.Journal of Management in Engineering,
15(1), 39–45. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:1(39)
22.
RuddockL. (2006).
ICT in the construction sector: Computing the economic benefits. International Journal of Strategic Property Management,
10(1), 39–50. doi:10.1080/1648715X.2006.9637543
23.
ShresthaP. P.ShieldsD. R.OparaugoD. A.PradhanangaN. (2011).
Comparative study of information technology use by architects, engineers and contractors. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture,
5(5), 375–388.
24.
SonH.ParkY.KimC.ChouJ.-S. (2012).
Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model.Automation in Construction,
28, 82–90.
25.
TaoL. Q. W. (2012).
Study on research and application of tablet apps for special education [J]. Modern Educational Technology,
8, 025.
WuP.FengY.PienaarJ.ZhongY. (2015).
Educational attainment and job requirements: Exploring the gaps for construction graduates in Australia from an industry point of view.Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice,
141(4). doi:06015001-06015001-06015001-06015006
