Within an online science teacher education course, an important although secondary goal was to prepare students for a high-stakes licensure portfolio at some time after course completion. Thus, various communication technologies including synchronous virtual reality meetings and asynchronous student self-created video commentaries were interwoven to foster a community of problem solvers. This study examines the several technology-communication venues for evidence of student interpersonal communications and emerging content knowledge concluding with ways these communication tools might effectively support productive learning communities and engender professional yet “safe” and trusting environments in online and blended course environments.
BarberW.KingS.BuchananS. (2015) Problem based learning and authentic assessment in digital pedagogy: Embracing the role of collaborative communities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning13(2): 59–67.
2.
BarkerV. (2016) Flow in virtual worlds: The interplay of community and site features as predictors of involvement. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research9(3): 1–17.
3.
BinnsI.PoppS. (2013) Learning to teach science through inquiry: Experiences of preservice teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education17(1): 1–24.
4.
Bishop, C., & Hong, R. (2012). Building community: Effective strategies to increase interaction in online learning. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1106–1111). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
5.
ChertoffD. B.SchatzS. L.McDanielR.BowersC. A. (2008) Improving presence theory through experiential design. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments17(4): 405–413.
6.
CronenbergS.HarrisonD.JonesA.Murray-EverttN.ParrishM.Johnston-ParsonsM. (2016) Trouble with the edTPA: Lesson learned from a narrative self-study. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education8(1): 109–134.
7.
EggsC. (2012) Trust building in a virtual context: Case study of a community of practice. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management10(3): 212–222.
8.
GarrisonD.ArbaughJ. (2007) Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education10(3): 157–172.
Macharaschwili, C., & Skidmore, L. (2013). A skype-buddy model for blended learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(2), 167–190. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
12.
MaloneyS.StorrM.MorganP.IlicD. (2013) The effect of student self-video of performance on clinical skill competency: A randomised controlled trial. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice18(1): 81–89.
13.
MartinA. (2014) Motivating learners with virtual reality. In: ViteliJ.LeikomaaM. (eds) Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2014, Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 2631–2636.
14.
McArdleG.MonahanT.BertolottoM. (2007) Using virtual reality to learn and socialise online. In: MontgomerieC.SealeJ. (eds) Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2007, Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 4225–4234.
15.
O’ConnorE. A. (2010) Instructional and design elements that support effective use of virtual worlds: What graduate student work reveals about second life. Journal of Educational Technology Systems38(2): 213–234.
16.
O’ConnorE. A.DomingoJ. (2017) A practical guide, with theoretical underpinnings, for creating effective virtual reality learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology Systems45(3): 343–364.
17.
RichardsonJ. J.LowenthalP. P. (2017) Instructor social presence: A neglected component of the community of inquiry. Elearning & Software for Education2: 2531–2536.
18.
SmithS. (2016) (Re)Counting meaningful learning experiences: Using student-created reflective videos to make invisible learning visible during PjBL experiences. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning10(1): 2–16.
19.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key elements of building online community: Comparing faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 234–246.
22.
VezinaN.IsaBelleC.FournierH.DufresneA.DoucetJ. J. (2004) 3D virtual reality, motivation, sense of belonging and perseverance. In: CantoniL.McLoughlinC. (eds) Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2004, Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 1677–1682.
23.
VygotskyL. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
WildeJ. (2010) More than a place to meet (virtually): What educators tell us about second life. In: HerringtonJ.MontgomerieC. (eds) Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2010, Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 3866–3874.
25.
WoodsB.WhitworthE.HadziomerovicA.FisetJ. P.DormannC.CaquardS.BiddleR. (2005) Repurposing a computer role playing game for engaging learning. In: KommersP.RichardsG. (eds) Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2005, Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 4430–4435.
26.
YücelU.UsluelY. (2016) Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education97: 31–48.
