Understanding the factors that affect participation in online games will help educational game designers develop games that maximize participation. This study investigated whether introversion or extroversion, player motivation, and gender affected participation in online games. Participants (n = 400) completed a 50-item questionnaire about introversion or extroversion, player motivation, and time spent playing games. A three-way analysis of variance was used to explore the effects of personality, player motivation, and gender on participation. Introverts spent 6.7 more hours playing games than extroverts, and a significant interaction effect was found between personality and gender. The implications of these findings are presented.
AlaswadZ.NadolnyL. (2015) Designing for game-based learning: The effective integration of technology to support learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems43(4): 389–402. doi:10.1177/0047239515588164.
2.
Al-DujailyA.KimJ.RyuH. (2013) Am I extravert or introvert? Considering the personality effect toward e-learning system. Educational Technology & Society3: 14, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.3.14.
3.
AlyazY.GencZ. S. (2016) Digital game-based language learning in foreign language teacher education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education17(4): 130–146. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1116837.pdf.
4.
BorupJ.WestR.GrahamC. (2013) The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: A narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education34(1): 48–63. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.77042.
5.
ChiaP. (2013) Using a virtual game to enhance simulation based learning in nursing education. Singapore Nursing Journal40(3): 21–26. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1116837.
6.
Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2014). Personality based gamification-educational gamification for extroverts and introverts. In Proceedings of the 9th CHAIS Conference for the Study of Innovation and Learning Technologies: Learning in the Technological Era (Vol. 1, pp. 36–44). Retrieved from http://www.openu.ac.il/innovation/chais2014/download/E2-2.pdf.
7.
ColeH.GriffithsM. (2007) Social interactions in massively multiplayer online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior10(4): 575–583. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9988.
8.
EbbsM. (2016) From Candy Crush to Catan: One student's perspective on the benefits of gaming in academia. CEA Forum45(1): 101–110. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107076.
9.
EllisA. E. (2003) Personality type and participation in networked learning environments. Education Media International40(1): 101–115. doi:10.1080/0952398032000092152.
EysenckH. (2009) The biological basis of personality, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.(Original work published 1967).
12.
FriedlK. E.O'NeilH. F. (2013) Designing and using computer simulations in medical education and training: An introduction. Military Medicine178(10 Suppl): 1–6. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00209.
13.
GrahamL. T.GoslingS. D. (2013) Personality profiles associated with different motivations for playing World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking16(3): 189–193. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0090.
HoviousA. S.Van EckR. N. (2015) Digital games for 21st-century learning: Teacher librarians' beliefs and practices. Teacher Librarian5: 34, Retrieved from teacherlibrarian.com.
16.
JaggerS.SialaH.SloanD. (2016) It's all in the game: A 3d learning model for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics137(2): 383–403. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2557-9.
17.
JusticeL. J.RitzhauptA. D. (2015) Identifying the barriers to games and simulations in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems44(1): 86–125. doi:10.1177/0047239515588161.
18.
KuoY. C.WalkerA. E.BellandB. R.SchroderK. E. (2013) A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning14(1): 16–39. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008076.
19.
LiaoY.HuangY.WangY. (2015) Factors affecting students’ continued usage intention toward business simulation games. Journal of Educational Computing Research53(2): 260–283. doi:10.1177/0735633115598751.
20.
SheldonL. (2012) The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game, Boston, MA: Course Technology/Cengage Learning.
21.
SullivanG. M.ArtinoA. R. (2013) Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education5(4): 541–542. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
22.
Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2013). Does greater participation in online courses lead to passing grade? An EFL learning context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6). doi:10.1111/bjet.12095.
Wright, K. (2004). The relationship between extroversion/introversion and the preferred time of day to work. Texas Women’s University. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com.
