This article describes a multisensory presentation and response system for enhancing the spelling ability of dyslexic children. The unique aspect of MAGICSpell is its system of finger–letter associations and simplified keyboard configuration. Sixteen 10- and 11-year-old dyslexic students practiced the finger–letter associations via various typing games. They then were tested on the spelling of four-letter words with the “er” sound bordered on each end by a consonant. A pretest revealed that the students spelled the target words correctly 3% of the time. After practice with MAGICSpell, the correct responses rose to 84% for the practiced words. The students also significantly increased correct responses for nonpracticed words of the same spelling pattern. This trend held for both typing with the MAGICSpell configuration and writing responses.
AdamsM. J. (1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2.
AlberS. R.WalsheS. E. (2004) When to self-correct spelling words: A systematic replication. Journal of Behavioral Education13: 51–66.
3.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. (1974) Working memory. In: BowerG. H. (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 8. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 47–89.
5.
BaraF.GentazE.ColeP. (2007) Haptics in learning to read with children from low socio-economic status families. British Journal of Developmental Psychology25: 643–663.
6.
BeckerA.McLaughlinT. F.WeberK. P.GowerJ. (2009) The effects of copy, cover, and compare with and without error drill on multiplication fact fluency and accuracy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology18: 747–760.
7.
BentonA. L. (1955) Development of finger localization capacity in school children. Child Development26: 225–230.
8.
BentonA. L.HutcheonJ. F.SeymourE. (1951) Arithmetic ability, finger-localization capacity and right-left discrimination in normal and defective children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry21(4): 756–766.
9.
BernazzaA.BloomerR.ClineM. (1971) An experimental test of a first-grade reading-typewriting program. In: SchickG.MayM. (eds) Reading process and pedagogy. Nineteenth yearbook of the national reading conference, Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference, pp. 224–236.
10.
BerningerV. W.MizokawaD. T.BraggR. (1991) Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology29: 57–59.
11.
BerningerV. W.VaughanK. B.AbbottR. D.AbbotS. P.RoganL.BrooksW.GrahamA. S. (1997) Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology89: 652–666.
12.
BerningerW.VaughanK. A.AbbottR. D.BrooksA.AbbottS. P.RoganL.GrahamS. (1998) Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. Journal of Educational Psychology90(4): 587–605.
13.
BlauH.LovelessE. J. (1982) Specific hemispheric-routing TAK/v to teach spelling to dyslexics: VAK and VAKT challenged. Journal of Learning Disabilities15: 461–466.
14.
BlissJ. C.CraneH. D.MansfieldP. K.TownsendJ. T. (1966) Information available in brief tactile presentation. Perception & Psychophysics1: 273–283.
15.
BradleyL. (1981) The organization of motor patterns for spelling: An effective remedial strategy for backward readers. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology23: 83–91.
16.
BradleyL.BryantP. (1985) Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Braille, L. (1829). Method of writing words, music, and plain songs by means of dots, for use by the blind and arranged for them. Paris, France: National Institute for Blind Children.
18.
BrownJ. A. (1958) Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology10: 12–21.
CalvertG. A.SpenceC.SteinB. E. (2004) The handbook of multisensory processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
ClarkJ. M.PaivioA. (1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review3(3): 149–170.
22.
ConradE. U. (1935) Study of the influence of manuscript writing and of typewriting on children’s development. Journal of Educational Research29: 254–265.
23.
Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Statistical learning within and across modalities: Abstract versus stimulus-specific representations. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 488–493). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
CookeN. L.SleeJ. M.YoungC. A. (2008) How is contextualized spelling used to support reading in first-grade core reading programs. Reading Improvement45(1): 26–45.
25.
CooperB. (2002) The use of sign language to teach reading to kindergartners. The Reading Teacher56: 116–119.
26.
CortisC.DentK.KennettS.WardG. (2015) First things first: Similar list length and output order effects for verbal and non-verbal stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition41(4): 1179–1214.
27.
CrumpM. J. C.LoganG. D. (2010) Hierarchical control and skilled typing: Evidence for word-level control over the execution of individual keystrokes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition36: 1369–1380.
28.
DanielsM. (2001) Dancing with words: Signing for hearing children’s literacy, Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
29.
Davis, R. D. (1992). 37 Common characteristics of dyslexia. Retrieved from Davis Dyslexia Association International, Dyslexia the Gift http://www.dyslexia.com/library/symptoms.htm.
30.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B.AlleyG. R.WarnerM.ClarkF. L. (1982) Learning disabilities in adolescent and young adult populations: Research implications (Part I). Focus on Exceptional Children15(1): 1–12.
31.
Edelsky, C. (1990). Whole language in perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 548–550.
32.
FawcettA. J.NicolsonR. I.DeanP. (1996) Impaired performance of children with dyslexia on a range of cerebellar tasks. Annals of Dyslexia46: 259–283.
33.
FernaldG. (1943) Remedial techniques in basic school subjects, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
34.
FinlaysonM. A. J.ReitanR. M. (1976) Tactile-perceptual functioning in relation to intellectual, cognitive and reading skills in younger and older normal children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology18(4): 442–446.
35.
FoormanB. R.SchatschneiderC.EakinM. N.FletcherJ. M.MoatsL. C.FrancisD. J. (2006) The impact of instructional practices in grades one and two on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology31: 1–29.
36.
FrithU. (1980) Unexpected spelling problems. In: FrithU. (ed.) Cognitive processes in spelling, London, England: Academic Press, pp. 495–515.
37.
FulkB. M.Stormont-SpurginM. (1995) Fourteen spelling strategies for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic11: 16–20.
38.
GallaceA.SpenceC. (2009) The cognitive and neural correlates of tactile memory. Psychological Bulletin135(3): 380–406.
39.
GallaceA.TanH. Z.SpenceC. (2007) The body surface as a communication system: The state of art after 50 years of research. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments16: 655–676.
40.
GeldardF. A. (1957) Adventures in tactile literacy. American Psychologist12(3): 115–124.
41.
GentazE.ColéP.BaraF. (2003) Evaluation d’entranements multisensoriels de préparation à la lecturepour les enfants en grande section de maternelle: Une étude sur la contribution du système haptique manuel. L’Année Psychologique104: 561–584.
42.
GerberM. (1986) Generalization of spelling strategies by LD students as a result of contingent imitation/modeling and mastery criteria. Journal of Learning Disabilities19: 530–537.
43.
GiessS.RiversK. O.KennedyK.LombardinoL. J. (2012) Effects of a multisensory phonics-based training on the word recognition and spelling skills of adolescents with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education27: 60–73.
44.
GilsonE. Q.BaddeleyA. (1969) Tactile short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A. Human Experimental Psychology21(2): 180–184.
45.
GordenJ.VaughnS.SchummJ. S. (1999) Spelling interventions: A review of literature and implications for instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice8(3): 175–181.
46.
GoswamiU.BryantP. (1990) Phonological skills and learning to read, East Sussex, England: Erlbaum.
47.
GottfriedJ. A.SmithA. P.RuggM. D.DolanR. J. (2004) Remembrance of odors past: human olfactory cortex in cross-modal recognition memory. Neuron42: 687–695.
48.
GrahamS. (1983) Effective spelling instruction. The Elementary School Journal83(5): 560–567.
49.
GrahamS. (2000) Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology92(2): 235–247.
50.
GrahamS.BerningerV.AbbottR.AbbottS.WhitakerD. (1997) Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology89: 170–182.
51.
GrahamS.FreemanS. (1986) Strategy training and teacher vs. student controlled study conditions: Effects on LD student’s spelling performance. Learning Disabilities Quarterly9: 15–22.
52.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.Fink-ChorzempaB. (2002) Contributions of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology94: 669–686.
53.
GrahamS.HarrisK.MacarthurC.SchwartzS. (1991) Writing instruction. In: WongB. Y. L. (ed.) Learning about learning disabilities, London, England: Academic Press, pp. 309–343.
54.
GrahamS.MorphyP.HarrisK. R.Fink-ChorzempaB.SaddlerB.MoranS.MasonL. (2008) Teaching spelling in the primary grades: A national survey of instructional practices and adaptations. American Educational Research Journal45: 796–825.
55.
GrahamS.WeintraubN. (1996) A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review8: 7–87.
56.
HaefnerR. (1937) The typewriter and the three R’s. American School Board Journal95: 28–30.
57.
HandelS.BuffardiL. (1969) Using several modalities to perceive one temporal pattern. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology21: 256–266.
58.
Hartcher-O’BrienJ.GallaceA.KringsB.KoppenC.SpenceC. (2008) When vision ‘extinguishes’ touch in neurologically normal people: Extending the Colavita visual dominance effect. Experimental Brain Research186: 643–658.
59.
HellerM. A. (1989) Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and blind: The advantage of the late blind. Perception18: 379–389.
60.
HeronT. E.OkyereB. A.MillerA. D. (1991) A taxonomy of approaches to teach spelling. Journal of Behavioral Education1: 117–130.
61.
HootJ. (1986) Keyboarding instruction in the early grades: Must or mistake. Childhood Education63(2): 95–101.
62.
JoshiR.TreimanR.CarrekerS.MoatsL. (2008–2009, Winter) The real magic of spelling: Improving reading and writing. American Educator32(4): 9.
63.
KaakeD. (1983) Teaching elementary age children touch typing as an aid to language arts instruction. The Reading Teacher36(7): 640–644.
64.
KamhiA.HintonL. (2000) Explaining individual differences in spelling ability. Topics in Language Disorders20: 37–50.
65.
KearneyC. A.DrabmanR. S. (1992) The write-say method of improving spelling accuracy in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities26: 52–56.
66.
KeeleS. W. (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review70: 387–403.
67.
KeeleS. W.CohenA.IvryR. (1990) Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In: JeannerodM. (ed.) Attention and performance XIII, New York, NY: Erlbaum.
68.
KimR. S.SeitzA. R.ShamsL. (2008) Benefits of stimulus congruency for multisensory facilitation of visual learning. PLoS ONE3(1): e1532.
69.
KinsbourneM.WarringtonE. K. (1963) The relevance of delayed acquisition of finger sense to backwardness in reading and writing. Little Club Clinics in Developmental Medicine10: 62–64.
70.
KokotS. (2003) A neurodevelopmental approach to learning disabilities: Diagnosis and treatment. In: MontgomeryD. (ed.) Gifted and talented children with SEN: Double exceptionality, London, England: NACE/Fulton, pp. 7–24.
71.
KrashenS. (1989) We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal73(4): 440–464.
72.
LeffordA.BirchH. G.GreenG. (1974) The perceptual and cognitive bases for finger localization and selective finger movement in preschool children. Child Development45(2): 335–343.
73.
LehmannS.MurrayM. M. (2005) The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. Cognitive Brain Research24: 326–334.
74.
LennoxC.SiegelL. S. (1996) The development of phonological rules and visual strategies in average and poor spellers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology62: 60–83.
75.
LennoxC.SiegelL. S. (1998) Phonological and orthographic processes in good and poor spellers. In: HulmeC.JoshiR. M. (eds) Reading and spelling: Development and disorders, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 395– 404.
76.
LiuX.CrumpM. J. C.LoganG. D. (2010) Do you know where your fingers have been explicit knowledge of the spatial layout of the keyboard in skilled typists?Memory & Cognition38: 474–484.
77.
LoganG. D.CrumpM. J. C. (2009) The left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing: The disruptive effects of attention to the hands in skilled typewriting. Psychological Science20: 1296–1300.
78.
LoganG. D.CrumpM. J. C. (2011) Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: The case for skilled typewriting. In: RossB. H. (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 54. Burlington, MA: Academic Press, pp. 1–27.
79.
LoomerB.FitzsimmonsR.StregeM. (1990) Spelling research and practice: Teacher’s edition, Iowa City, IA: Useful Learning.
80.
MaharD.MackenzieB.McNicolD. (1994) Modality-specific differences in the processing of spatially, temporally, and spatiotemporally distributed information. Perception23: 1369–1386.
81.
MahrerP.MilesC. (1999) Memorial and strategic determinants of tactile recency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition25: 630–643.
82.
Mahrer, P. & Miles, C. (2002). Recognition for tactile sequences? Memory. 10(1), 7–20.
83.
ManningS. K. (1980) Tactual and visual alphanumeric suffix effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32: 257–267.
84.
ManningS. K.PasqualiP. E.SmithC. A. (1975) Effects of visual and tactual stimulus presentation on learning two-choice patterned and semi-random sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory1: 736–744.
85.
MayerR. E.MorenoR. (2002) Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review14: 87–99.
86.
MayerR. E.SimsV. K. (1994) For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology86: 289–401.
87.
McIntyreE. (1995) Teaching and learning writing skills in a low-SES urban primary classroom. Journal of Reading Behavior27: 213–242.
88.
McLaughlinT. F.SkinnerC. H. (1996) Improving, academic performance through self-management: Cover, copy and compare. Intervention in School & Clinic32(2): 113–118.
89.
McNaughtonD.HughesC.ClarkK. (1997) The effect of five proofreading conditions on the spelling performance of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities30: 643–651.
90.
MembreyA.McLaughlinT. F.DerbyK. M.AntcliffC. (2011) A modification of cover, copy, and compare in spelling for three middle school students with multiple disabilities. International Journal of Social Science and Education1(4): 491–505.
91.
Metcalf, D., Evans, C., Flynn, H.K., & Williams, J.B. (2009). Direct instruction + UDL = access for diverse learners: How to plan and implement an effective multisensory spelling lesson. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 5(6), article 2.
MillarS. (1975a) Effects of tactual and phonological similarity on the recall of Braille letters by blind children. British Journal of Psychology66: 193–201.
94.
MillarS. (1975b) Effects of phonological and tactual similarity on serial object recall by blind and sighted children. Cortex11: 170–180.
95.
MillerG.GalanterE.PribramK. (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior, New York, NY: Holt.
96.
MoatsL. C. (1995) Spelling: Development, disability, and instruction, Baltimore, MD: York Press.
97.
MoserL. A.FishleyK. M.KonradM.HesslerT. (2012) Effects of the copy-cover-compare strategy on acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of spelling sight words for elementary students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy34(2): 93–110.
98.
MurphyE. (1990) The effects of tactile and kinesthetic learning in improving spelling performance of a special education student. Reading Improvement27(Fall): 207–211.
99.
MurphyJ.HernC.McLaughlinT. F.WilliamsR. L. (1990) The effects of the copy, cover, and compare approach to increasing spelling accuracy with learning disabled students. Contemporary Educational Psychology15: 378–386.
100.
MurrayM. M.MichelC. M.Grave De PeraltaR.OrtigueS.BrunetD.Gonzalez AndinoS.SchniderA. (2004) Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging. NeuroImage21: 125–135.
101.
MurrayA. D.StaffR. T.ShenkinS. D.DearyI. J.StarrJ. M.WhalleyL. J. (2005) Brain white matter hyper-intensities: relative importance of vascular risk factors in non-demented elderly people. Radiology237: 251–257.
102.
NairneI. S.McNabbW. L. (1985) More modality effects in the absence of sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & CognitionII: 596–604.
103.
Nijakowska, J. (2001, January). Teaching English as a foreign language to a Polish dyslexic child—A case study. Paper presented at the 5th BDA International Conference, University of York, UK.
104.
NybergL.HabibR.McIntoshA. R.TulvingE. (2000) Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA97: 11120–11124.
105.
OaklandT.BlackJ. L.StanfordC.NussbaumN. L.BaliseR. R. (1998) An evaluation of the dyslexia training program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities31(2): 140–147.
106.
OfmanW.ShaevitzM. (1963) The kinesthetic method in remedial reading. Journal of Experimental Education31: 317–320.
107.
OrtonS. T. (1937) Reading, writing, and speech problems in children, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
108.
PaivioA. (1986) Mental representations, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
109.
PaivioA. (1990) Mental representations: A dual coding approach, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
110.
Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., & Fayol, M. (Eds.) (1997). Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
111.
PetersonL. R.PetersonM. J. (1959) Short-term retention of individual items. Journal of Experimental Psychology58: 193–198.
112.
PoncyB. C.SkinnerC. H.JaspersK. E. (2007) Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math-fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education16(1): 27–37.
113.
PoplinM. S.GrayR.LarsenS.BanikowskiA.MehringT. (1980) A comparison of components of written expression abilities in learning disabled and non-learning disabled students at three grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly3: 46–53.
114.
Ramos-EstebanezC.MerabetL. B.MachiiK.FregniF.ThutG.WagnerT. A.Pascual-LeoneA. (2007) Visual phosphene perception modulated by sub-threshold cross-modal sensory stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience27: 4178–4181.
115.
RankinJ. L.BruningR. H.TimmeV. L.KatkanantC. (1993) Is writing affected by spelling performance and beliefs about spelling. Applied Cognitive Psychology7(2): 155–169.
116.
RobertsR.MatherN. (1997) Orthographic dyslexia: The neglected subtype. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice12: 236–250.
RosenbaumD. A.CohenR. G.JaxS. A.WeissD. J.van der WelR. (2007) The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley’s legacy. Human Movement Science26: 525–554.
119.
RoweJ. L. (1959) Readin’, typin’, and’ rithmetic. Business World Education9: 9–12.
120.
SadoskiM.GoetzE. T.AvilaE. (1995) Concreteness effects in text recall: Dual coding or context availability. Reading Research Quarterly30(2): 278–288.
121.
SadoskiM.PaivioA.GoetzE. T. (1991) A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly26: 463–484.
122.
SalthouseT. A. (1986) Perceptual, cognitive,and motoric aspects of transcription typing. Psychological Bulletin99: 303–319.
123.
SavolainenH.AhonenT.AroM.TolvanenA.HolopainenL. (2008) Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education. Learning & Instruction18(2): 201–210.
124.
SchermerhornP. K.McLaughlinT. F. (1997) Effects of the add-a-word spelling program on test accuracy, grades, and retention of spelling words with fifth and sixth grade regular education students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy19(1): 23–35.
125.
SeidenbergM. S.McClellandJ. L. (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review96: 523–568.
126.
Seime, C., Quigley, D., & Starner, T. (2014). Passive haptic learning of typing skills facilitated by wearable computers. In CHI 2014, Apr 26 – May 01, 2014, Toronto, ON, Canada. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2559206.2581329.
127.
SeitzA.KimR.ShamsL. (2006) Sound facilitates visual learning. Current Biology16: 1422–1427.
128.
ShamsL.SeitzA. (2008) Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences12(11): 411–417.
129.
ShaywitzS. E. (1998) Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine338(5): 307–312.
130.
ShimojoS.ShamsL. (2001) Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology11(4): 505–509.
131.
SimonS. A. (2008) Merging of the senses. Frontiers of Neuroscience2: 13–14.
132.
SimonsenF.GunterL. (2001, Summer) Best practices in spelling instruction: A research summary. Journal of Direct Instruction1: 97–110.
133.
SkarrA.McLaughlinT. F.DerbyK. M.MeadeK.WilliamsR. L. (2012) A comparison of direct instruction flashcards and cover, copy, compare to teach spelling to elementary school students. Academic Research International2(2): 247–263.
134.
SkinnerC. H.McLaughlinT. F.LoganP. (1997) Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education7(3): 295–306.
135.
SnyderK. M.LoganG. D. (2014) The problem of serial order in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance40: 1697–1717.
136.
SnyderK. M.AshitakaY.ShimadaH.UlrichJ. E.LoganG. D. (2014) What skilled typists don’t know about the QWERTY keyboard. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics76: 162–171.
137.
SteffensenM. S.GoetzE. T.ChengX. (1999) The images and emotions of bilingual Chinese readers: A dual coding analysis. Reading Psychology2: 301–324.
138.
StraussA. A.WernerH. (1938) Deficiency in the finger schema in relation to arithmetic disability. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry8(1938): 719–725.
139.
SullivanE. V.TurveyM. T. (1972) Short-term retention of tactile stimulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology24: 253–261.
140.
TerryW. S. (2009) Learning and memory: Basic principles, processes, and procedures, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
141.
ThompsonM. (1990) Dyslexia and development, 3rd ed. London, England: Whurr.
142.
TreichlerD. G. (1967) Are you missing the boat in training aids?Film and Audio-Visual Communication1: 14–16.
143.
TreimanR.BourassaD. C. (2000) The development of spelling skill. Topics in Language Disorders20: 1–18.
144.
von KriegsteinK.GiraudA. L. (2006) Implicit multisensory associations influence voice recognition. PLoS Biology4(10): e326.
145.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.WexlerJ.SwansonE. A.EdmondsM.KimA. (2006) A synthesis of spelling and reading intervention and their effects on spelling outcomes of student with LD. Journal of Learning Disability39(6): 528–543.
146.
WatkinsM. J.WatkinsO. C. (1974) A tactile suffix effect. Memory & Cognition2: 176–180.
147.
WestT. (1991) In the mind’s eye: Visual thinkers, gifted people with learning difficulties, computer images and the ironies of creativity, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
148.
WhitingP. R.ChapmanE. (2000) Evaluation of a computer-based program to teach reading and spelling to students with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities5(4): 11–17.
149.
WilsonR.TeagueJ.TeagueM. (1985) The use of signing and fingerspelling to improve spelling performance with hearing children. Reading Psychology4: 267–273.
150.
WoodB. O.FreemanF. N. (1932) Experimental study of the educational influences of the typewriter in the elementary school classroom, Chicago, IL: Macmillan.
151.
WurmT. (1986) Teaching sight words with sign language. Reading Teacher39(7): 744–745.
152.
ZaragozaN.VaughnS. (1992) The effects of process writing instruction on three second grade students with different achievement profiles. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice7: 184–193.
