How well does PowerPoint support learning outside class? This project answers this question by data mining a large dataset of 1,413 PowerPoint files from 54 professors. PowerPoint text and image data were combined with course and faculty data, as well as server logs indicating how many times each file was downloaded. The results show that slide images do not lead to increased downloads. Instead, slides with a large number of concise bullet points were downloaded at higher rates. This suggests that slide best practices need to be revisited for learning outside class.
AbelaA. V. (2008) Advanced presentations by design: Creating communication that drives action, San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
2.
AçikalinF. S. (2011) Why Turkish pre-service teachers prefer to see PowerPoint. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology10(3): 340–347.
3.
AdamsN. B. (2002) Educational computing concerns of postsecondary faculty. Journal of Research on Technology in Education34(3): 285–303.
4.
AlleyM.MadelineS.KatrinaR.JohnM. (2006) How the design of headlines in presentation slides affects audience retention. Technical Communication53(2): 225–234.
5.
AndersonT.StanleyV.KatyC. (1998) Faculty adoption of teaching and learning technologies: Contrasting earlier adopters and mainstream faculty. The Canadian Journal of Higher EducationXXVIII(2): 71–98.
6.
AppersonJ.LawsE.ScepanskyJ. (2008) An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers & Education50(1): 148–153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.003.
7.
AppersonJ. M.LawsE. L.ScepanskyJ. A. (2006) The impact of presentation graphics on students’ experience in the classroom. Computers & Education47: 116–126. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.003.
8.
BartschR.CobernK. (2003) Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education41(1): 77–86. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00027-7.
9.
BlokzijlW.NaeffR. (2004) The instructor as stagehand: Dutch student responses to PowerPoint. Business Communication Quarterly67(1): 70–77. doi:10.1177/1080569903262046.
BurkeL. A.JamesK. E. (2008) PowerPoint-based lectures in business education: An empirical investigation of student-perceived novelty and effectiveness. Business Communication Quarterly71(3): 277–296. doi:10.1177/1080569908317151.
12.
CorneliusT.Owen-DeSchryverJ. (2008) Differential effects of full and partial notes on learning outcomes and attendance. Teaching of Psychology35: 6–12.
DebevecK.ShihM. Y.KashyapV. (2006) Learning strategies and performance in a technology integrated classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education38(2): 293–307.
15.
DuarteN. (2008) Slide:ology - The art and science of creating great presentations, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
GrabeM. (2005) Voluntary use of online lecture notes: Correlates of note use and note use as an alternative to class attendance. Computers & Education44: 409–421.
19.
GrimstadK.GrabeM. (2004) Are online study questions beneficial?Teaching of Psychology31((2): 143–146.
20.
JamesK. E.BurkeL. A.HutchinsH. M. (2006) Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus student perceptions of PowerPoint use in business education. Business Communication Quarterly69(4): 374–396. doi:10.1177/1080569906294634.
21.
KahramanS.ÇevikC.KodanH. (2011) Investigation of university students’ attitude toward the use of PowerPoint according to some variables. Procedia Computer Science3: 1341–1347. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.013.
22.
KozubR. M. (2010) Student attitude towards and use of Powerpoint® slides as study guides in undergraduate introductory financial accounting. Journal of College Teaching and Learning7(3): 39–48.
LambC. K. (2014) ‘Bulletproof’: Injecting new life into slidware. Journal of Student Success and Retention1(1): 1–11.
25.
Mahar, S., Janicki, T. J., & Colton, D. (2009). Less is more when developing PowerPoint animations. Information Systems Educational Journal, 7(82). Retrieved from Http://isedj.org/7/82.
26.
MayerR. E. (2005a) Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In: MayerR. E. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MayerR. E. (2005b) Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In: MayerR. E. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MayerR. E.GriffithE. (2008) Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied14(4): 329–339. doi:10.1037/a0013835.
29.
MoserF. Z. (2007) Faculty adoption of educational technology. EDUCAUSE Quarterly1: 66–69.
30.
PschetzL.YataniK.EdgeD. (2014) TurningPoint: Narrative-driven presentation planning. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI’14: 7–10. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557389.
31.
ReidP. (2014) Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies19(2): 383–407. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9222-z.
32.
ReynoldsG. (2008) Presentation Zen: Simple ideas on presentation design and delivery, Upper Saddle River, NJ: New Riders Press (Pearson Imprint).
33.
SambrookS.RowleyJ. (2010) What’s the use of webnotes? Student and staff perceptions. Journal of Further and Higher Education34(1): 119–134. doi:10.1080/03098770903480338.
34.
ShainI.ThompsonA. (2007) Analysis of predictive factors that influence faculty members’ technology adoption level. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education15(2): 167–190.
35.
Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research.
36.
SusskindJ. E. (2008) Limits of PowerPoint’s power: Enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior. Computers & Education50(4): 1228–1239. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.001.
37.
ThielschM. T.PeraboI. (2012) Use and evaluation of presentation software. Technical Communication59(2): 112–123.
38.
VyasP.SharmaS. (2014) A study on the efficacy of PowerPoint for writing instruction. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning11(8): 29–42.
