Pregaming places college students at a higher risk for experiencing alcohol related negative consequences likely through less use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies. This study compared college students who did and did not endorse pregaming behaviors on their use of specific alcohol protective behavioral strategies. Participants were 331 traditional-age college students (Mage = 19.86, 64.8% White, 85.2% Female, 76.1% pregamed in past year) who completed measures assessing alcohol use, alcohol related negative consequences, pregaming, and alcohol protective behavioral strategies. Analysis of variance results showed college students who pregamed used fewer strategies aimed at modifying how one drinks, perhaps due to their potential for limiting pregaming behaviors (i.e., drinking heavily and quickly). Future research and clinical implications are discussed.
BachrachR. L.MerrillJ. E.BytschkowK. M.ReadJ. P. (2012). Development and initial validation of a measure of motives for pregaming in college students. Addictive Behaviors, 37(9), 1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.04.013
2.
BorsariB.BoyleK. E.HustadJ. T.BarnettN. P.O'Leary TevyawT.KahlerC. W. (2007). Drinking before drinking: Pregaming and drinking games in mandated students. Addictive Behaviors, 32(11), 2694–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.003
3.
CalhounB. H.MaggsJ. L. (2022). Pregame heavy episodic drinking and its association with negative consequences and other risky substance use behaviors. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 83(6), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.20-00481
4.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Planning and implementing screening and brief intervention for risky alcohol use: A step by step guide for primary care practices. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
5.
ChaneyB. H.MartinR. J.BarryA. E.LeeJ. G. L.Cremeens-MatthewsJ.StellefsonM. L. (2019). Pregaming: A field-based investigation of alcohol quantities consumed prior to visiting a bar and restaurant district. Substance Use & Misuse, 54(6), 1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2018.1558252
6.
CoxM. J.DiBelloA. M.JonesE. P.GetteJ.GodboleA.BarcenasL.RoudebushM.SimenskyJ.ManciniL.GheewallaA.PannuK. (2024). A systematic review of the associations between protective behavioral strategies and heavy alcohol consumption and consequences among young adults. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 38(4), 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001002
7.
HorváthZ.FoleyK.UrbánR. (2021). Is there a higher-order factor of alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies? Further analysis of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale’s (PBSS) factor structure. Addiction Research & Theory, 29(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2020.1762866
8.
IBM Corp. Released (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0.
9.
KahlerC. W.StrongD. R.ReadJ. P. (2005). Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(7), 1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.alc.0000171940.95813.a5
10.
Linden-CarmichaelA. N.CalhounB. H.PatrickM. E.MaggsJ. L. (2019). University students use fewer protective behavioural strategies on high-intensity drinking days. Drug and Alcohol Review, 38(3), 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12913
11.
MadsonM. B.SchuttsJ. W.JordanH. R.Villarosa-HurlockerM. C.WhitleyR. B.MohnR. S. (2020). Identifying at-risk college student drinkers with the AUDIT-US: A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Assessment, 27(6), 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118792091
12.
MadsonM. B.Zeigler-HillV. (2013). Protective behavioral strategies, alcohol consumption, and negative alcohol-related consequences: Do race and gender moderate these associations?Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 12(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2013.798848
13.
MartensM. P.FerrierA. G.SheehyM. J.CorbettK.AndersonD. A.SimmonsA. (2005). Development of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(5), 698–705. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.698
14.
MartensM. P.PedersenE. R.LaBrieJ. W.FerrierA. G.CiminiM. D. (2007). Measuring alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies among college students: Further examination of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(3), 307–315. https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1037/0893-164X.21.3.307
15.
MerrillJ. E.VermontL. N.BachrachR. L.ReadJ. P. (2013). Is the pregame to blame? Event-level associations between pregaming and alcohol-related consequences. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74(5), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2013.74.757
16.
PedersenE. R. (2016). Using the solid research base on pregaming to begin intervention development: An epilogue to the special issue on pregaming. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(8), 1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1187533
17.
PedersenE. R.DavisJ. P.HummerJ. F.DiGuiseppiG.SedanoA.RodriguezA.ClappJ. D. (2020). Development of a measure to assess protective behavioral strategies for pregaming among young adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 55(4), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1686025
18.
PedersenE. R.LaBrieJ. (2007). Partying before the party: Examining prepartying behavior among college students. Journal of American College Health, 56(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.56.3.237-246
19.
PetersonR.KramerM. P.PintoD.De LeonA. N.LearyA. V.MarinA. A.CoraJ. L.DvorakR. D. (2021). A comprehensive review of measures of protective behavioral strategies across various risk factors and associated PBS-related interventions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(3), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000498
20.
ReadJ. P.MerrillJ. E.BytschkowK. (2010). Before the party starts: Risk factors and reasons for “pregaming” in college students. Journal of American College Health, 58(5), 461–472. https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1080/07448480903540523
21.
SaundersJ. B.AaslandO. G.BaborT. F.de la FuenteJ. R.GrantM. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption–II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x
22.
SchwebelF. J.RichardsD. K.PearsonM. R., & Protective Strategies Study Team (2021). A test of interaction effects between alcohol protective behavioral strategies and antecedents of alcohol-related consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 114, 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106707
23.
TreloarH.MartensM. P.McCarthyD. M. (2015). The Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale-20: Improved content validity of the Serious Harm Reduction subscale. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000071
24.
ZamboangaB. L.MerrillJ. E.NewinsA. R.OlthuisJ. V.Van HedgerK.BlumenthalH.KimS. Y.GrigsbyT. J.PerrotteJ. K.LuiP. P.McChargueD. (2023). A national study on pregaming motives, frequency, consumption, and negative alcohol consequences among university students in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 250, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110839
25.
ZamboangaB. L.NewinsA. R.Van HedgerK.Walukevich-DienstK.HeimD.HamL. S.MonkR. L.PerrotteJ. K.DuryeaP. R.KimS. Y.LuiP. P.McChargueD.McClainP. (2025). “Drink like a man!” masculine drinking norms, alcohol protective behavioral strategies, and severity of hazardous alcohol use among college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 72(5), 627–636. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/cou0000810
