Since April 1st, 2024, recreational cannabis has been legalized in Germany. Following the legalization, an increase in cannabis consumption appeared likely; however, data supporting this statement is missing. Therefore, the current study examines changes in cannabis consumption after the legalization and investigates antecedents of cannabis use intention and behavior. Data from 605 adults were collected one month after the legalization (Time 1) and six months later (Time 2). Shortly after the cannabis legalization, attitude, subjective norm, intention, and perceived behavior control seem to be closely related to cannabis consumption. Although the data did not indicate increased cannabis consumption after the legalization, prevention programs—especially for vulnerable groups (e.g., adolescents)—should be implemented and focus on changing attitudes and perceived behavior control.
ArmitageC. J.ArdenM. A. (2007). Felt and potential ambivalence across the stages of change. Journal of Health Psychology, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105307071749
3.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
4.
BowlingN. A.HuangJ. L.BraggC. B.KhazonS.LiuM.BlackmoreC. E. (2016). Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000085
5.
ChanO.DaudiA.JiD.WangM.SteenJ. P.ParnianP.LiC.XiongA.ZhangW.LopesL. C.MacKillopJ.BusseJ. W.WangL. (2024). Cannabis use during adolescence and young adulthood and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 178(12), 1280–1289. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3674
6.
CookeR.SheeranP. (2004). Moderation of cognition-intention and cognition-behaviour relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501688
7.
CuttlerC.SpradlinA. (2017). Measuring cannabis consumption: Psychometric properties of the daily sessions, frequency, age of onset, and quantity of Cannabis use inventory (DFAQ-CU). PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0178194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178194
8.
FarrellyK. N.WardellJ. D.MarsdenE.ScarfeM. L.NajdzionekP.TurnaJ.MacKillopJ. (2023). The impact of recreational Cannabis legalization on Cannabis use and associated outcomes: A systematic review. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 17, 11782218231172054. https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231172054
9.
FrancisJ.EcclesM. P.JohnstonM.WalkerA. E.GrimshawJ. M.FoyR.KanerE. F. S.SmithL.BonettiD. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
10.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
11.
GhvanidzeS.ŠčasnýM.KangS. K.HanfJ. H. (2025). Exploring motivations for Cannabis use in casual leisure: A German perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 8(2), 149–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-024-00173-1
12.
HohmanZ. P.CranoW. D.SiegelJ. T.AlvaroE. M. (2014). Attitude ambivalence, friend norms, and adolescent drug use. Prevention Science, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0368-8
13.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032590
14.
LeungJ.ChanG. C. K.HidesL.HallW. D. (2020). What is the prevalence and risk of cannabis use disorders among people who use cannabis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 109, 106479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106479
15.
OrthB.MerkelC. (2022). Der Substanzkonsum Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener in Deutschland. Ergebnisse des Alkoholsurveys 2021 zu Alkohol, Rauchen, Cannabis und Trends. BZgA-Forschungsbericht. 1–70. https://doi.org/10.17623/BZGA:Q3-ALKSY21-DE-1.0
16.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.431
17.
ProchaskaJ. O.VelicerW. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
18.
RafeiP.EnglundA.LorenzettiV.ElkholyH.PotenzaM. N.BaldacchinoA. M. (2023). Transcultural aspects of Cannabis use: A descriptive overview of Cannabis use across cultures. Current Addiction Reports, 10(3), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00500-8
19.
RauschertC.MöcklJ.SeitzN.-N.WilmsN.OlderbakS.KrausL. (2022). The use of psychoactive substances in Germany. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 119(31–32), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0244
20.
R Core Team. (2025). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [Computer software]. R foundation for statistical Computing. https://www.R-project. org/
21.
SteinmetzH.KnappsteinM.AjzenI.SchmidtP.KabstR. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior?Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 224(3), 216–233.https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255.
22.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM.GriffinD. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences.
23.
van HarreveldF.NohlenH. U.SchneiderI. K. (2015). Chapter five – the ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 285–324). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002
24.
World Health Organization. (2018). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. World Health Organization.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
