While there is mounting support for the efficacy of alcohol-based curriculum infusion (CI) programs, studies have yielded mixed results. Insufficient attention has been given to nuances in the types of CI. Using a two-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design, this study assessed two forms of CI, information-only (IO) and service learning (SL), on drinking perceptions, drinking behavior, and protective behaviors. When the entire sample was considered, CI significantly improved participants' drinking perceptions and behavior. SL was more effective than IO for one measure of drinking behavior and for protective behaviors. Interestingly, there was a greater decrease in men's drinking behavior and increase in women's protective behaviors in the SL group. This study may help guide health professionals, educators, and faculty members interested in developing alcohol-focused CI programs.
BanerjeeM.HausafusC. O. (2007) Faculty use of service-learning: Perceptions, motivations, and impediments for the human sciences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning14(1): 32–45.
2.
BentonS. L.SchmidtJ. L.NewtonF. B.ShinK.BentonS. A.NewtonD. W. (2004) College student protective strategies and drinking consequences. Journal of Studies on Alcohol65(1): 115–121.
3.
BerkowitzA. D. (2005) An overview of the social norms approach. In: LedermanL. C.StewartL. P. (eds) Changing the culture of college drinking: A socially situated health communication campaign, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 193–214.
4.
BurchellK.RettieR.PatelK. (2013) Marketing social norms: social marketing and the ‘social norm approach’. Journal of Consumer Behaviour12(1): 1–9.
5.
CapraroR. L. (2000) Why college men drink: Alcohol, adventure, and the paradox of masculinity. Journal of American College Health48(6): 307–315.
6.
CiminiM. D.PageJ. C.TrujilloD. (2002) Using peer theater to deliver social norms information: The middle earth players program. Report on Social Norms8: 2.
7.
CorderoE. D.IsraelT.WhiteS.ParkY. S. (2010) Impact of instructor and course characteristics on the effectiveness of curriculum infusion. Journal of American College Health59(2): 75–81.
8.
DeJongW.SchneiderS. K.TowvimL. G.MurphyM. J.DoerrE. E.SimonsenN. R.ScribnerR. A. (2006) A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol67(6): 868–879.
9.
DelvaJ.SmithM. P.HowellR. L.HarrisonD. F.WilkeD.JacksonD. L. (2004) A study of the relationship between protective behaviors and drinking consequences among undergraduate college students. Journal of American College Health53(1): 19–27.
10.
FarJ. M.MillerJ. A. (2003) The small group norms-challenging model: Social norms interventions with targeted high- risk groups. In: PerkinsH. W. (ed.) The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 21–34.
11.
FlynnM. A.CarterE. (2015) Curriculum infusion of the social norms approach: Information only vs. service learning. Communication Education65(3): 322–337.
12.
GordonR.McDermottL.SteadM.AngusK. (2006) The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: What's the evidence?. Public Health120(12): 1133–1139.
13.
IBM Corp (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for Mac (Version 24.0) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
14.
JennisonK. M. (2004) The short-term effects and unintended long-term consequences of binge drinking in college: A 10-year follow-up study. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse30(3): 659–684.
15.
LapinskiM. K.RimalR. N. (2005) An explication of social norms. Communication Theory15(2): 127–147.
16.
LedermanL. C.StewartL. P.RussT. L. (2007) Addressing college drinking through curriculum infusion: A study of the use of experience-based learning in the communication classroom. Communication Education56(4): 476–494.
17.
MartensM. P.FerrierA. G.CiminiM. D. (2007) Do protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between drinking motives and alcohol use in college students?. Journal of Studies on Alcohol & Drugs68(1): 106–114.
18.
MayhewM. J.CaldwellR. J.HouriganA. (2008) The influence of curricular-based interventions with first year “success” courses on student alcohol expectancies and engagement in high-risk drinking behaviors. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice45: 49–72.
19.
McIntyreF. S.WebbD. J.HiteR. E. (2005) Service learning in the marketing curriculum: Faculty views and participation. Marketing Education Review15(1): 35–45.
20.
MunterJ. (2002) Linking community and classroom in higher education: Service-learning and student empowerment. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing10(2): 151–164.
21.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2007). What colleges need to know now: An update on college drinking. Retrieved from: https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/.
22.
NeighborsC.WalkerD. D.LarimerM. E. (2003) Expectancies and evaluations of alcohol effects among college students: Self-determination as a moderator. Journal of Studies on Alcohol64(2): 292–300.
23.
NovakJ. M.MarkeyV.AllenM. (2007) Evaluating cognitive outcomes of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports24(2): 149–157.
24.
ParkC. L.LevensonM. R. (2002) Drinking to cope among college students: Prevalence, problems and coping processes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol63(4): 486–497.
25.
PeraltaR. L. (2007) College alcohol use and the embodiment of hegemonic masculinity among European American men. Sex Roles56(11–12): 741–756.
26.
PerkinsH. (2003) The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
PerkinsH. W. (2002) Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. Suppl. 14, 164–172.
28.
PerkinsH. W.BerkowitzA. D. (1986) Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions21: 961–976.
29.
PerkinsH. W.HainesM. P.RiceR. (2005) Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: A nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol66(4): 470–478.
30.
ThombsD. L.HamiltonM. J. (2002) Effects of a social norms feedback campaign on the drinking norms and behavior of Division I student-athletes. Journal of Drug Education32: 227–244.
31.
TurnerJ.PerkinsH. W.BauerleJ. (2008) Declining negative consequences related to alcohol misuse among students exposed to a social norms marketing intervention on a college campus. Journal of American College Health57(1): 85–94.
32.
WalterK. O.PauloJ. R.PolacekG. N. (2013) Faculty perceptions of their roles in alcohol education/prevention. Journal of Drug Education43(2): 173–182.
33.
WechslerH.NelsonT. F. (2008) What we have learned from the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study: Focusing attention on college student alcohol consumption and the environmental conditions that promote it. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs69(4): 481–490.
34.
WhiteS.ParkY. S.CorderoE. D. (2010) Impact of curriculum infusion on college students' drinking behaviors. Journal of American College Health58(6): 515–522.
35.
YanovitzkyI.StewartL. P.LedermanL. C. (2006) Social distance, perceived drinking by peers, and alcohol use by college students. Health Communication19(1): 1–10.
