The current study identified psychosocial variables associated with AUDIT-C hazardous drinking risk status for male and female college students. Logistic regression analysis revealed that AUDIT-C risk status was associated with alcohol-related negative consequences, injunctive norms, and descriptive norms for both male and female participants. Sociability and self-perception outcome expectancies predicted risk status for females. Cognitive and behavioral impairment expectancies predicted risk status for men in the sample. Implications for screening and brief intervention programming efforts are discussed.
AbarC.AbarB.TurrisiR. (2009) The impact of parental modeling and permissibility on alcohol use and experienced negative drinking consequences in college. Addictive Behaviors34: 542–547. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.03.019.
2.
AgrawalA.LynskeyM. T. (2008) Are there genetic influences on addiction: Evidence from family, adoption and twin studies. Addiction103: 1069–1081. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02213.x.
3.
BaerJ. S. (1994) Effects of college residence on perceived norms for alcohol consumption: An examination of the first year in college. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors8: 43–50.
4.
BanduraA. (1999) A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Psychological Science10: 214–217. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00138.
5.
BarryA. E.ChaneyB. H.StellefsonM. L.DoddV. (2015) Evaluating the psychometric properties of the AUDIT-C among college students. Journal of Substance Use20: 1–5. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2013.856479.
6.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2003) Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol64: 331–341.
7.
BushK.KivlahanD. R.McDonellM. B.FihnS. D.BradleyK. A. (1998) The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Archives of Internal Medicine158: 1789–1795.
8.
CareyK. B.Scott-SheldonL. A. J.CareyM. P.DeMartiniK. S. (2007) Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addictive Behaviors32: 2469–2494. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.004.
9.
ClevelandM. J.LanzaS. T.RayA. E.TurrisiR.MallettK. A. (2012) Transitions in first-year college student drinking behaviors: Does pre-college drinking moderate the effects of parent- and peer-based intervention components?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors26: 440–450.
10.
Core Institute (2014) Statistics on alcohol and other drug use on American campuses, Carbondale, IL: AuthorRetrieved from http://core.siu.edu/results/index.html.
11.
CronceJ. M.LarimerM. E. (2011) Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking. Alcohol Research & Health34: 210–221.
12.
DawsonD. A.GoldsteinR. B.ChouS. P.RuanW. J.GrantB. F. (2008) Age at first drink and the first incidence of adult-onset DSM-IV alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research32: 2149–2160.
13.
DeMartiniK. S.CareyK. B. (2009) Correlates of AUDIT risk status for male and female college students. Journal of American College Health58: 233–239. doi: 10.1080/07448480903295342.
14.
DeMartiniK. S.CareyK. B. (2012) Optimizing the use of the AUDIT for alcohol screening in college students. Psychological Assessment24: 954–963. doi: 10.1037/a0028519.
15.
DeneringL. L.SpearS. E. (2012) Routine use of screening and brief intervention for college students in a university counseling center. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs44: 318–324. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2012.718647.
16.
DiFulvio, G. T., Linowski, S. A., Mazziotti, J. S., & Puleo, E. (2012). Effectiveness of the brief alcohol and screening intervention for college students (BASICS) program with a mandated population. Journal of American College Health, 60, 269–280. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.599352.
17.
ElliottJ. C.CareyK. B.BonafideK. E. (2012) Does family history of alcohol problems influence college and university drinking or substance use? A meta-analytical review. Addiction107: 1774–1785. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03903.x.
18.
FrommeK.StrootE. A.KaplanD. (1993) Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire. Psychological Assessment5: 19–26. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.1.19.
19.
Hagman, B. T. (2014). Toward efficient screening for DSM-5 alcohol use disorders in college students: Performance of the AUDIT-C. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment. doi: 10.1097/ADT.0000000000000038.
20.
HamL. S.HopeD. A. (2003) College students and problematic drinking: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review23: 719–759.
21.
HingsonR. W.ZhaW.WeitzmanE. R. (2009) Age of drinking onset, alcohol use disorders, frequent heavy drinking, and unintentionally injuring oneself and others after drinking. Pediatrics123: 1477–1484. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2176.
22.
JonesB. T.YoungR. M. (2011) Changing alcohol expectancies and self-efficacy expectations. In: CoxW. M.KlingerE. (eds) Handbook of motivational counseling, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 489–504.
23.
KahlerC. W.StrongD. R.ReadJ. P. (2005) Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research29: 1180–1189. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000171940.95813.A5.
24.
KatzE. C.FrommeK.D’AmicoE. J. (2000) Effects of outcome expectancies and personality on young adults’ illicit drug use, heavy drinking, and risky sexual behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research24: 1–22. doi: 10.1023/A:1005460107337.
25.
LabbeA. K.MaistoS. A. (2011) Alcohol expectancy challenges for college students: A narrative review. Clinical Psychology Review31: 673–683. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.007.
26.
LaBrieJ. W.FeresN.KenneyS. R.LacA. (2009) Family history of alcohol abuse moderates effectiveness of a group motivational enhancement intervention in college women. Addictive Behaviors34: 415–420. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.12.006.
27.
LarimerM. E.CronceJ. M. (2007) Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: Individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999–2006. Addictive Behaviors32: 2439–2468. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.006.
28.
LenkK. M.EricksonD. J.WintersK. C.NelsonT. F.ToomeyT. L. (2012) Screening services for alcohol misuse and abuse at four-year colleges in the US. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment43: 352–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.01.001.
29.
LewisM. A.NeighborsC. (2007) Optimizing personalized normative feedback: The use of gender-specific referents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs68: 228–237.
30.
LewisT. F.ClemensE. (2008) The influence of social norms on college student alcohol and marijuana use. Journal of College Counseling11: 19–31.
31.
MallettK. A.Varvil-WeldL.BorsariB.ReadJ. P.NeighborsC.WhiteH. R. (2013) An update of research examining college student alcohol-related consequences: New perspectives and implications for interventions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research37: 709–716. doi: 10.1111/acer.12031.
32.
MartensM. P.CiminiM. D.BarrA. R.RiveroE. M.VellisP. A.DesemoneG. A.HornerK. J. (2007) Implementing a screening and brief intervention for high-risk drinking in university-based health and mental health care settings: Reductions in alcohol use and correlates of success. Addictive Behaviors32: 2563–2572. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.005.
33.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2013) Motivational interviewing: Helping people change, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
MonkR. L.HeimD. (2013) A critical systematic review of alcohol-related outcome expectancies. Substance Use & Misuse48: 539–557. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.787097.
35.
MontiP. M.TevyawT. O.BorsariB. (2004) Drinking among young adults: Screening, brief intervention, and outcome. Alcohol Research & Health28: 236–244.
NeighborsC.LeeC. M.LewisM. A.FossosN.LarimerM. E. (2007) Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs68: 556–565.
38.
NeighborsC.O’ConnorR. M.LewisM. A.ChawlaN.LeeC. M.FossosN. (2008) The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: The role of reference group. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors22: 576–581. doi: 10.1037/a0013043.
39.
Nolen-HoeksemaS.HiltL. (2006) Possible contributors to the gender differences in alcohol use and problems. The Journal of General Psychology133: 357–374.
40.
PalmerR. S.CorbinW. R.CronceJ. M. (2010) Protective strategies: A mediator of risk associated with age of drinking onset. Addictive Behaviors35: 486–491. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.028.
41.
ParkC. L.GrantC. (2005) Determinants of positive and negative consequences of alcohol consumption in college students: Alcohol use, gender, and psychological characteristics. Addictive Behaviors30: 755–765. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.08.021.
42.
Prince, M. A., & Carey, K. B. (2010). The malleability of injunctive norms among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 940–947. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.06.006.
43.
ReadJ. P.WoodM. D.LejuezC. W.PalfaiT. P.SlackM. (2004) Gender, alcohol consumption, and differing alcohol expectancy dimensions in college drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology12: 298–308. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.12.4.298.
44.
ReinertD. F.AllenJ. P. (2007) The alcohol use disorders identification test: An update of research findings. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research31: 185–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x.
45.
Scott-SheldonL. A. J.CareyK. B.ElliottJ. C.GareyL.CareyM. P. (2014) Efficacy of alcohol interventions for first-year college students: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology82: 177–188.
46.
Scott-SheldonL. J.TerryD. L.CareyK. B.GareyL.CareyM. P. (2012) Efficacy of expectancy challenge interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors26: 393–405. doi: 10.1037/a0027565.
47.
SmithD. C.CleelandL.MiddletonA.GodleyM. D. (2013) Willingness and appropriateness of peers participating in emerging adults’ substance misuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment45(1): 148–154.
48.
SugarmanD. E.DeMartiniK. S.CareyK. B. (2009) Are women at greater risk? An examination of alcohol-related consequences and gender. The American Journal on Addictions18: 194–197. doi: 10.1080/10550490902786991.
49.
TevyawT. O.BorsariB.ColbyS. M.MontiP. M. (2007) Peer enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors21: 114–119. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.1.114.
50.
ThombsD. L.O’MaraR.ToblerA. L.WagenaarA. C.ClappJ. D. (2009) Relationships between drinking onset, alcohol use intensity, and nighttime risk behaviors in a college bar district. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse35: 421–428. doi: 10.3109/00952990903414501.
51.
WeederK. S. (2008) Binge drinking in college-aged women: Framing a gender-specific prevention strategy. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners20: 577–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00357.x.
