The state of knowledge regarding the relative influence of issues, parties, and candidates across time in presidential elections is confounded because researchers have typically employed standardized correlation coefficients. Employing unstandardized coefficients on openended presidential candidate evaluations for the 1952 to 1984 elections, this article examines the manner and extent to which the relationship between issues, party, candidates, and the vote have fluctuated over time. The results suggest, as have others, that party influence on the vote has declined. However, no evidence is found to support the assertion of an increase in issue influence on the vote decision. Candidate influence on the vote is found to be stable over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALDRICH, J. H.
and F. D. NELSON (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models.Beverly Hills; Sage
2.
BLALOCK, H. M., Jr.
(1967) “Path coefficients versus regression coefficients.”American J. of Sociology72: 675-676.
3.
CAMPBELL, A.
, P. E. CONVERSE, W. E. MILLER, and D. E. STOKES (1960). The American Voter.New York: Wiley
4.
CAMPBELL, A.
, P. E. CONVERSE, W. E. MILLER, and D. E. STOKES (1968). The 1956 Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Survey Research Center
5.
CAMPBELL, A.
, P. E. CONVERSE, W. E. MILLER, and D. E. STOKES (1970). The 1960 Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Survey Research Center
6.
CAMPBELL, A.
, G. GURIN, and W. E. MILLER (1971). The 1952 American Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Survey Research Center
7.
CROTTY, W.
(1984) American Parties in Decline.Boston: Little, Brown
8.
DUNCAN, O. D.
(1975) Introduction to Structural Equation Models.New York: Academic Press
9.
HARRIS, F. R.
(1986) America's Democracy: The Ideal and the Reality.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman
10.
HARTWIG, F.
, W. R. JENKINS, and E. M. TEMCHIN (1980). “Variability in electoral behavior: The 1960, 1968, and 1976 elections.”American J. of Pol. Sci.24: 553-558.
11.
HEISE, D. R.
(1975) Casual Analysis.New York: Wiley
12.
JACKSON, J. E.
(1975) “Issues, party choices and presidential votes.”American J. of Pol. Sci.19: 161-185.
13.
JANDA, K.
, J. M. BERRY, and J. GOLDMAN (1987). The Challenge of Democracy: Government in America.Boston: Houghton Miffin
14.
KELLY, S., Jr.
, and T. W. MIRER. (1974) “The simple act of voting.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.68: 572-591.
15.
KESSEL, J. H.
(1972) “Comment: The issues in issue voting.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.66: 459-465.
16.
KEY, V. O., Jr.
(1966) The Responsible Electorate.Cambridge; MA: Harvard Univ. Press
17.
KIM, J.-O.
and C. W. MUELLER (1976). “Standardized and unstandardized coefficients in causal analysis: an expository note.”Soc. Methods and Research4: 423-438.
18.
KINDER, D. R.
and D. O. SEARS. (1982). “Political behavior,” in E. Aronson and G. Lindsey (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
19.
MARKUS, G. B.
and P. E. CONVERSE (1979). “A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.73: 1055-1070.
20.
MILLER, A. H.
, W. E. MILLER, A. S. RAINE, and T. A. BROWN. (1976) “A majority party in disarray: Policy polarization in the 1972 election.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.70: 753-778.
21.
MILLER, W.
and A. MILLER. (1977) The CPS 1976 American National Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Center for Political Studies
22.
MILLER, W.
, A. MILLER, R. BRODY, J. DENNIS, D. KEVENOCH, and M. SHANKS (1975) The CPS 1972 American National Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Center for Political Studies
23.
MILLER, W.
and the National Election Studies (1983). American National Election Study, 1980.Univ. of Michigan: Center for Political Studies.
24.
MILLER, W.
and the National Election Studies (1986). American National Election Study, 1984.Univ. of Michigan: Center for Political Studies
25.
NIE, N. H.
, S. VERBA, and J. R. PETROCIK (1979). The Changing American Voter.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
26.
NIE, N. H.
, S. VERBA, and J. R. PETROCIK (1986). “The rise in issue voting,” in P. S. Nivola and D. H. Rosenbloom (eds.) Classic Readings in American Politics.New York: St. Martin's
27.
PAGE, B. I.
and C. JONES. (1979) “Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.73: 1071-1089.
28.
Political Behavior Program
(1971). The 1964 Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Survey Research Center
29.
Political Behavior Program
(1973). The 1968 American National Election Study.Univ. of Michigan: Survey Research Center
30.
POMPER, G. M.
(1972) “From confusion to clarity: Issues and American voters, 1956-1968.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.66: 415-428.
31.
RePASS, D. E.
(1971) “Issue salience and party choice.”American Pol. Sci. Rev.65: 389-400.
32.
SCHOENBERG, R.
(1972) “Strategies for meaningful comparison,” in H. L. Costner (ed.) Sociological Methodology.Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass
33.
SCHULMAN, M. A.
, and G. M. POMPER. (1976) “Variability in electoral behavior: Longitudinal perspectives from casual modeling,” in R. G. Niemi and H. F. Weisberg (eds) Controversies in American Voter Behavior.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman
