Investigation of dissenting opinions on the Warren and Burger courts in which all the justices in dissent joined the same dissenting opinion reveals that the justice in the extreme ideological position tends to write the dissenting opinion, but in the maximum losing coalitions the marginal justice (i.e., the justice ideologically closest to the majority) is equally likely to do so. These findings suggest that small group theory better explains dissenting opinion behavior than the theory of cognitive dissonance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BRENNER, S.
and H. J. SPAETH (1986) “Issue specialization in majority opinion assignment on the Burger Court.”Western Pol. Q.39 (September): 520-527.
2.
BRENNER, S.
and H. J. SPAETH (1988) “Majority opinion assessment and the maintenance of the original coalition on the Warren Court.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.32 (February): 72-81.
3.
GOLDMAN, S.
and T. P. JAHNIGE (1985) The Federal Courts as a Political System (3rd ed.). New York: Harper&Row.
4.
McLAUCHLAN, W. P.
(1972) “Research note: ideology and conflict in Supreme Court opinion assignment, 1946-1962.”Western Pol. Q.25 (March): 16-27.
5.
MURPHY, W. F.
(1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
6.
RATHJEN, G. J.
(1974) “An analysis of separate opinion writing behavior as dissonance reduction.”Amer. Politics Q.2 (October): 393-411.
7.
ROHDE, D. W. (1971) “Strategy and ideology: the assignment of majority opinions in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.
8.
ROHDE, D. W.
(1972) “Policy goals, strategic choice and majority opinion assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.”Midwest J. of Pol. Sci.16 (November): 652-682.
9.
ROHDE, D. W.
and H. J. SPAETH (1976) Supreme Court Decision Making.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
10.
SCHUBERT, G.
(1959) Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
11.
SLOTNICK, E. E.
(1979) “Who speaks for the Court? Majority opinion assignment from Taft to Burger.”Amer. J. of Pol. Science23 (February): 60-77.
12.
SPAETH, H. J.
(1962) “Judicial power as a variable motivating Supreme Court behavior.”Midwest J. of Pol. Sci.6 (February): 54-82.
13.
SPAETH, H. J.
(1963a) “An analysis of judicial attitudes in labor relations decisions of the Warren Court.”J. of Politics25 (May): 290-311.
14.
SPAETH, H. J.
(1936b) “Warren Court attitudes toward business: the ”B' scale,” pp. 79-108 in G. Schubert (ed.) Judicial Decision-Making.New York: Free Press.
15.
SPAETH, H. J.
and D. J. PETERSON (1971) “The analysis and interpretation of dimensionality.”Midwest J. of Pol. Sci.15 (August): 415-441.
16.
ULMER, S. S.
(1970) “The use of power in the Supreme Court: the opinion assignments of Earl Warren, 1953-1960.”J. of Public Law19 (1): 49-67.
