Evidence suggests that the modern Supreme Court reflects nationwide public opinion in nearly three-fifths of its decisions. The post-New Deal Court has been especially majoritarian in federal-level disputes and in “crisis times” cases. Overall, the modern Court appears to be as majoritarian as other American policymakers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA, SCHOOL DISTRICT V. SCHEMPP (1963) 374 U.S. 203.
2.
ABRAHAM, H.
(1980) The Judicial Process.New York: Oxford.
3.
ADAMANY, D.
(1973) “Legitimacy, realigning elections, and the Supreme Court.”1973 Wisconsin Law Rev.: 79-846.
4.
ALDRICH, J.
and F. NELSON (1984) Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
BAAS, L.
and D. THOMAS (1984) “The Supreme Court and policy legitimation: experimental tests.”Amer. Politics Q.12: 335-360.
6.
BARNUM, D.
(1985) “The Supreme Court and public opinion: judicial decision making in the post-New Deal period.”J. of Politics46: 652-666.
7.
BECK, P. A.
(1976) “Comment: critical elections and the Supreme Court: putting the cart after the house.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70: 930-932.
8.
BECKER, T.
(1970) Comparative Judicial Politics.Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
BICKEL, A.
(1978) The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress.New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
10.
BLAKE, J.
(1977) “The Supreme Court's abortion decisions and public opinion in the United States.”Population and Development Rev.3: 45-62.
11.
BRENNER, S.
(1982) “Fluidity on the Supreme Court: 1956-1967.”Am. J. of Pol. Sci.26: 388-390.
12.
CALDEIRA, G.
and D. McCRONE (1982) “Of time and judicial activism,” pp. 103-127 in S. Halpern and C. Lamb (eds.) Supreme Court Activism and Restraint.Lexington, MA: Lexington.
13.
CANON, B.
and S. ULMER (1976) “The Supreme Court and critical elections: a dissent.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70: 1215-1218.
14.
CASPER, J.
(1972) The Politics of Civil Liberties.New York: Harper&Row.
15.
CASPER, J.
(1976) “The Supreme Court and national policy making.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70: 50-63.
16.
CHOPER, J.
(1974) The Supreme Court and the Political Branches: Democratic Theory and Practice.U. Penn. Law Rev.122: 810-858.
17.
CHOPER, J.
(1980) Judicial Review and the National Political Process.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
18.
COOK, B.
(1977) “Public opinion and federal judiciary policy.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.21: 567-600.
19.
DAHL, R.
(1957) “Decision making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as a national policy maker.”J. of Public Law6: 279-295.
20.
DANIELSKI, D.
(1968) “The Influence of the chief justice in the decisional process of the Supreme Court,” pp. 147-160 in S. Goldman and T. Jahnige (eds.) The Federal Judicial System.New York: Holt, Rinehart,&Winston.
21.
DENNIS V. UNITED STATES (1951) 342 U.S. 494.
22.
DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD (1857) 60 U.S. 691.
23.
DOUGLAS, W. O.
(1949) “Stare decisis.”Columbia Law Rev.49: 735-758.
24.
ELY, J. H.
(1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
25.
ENGLE V. VITALE (1962) 370 U.S. 421.
26.
ERIKSON, R.
(1976) “The relationship between public opinion and state policy: a new look based on some forgotten data.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.20: 25-36.
27.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION V. HOPE NATURAL GAS COMPANY (1944) 320 U.S. 591.
28.
FUNSTON, R.
(1975) “The Supreme Court and critical elections.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.69: 793-811.
29.
Gallup Poll
, 1935-71 (1972) New York: Random House (1963: 1837)
30.
Gallup Poll
, 1935-71 (1972) New York: Random House (1965: 1933)
31.
Gallup Poll, 1985 (1985) Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
32.
GIBSON, J.
(1980) “Environmental constraints on the behavior of judges: a representational model of judicial decision making.”Law&Society Rev.14: 343-370.
33.
GRAEBNER, D.
(1973) “Judicial activity and public attitude: a quantitative study of selective service sentencing in the Vietnam War period.”Buffalo Law Rev.23: 465-498.
34.
GREY, T.
(1975) “Do we have an unwritten Constitution?”Stanford Law Rev.27: 703-718.
35.
HANSEN, S.
(1975) “Participation, political structures, and concurrences.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.69: 1181-1199.
36.
HANSEN, S.
(1978) “Linkage models, issues, and community politics.”Am. Politics Q.6: 3-28.
37.
HEWITT, C.
(1974) “Policy making in postwar Britain: a nation-level test of elitist and pluralist hypotheses.”British J. of Pol. Sci.4: 187-216.
38.
JACKSON, R.
(1941) The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.New York: Knopf.
39.
JACKSON, R.
(1944) “Decisional law and stare decisis.”Amer. Bar Assoc. J.30: 334-335.
40.
JAROS, D.
and R. ROPER (1980) “The U.S. Supreme Court: myth, diffuse support, specific support, and legitimacy.”Amer. Politics Q.8: 85-105.
41.
KRITZER, H.
(1978) “Political correlates of the behavior of federal district judges: a `best case' analysis.”J. of Politics40: 25-58.
42.
KUKLINSKI, J.
and J. STANGA (1979) “Political participation and government responsiveness: the behavior of California superior courts.”Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.73: 1090-1099.
43.
KURLAND, P.
(1970) Politics, the Constitution, and the Warren Court.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
44.
MACE, G.
(1972) “The antidemocratic character of judicial review.”California Law Rev.60: 1140-1149.
45.
MARSHALL, T.
(forthcoming) Public Opinion and the Supreme Court.Winchester, MA: Allen&Unwin.
46.
McCLESKY, C.
(1966) “Judicial review in a democracy: a dissenting opinion.”Houston Law Rev.3: 354-366.
47.
McCLOSKEY, R.
(1972) The Modern Supreme Court.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
48.
McKELVEY, A.
and W. ZAVOINA (1975) “A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables.”J. of Mathematical Sociology4: 103-120.
49.
MILLER, W.
and D. STOKES (1963) “Constituency influence in Congress.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.57: 45-56.
50.
MONROE, A.
(1979) “Consistency between public preferences and national policy decisions.”Amer. Politics Q.7: 3-19.
51.
MURPHY, W.
(1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy.Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
52.
O'BRIEN, D.
(1986) Storm Center.New York: Norton.
53.
OREGON V. MITCHELL (1970) 400 U.S. 112.
54.
PAGE, B.
and R. SHAPIRO (1982) “Changes in Americans' policy preferences, 1935-1979.”Public Opinion Q.46: 24-42.
55.
PAGE, B.
and R. SHAPIRO (1983) “Effects of public opinion on policy.”Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.77: 175-190.
56.
PAGE, B.
, R. SHAPIRO, and G. DEMPSEY (1987) “What moves public opinion?”Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.81: 23-44.
57.
SCHUBERT, G.
(1965) The Judicial Mind.Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
58.
SHAPIRO, M.
(1979) “The Supreme Court from Warren to Burger,” pp. 179-211 in A. King (ed.) The New American Political System.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
59.
SHELDON, C.
(1967) “Public opinion and high courts Communist party cases in four constitutional systems.”Western Pol. Q.15: 341-360.
60.
SOUTH CAROLINA V. KATZENBACH (1966) 383 U.S. 301, 335-337.
61.
SNYDER, E. (1956) “A quantitative analysis of Supreme Court opinions from 1921-1953.” Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
62.
SNYDER, E.
(1958) “The Supreme Court as a small group.”Social Forces36: 232-238.
63.
SPAETH, H.
and S. TEGER (1982) “Activism and restraint: a cloak for the justices' policy preferences,” pp. 277-301 in S. Halpern and C. Lamb (eds.) Supreme Court Activism and Restraint.Lexington, MA: Lexington.
64.
SUTTON, R.
(1973) “The states and the people: measuring and accounting for `state representativeness.”Polity5: 451-76.
65.
ULMER, S.
(1978) “Selecting cases for Supreme Court review: an underdog model.”Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.72: 902-909.
66.
UNITED STATES V. CAROLENE PRODUCTS COMPANY (1938) 304 U.S. 144.
67.
USLANER, E.
and R. WEBER (1980) “Public Support for pro-choice abortion policies in the nation and states: changes and stability after the Roe and Doe decisions,” pp. 206-223 in C. Schneider and M. Vinovskis (eds.) The Law and Politics of Abortion.Lexington, MA: Lexington.
68.
WASBY, S.
(1984) The Supreme Court in the Federal Judicial System.New York: Holt, Rinehart&Winston.
69.
WECHSLER, H.
(1959) “Toward neutral principles of constitutional law.”Harvard Law Rev.73: 1-35.
70.
WEISSBERG, R.
(1976) Public Opinion and Popular Government.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
71.
WEST COAST HOTEL COMPANY V. PARRISH (1937) 300 U.S. 379.
