This study examines the personal perceptions and aspirations of 187 students studying at two universities in Syracuse, New York during the spring of 1992. The Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale is used to determine the best and worst possible outcomes for themselves, the United States, and Europe. The evaluations and responses of full- and part-time students attending a private university are compared with those enrolled at a public university. Research results indicate that, although students are most optimistic about their own future and to a lesser extent the future of Europe, they are more pessimistic about the future prospects for the United States. Students' hopes, fears, and ladder ratings are described and compared, and the findings are interpreted from a cognitive dissonance perspective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astin, A. W. , Green, K. C., & Korn, W. S. (1987). The American freshman: Twenty year trends. Los Angeles: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute.
2.
Braungart, R. G. , & Braungart, M. M. (1988). From yippies to yuppies: Twenty years of freshmen attitudes. Public Opinion, 11, 53-56.
3.
Braungart, R. G. , & Braungart, M. M. (1989). Black colleges: Freshman attitudes. Public Opinion, 12, 12-14, 57-58.
4.
Braungart, R. G. , & Braungart, M. M. (1990). Youth movements in the 1980s: A global perspective. International Sociology, 5, 157-181.
5.
Braungart, R. G. , & Braungart, M. M. (1992). Perceptions of Europe from America. International Journal of Sociology, 22, 130-152.
6.
Broder, D. S. (1980). Changing of the guard: Power and leadership in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
7.
Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
Coleman, J. S. (1974). Youth: Transition to adulthood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Coupland, D. (1991). Generation X. New York: St. Martin's.
10.
Creighton, J. A. , & Harwood, R. C. (1993). College students talk politics. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
11.
Dannefer, D. (1984). Adult development and social theory: A paradigmatic reappraisal. American Sociological Review, 49, 100-116.
12.
Dey, E. L. , Astin, A. W., Korn, W. S., & Riggs, E. R. (1992). The American freshman: National norms for fall 1992. Los Angeles: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute.
13.
DiTomaso, N. (1990). The managed state: Governmental reorganization in the first year of the Reagan administration. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), The political sociology of the state (pp. 141-166). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
14.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1956). From generation to generation: Age groups and social structure. New York: Free Press.
15.
Elder, G. H., Jr. , Modell, J., & Parke, R. D. (Eds.). (1993). Children in time and place: Developmental and historical insights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Elkind, D. (1984). All grown up and no place to go: Teenagers in crisis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Erikson, E. H. (Ed.). (1963). Youth: Change and challenge. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
19.
Featherman, D. L. , & Lerner, R. M. (1985). Ontogenesis and sociogenesis problematics for theory and research about development and socialization across the lifespan. American Sociological Review, 50, 659-676.
20.
Feuer, L. S. (1969). The conflict of generations. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Fineman, H. (1992, November/December). The torch passes. Newsweek: Special election issue, 4-10.
22.
Hart, P.D. (1989). Democracy's next generation. Washington, DC: People for the American Way.
23.
Hartle, T. W. (1987). Education reform: We have a lot to learn. Public Opinion, 10, 48-51.
24.
Hixon, W. B., Jr. (1992). Search for the American right wing: An analysis of the social science record, 1955-1987. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Howe, N. , & Strauss, B. (1993). 13th Gen: Abort, retry, ignore, fail?New York: Vintage.
26.
Keniston, K. (1971). Youth and dissent. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27.
Klein, H. (1990). Adolescence, youth, and young adulthood: Rethinking current conceptualizations of life stage. Youth & Society, 21, 446-471.
28.
Lasch, C. (1978). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: Norton.
29.
Levinson, D. J. , Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). Seasons of a man's life. New York: Ballantine.
30.
Lighty, T. (1992, November 12). SU voters go right to top. Syracuse Post Standard, p. B1.
31.
Lundestad, G. (1986). East, West, North, South: Major developments in international politics 1945-1986. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
32.
Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33.
McWilliams, W. C. , & Piotrowski, H. (1988). The world since 1945. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
34.
Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press/Doubleday.
35.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Parsons, T. (1963). Youth in the context of American society. In E. Erikson (Ed.), Youth: Change and challenge (pp. 93-119). New York: Basic Books.
37.
Phillips, K. (1993). Boiling point. New York: Random House.
38.
Rothman, S. , & Lichter, S. R. (1982). Roots of radicalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Schlesinger, A. M., Jr. (1986). The cycles of American history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
Snyder, T. D. , & Fromboluti, C. S. (1993). Youth indicators 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
Strauss, W. , & Howe, N. (1991). Generations. New York: William Morrow.
42.
Szabo, S. F. (1983). The successor generation. Woburn, MA: Butterworths.
43.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1992). Statistical abstracts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44.
Vander Zanden, J. W. (1993). Human development. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
