Drawing on Schwartz’s value theory and self-determination theory, this study addressed how South Korean adolescents organize competing life priorities within their sociocultural context. Using a nationally representative sample (N = 7,540), this study examined heterogeneity in value orientations across 11 life domains. Latent profile analysis identified three groups: an intrinsic stability-oriented group emphasizing family and personal stability values, a low-value group with diffuse commitments, and an integrative high-value group showing broadly elevated value endorsement. Multinomial logistic regression showed that positive family relationships were associated with both intrinsic stability-oriented and integrative profiles. Challenge-oriented attitudes and lower materialism distinguished the stability-oriented group, whereas higher subjective happiness and stronger internal future control characterized the integrative group. A nonlinear school-level pattern emerged, with middle school students (grades 7–9) showing greater likelihood of diffuse orientations rather than integrated value patterns. These findings highlight how sociocultural pressures and developmental contexts can shape adolescents’ value orientations.
Abdel-KhalekA. M. (2006). Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139
2.
BaekE. J.ParkJ.-S.HeoN. S. (2023). Life value profiles and influencing factors: A latent profile analysis in Korean Generation Z adolescents. Journal of Future Oriented Youth Society, 20(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.34244/JFOYS.2023.20.1.3
3.
BergmanL. R.TrostK. (2006). The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds?Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 601–632. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/mpq/vol52/iss3/10
4.
BerlinK. S.WilliamsN. A.ParraG. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling: Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084
5.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2809–2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4
6.
DanielE.Benish-WeismanM. (2019). Value development during adolescence: Dimensions of change and stability. Journal of Personality, 87(3), 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12420
7.
DanielE.Benish-WeismanM.SneddonJ. N.LeeJ. A. (2020). Value profiles during middle childhood: Developmental processes and social behavior. Child Development, 91(5), e1615–e1630. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13362
8.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
9.
GilletN.VallerandR. J.LafrenièreM. A. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9170-2
10.
GrouzetF. M. E.KasserT.AhuviaA.DolsJ. M. F.KimY.LauS.RyanR. M.SaundersS.SchmuckP.SheldonK. M. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 800–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.800
HaerpferC.InglehartR.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Díez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB. (Eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round seven—Country-pooled datafile (Version 6.0.0). JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.24
13.
HanN.LeeS. (2023). A comparative study of value priorities between South Korean and Canadian university students. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 37(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2023.37.3.007
ImH.BaekH.KimH.KangH. (2012). 2012 International comparative study on youth values (Research Report 2012-22). National Youth Policy Institute.
16.
ImH.HwangY. (2023). A study on Korean adolescents’ values in 2023 (Research Report 23-gibon-04). National Youth Policy Institute.
17.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
18.
KasserT. (2002). The high price of materialism. MIT Press.
19.
KasserT.RyanR. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006
20.
KimK. J.LeeY. S. (2024). Stability and change of personal value in South Korean adolescents: The effect of social networks. Cross-Cultural Research, 59(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971241234106
21.
KimY.NamgungJ.ParkK.ChoiI.KimM.KangH. (2016). Korean Education Longitudinal Study 2013 (IV): Educational experiences and achievements of middle school students (I) (Research Report RR2016-16-01). Korean Educational Development Institute.
22.
KimH.ProutyA. M.SmithD. B.KoM. J.WetchlerJ. L.OhJ. E. (2015). Differentiation and healthy family functioning of Koreans in South Korea, South Koreans in the United States, and White Americans. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12049
23.
Knafo-NoamA.DanielE.Benish-WeismanM. (2024). The development of values in middle childhood: Five maturation criteria. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(3), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231205865
24.
KooJ.SuhE. (2015). A structural analysis of adolescents’ intrinsic value orientation, basic psychological need satisfaction, and subjective well-being. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 22(10), 317–338.
25.
La GuardiaJ. G. (2009). Developing who I am: A self-determination theory approach to the establishment of healthy identities. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832350
26.
LaursenB.HoffE. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0029
27.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
28.
MannerströmR.HietajärviL.KuusistoA.Salmela-AroK.KallioniemiA. (2023). Value profiles among Finnish adolescents and their associations with subjective and social well-being. Child Indicators Research, 16(2), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09992-8
29.
MarciaJ. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
30.
MasynK. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In LittleT. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology: Statistical analysis (Vol. 2., pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.
31.
MorganG. B. (2015). Mixed mode latent class analysis: An examination of fit index performance for classification. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.935751
32.
National Assembly Futures Institute. (2020). Survey on future values of Koreans (Version 1.0) [Dataset]. Korean Social Science Data Archive (KOSSDA). https://doi.org/10.22687/KOSSDA-A1-2020-0063-V1.0
33.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthenB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
34.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press.
35.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
36.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
SchwartzS. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
39.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.VecchioneM.DavidovE.FischerR.BeierleinC.RamosA.VerkasaloM.LönnqvistJ.-E.DemirutkuK.Dirilen-GumusO.KontyM. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
SpurkD.HirschiA.WangM.ValeroD.KauffeldS. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
UlyaninaO.RadchikovaN. P.BorisenkoE.KhayrovaZ. (2023). Psychodiagnostics of value orientations of adolescents: The results of standardization of the methodology “Hierarchy of Life Values” by G. V. Rezapkina. Social Psychology and Society, 14(3), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140310
44.
UngvaryS.McDonaldK. L.Benish-WeismanM. (2018). Identifying and distinguishing value profiles in American and Israeli adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12330
45.
WentzelK. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202
46.
Wray-LakeL.SyvertsenA. K.FlanaganC. A. (2016). Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence: An ecological perspective. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000067
47.
WuF.JiangY.LiuD.KonorovaE.YangX. (2022). The role of perceived teacher and peer relationships in adolescent students’ academic motivation and educational outcomes. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2042488
48.
XieJ. Q.YinX. Q.QiuJ.YangJ.HuangY. Y.LiM.ChenK.XiongJ. R. (2023). Latent profile analysis of personal values among Chinese college students: Associations with mental health disorders and life satisfaction. Current Psychology, 42, 27232–27244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03861-x
