This 2-year longitudinal study examines the relations between math and science interest, STEM identity, and perceptions of STEM barriers in 280 (68% female; Mage = 15.27) adolescents in the United States and the United Kingdom. Structural equation models indicated that higher math interest at time 1 was positively associated with overall STEM identity at time 2, and greater STEM identity at time 2 was related to fewer perceptions of barriers to STEM at time 3. Surprisingly, science interest, gender-STEM identity, and racial-ethnic STEM identity were not associated with perceptions of STEM barriers. Results underscore the foundational role of math interest and STEM identity and in support of adolescents’ persistence in STEM pursuits.
AdamsJ. D.GuptaP. (2013). “I learn more here than I do in school. Honestly, I wouldn’t lie about that”: Creating a space for agency and identity around science. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 4(2), 87–104.
2.
AdamsJ. D.GuptaP.CotumaccioA. (2014). Long-term participants: A museum program enhances girls’ STEM interest, motivation, and persistence. Afterschool Matters, 20, 13–20.
3.
BlanchardM.GutierrezK.HabigB.GuptaP.AdamsJ. (2020). Informal STEM program learning. In JohnsonC. C.Morhr-SchroederM. J.MooreT. J.EnglishL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 138–151). Routledge.
4.
Byars-WinstonA.RogersJ. G. (2019). Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social–cognitive career theory model with science identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000309
5.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
6.
CollinsK. H. (2018). Confronting color-blind STEM talent development: Toward a contextual model for black student STEM identity. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x18757958
DisalvoB.GuzdialM.MeadowsC.PerryK.McklinT.BruckmanA. (2013). Workifying games [Conference session]. Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '13 http://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445292
9.
DisalvoB.YardiS.GuzdialM.McklinT.MeadowsC.PerryK.BruckmanA. (2011). African American men constructing computing identity [Conference session]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
10.
DouR.CianH. (2022). Constructing STEM identity: An expanded structural model for STEM identity research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(3), 458–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21734
11.
DouR.HazariZ.DabneyK.SonnertG.SadlerP. (2019). Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science & Education, 103(3), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21499
12.
DrazanJ. F.LoyaA. K.HorneB. D.EglashR. (2017). From sports to science: Using basketball analytics to broaden the appeal of math and science among youth [Conference session]. MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, Hynes Convention Center.
13.
Else-QuestN. M.MineoC. C.HigginsA. (2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313480694
14.
EspinoM.StevensA.RodriguezS.LeB. D. (2024). Exploring how socioeconomic status and the S-STEM scholarship influence engineering identity development for community college students. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 48(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2023.2293304
15.
FlemingK.FoodyM.MurphyC. (2020). Using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) to examine implicit gender stereotypes in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM). Psychological Record, 70(3), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00401-6
16.
FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.AliS. R. (2017). The state of SCCT research in relation to social class: Future directions. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658649
17.
FlowersA. M.BandaR. M. (2019). An investigation of black males in advanced placement math and science courses and their perceptions of identity related to STEM possibilities. Gifted Child Today, 42(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519842213
18.
FredricksJ. A.HofkensT.WangM.MortensonE.ScottP. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419
19.
GodwinA.PotvinG. (2017). Pushing and pulling Sara: A case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21372
20.
GodwinA.PotvinG.HazariZ.LockR. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118
21.
GoffE. E.MulveyK. L.IrvinM. J.Hartstone-RoseA. (2020). The effects of prior informal science and math experiences on undergraduate STEM identity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38, 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1627307
22.
GrahamM. J.FrederickJ.Byars-WinstonA.HunterA.-B.HandelsmanJ. (2013). Science education. Increasing persistence of college students in stem. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
23.
GrossmanJ. M.PorcheM. V. (2014). Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education, 49(6), 698–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913481364
24.
HarackiewiczJ. M.RozekC. S.HullemanC. S.HydeJ. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435530
25.
HazariZ.SadlerP. M.SonnertG. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.
26.
HazariZ.SonnertG.SadlerP. M.ShanahanM. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
27.
HillC.CorbettC.St RoseA. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. ERIC.
28.
HoffmanA. J.McGuireL.RutlandA.Hartstone-RoseA.IrvinM. J.WinterbottomM.BalkwillF.FieldsG. E.MulveyK. L. (2021). The relations and role of social competencies and belonging with math and science interest and efficacy for adolescents in informal STEM programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01302-1
29.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
30.
HuangX.ZhangJ.HudsonL. (2019). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: The gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
31.
HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
32.
IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 27.0) [Computer Software]. IBM Corp.
33.
IrelandD. T.FreemanK. E.Winston-ProctorC. E.DeLaineK. D.McDonald LoweS.WoodsonK. M. (2018). (Un)Hidden figures: A synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of black women and girls in STEM Education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x18759072
34.
JonesM. G.ChesnuttK.EnnesM.MulveyK. L.CaytonE. (2021). Understanding science career aspirations: Factors predicting future science task value. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21687
35.
JoyA.MathewsC. J.ZhaoM.LawF.McGuireL.HoffmanA. J.BalkwillF.BurnsK. P.ButlerL.DrewsM.FieldsG.SmithH.OzturkE.WinterbottomM.RutlandA.Hartstone-RoseA.MulveyK. L. (2023). Interest, mindsets and engagement: Longitudinal relations in science orientations for adolescents in informal science programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52, 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01734-52023
36.
KimA. Y.SinatraG. M.SeyranianV. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
37.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
38.
LaForceM.NobleE.BlackwellC. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092
39.
LentR. W.SheuH.-B.MillerM. J.CusickM. E.PennL. T.TruongN. N. (2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243
40.
LeyvaE.WalkingtonC.PereraH.BernackiM. (2022). Making mathematics relevant: An examination of student interest in mathematics, interest in STEM careers, and perceived relevance. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(3), 612–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00159-4
41.
LinP. Y.SchunnC. D. (2016). The dimensions and impact of informal science learning experiences on middle schoolers’ attitudes and abilities in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2551–2572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1251631
42.
LondonB.RosenthalL.LevyS. R.LobelM. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
43.
LondonJ. S.LeeW. C.Hawkins AshC. D. (2021). Potential engineers: A systematic literature review exploring black children's access to and experiences with STEM. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(4), 1003–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20426
44.
MaiorcaC.RobertsT.JacksonC.BushS.DelaneyA.Mohr-SchroederM. J.SoledadS. Y. (2021). Informal learning environments and impact on interest in STEM careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10038-9
45.
MaloneK. R.BarabinoG. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science & Education, 93(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20307
46.
MalteseA. V.MelkiC. S.WiebkeH. L. (2014). The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM. Science & Education, 98(6), 937–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21132
47.
MalteseA. V.TaiR. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385
48.
MalteseA. V.TaiR. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science & Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
49.
MartinA. J.WayJ.BobisJ.AndersonJ. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529365
50.
Martin-HansenL. (2018). Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM. International Journal of Stem Education, 5(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0150-3
51.
McCreedyD.DierkingL. D. (2013). Cascading influences. Franklin Institute Science Museum.
52.
McDonaldC. V. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530–569.
53.
McDonaldM. M.Zeigler-HillV.VrabelJ. K.EscobarM. (2019). A single-item measure for assessing STEM identity. Frontiers in Education, 4(78), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00078
54.
McGeeE. O. (2015). Robust and fragile mathematical identities: A framework for exploring racialized experiences and high achievement among black college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 599–625. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0599
55.
McGeeE. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216676572
56.
McGeeE. O.MartinD. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211423972
57.
McGuireL.MulveyK. L.GoffE.IrvinM. J.WinterbottomM.FieldsG. E.Hartstone-RoseA.RutlandA. (2020). STEM gender stereotypes from early childhood through adolescence at informal science centers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 67, 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101109
58.
MosatcheH. S.Matloff-NievesS.KekelisL.LawnerE. K. (2013). Effective STEM programs for adolescent girls: Three approaches and many lessons learned. Afterschool Matters, 17, 17–25.
59.
MulveyK. L.JoyA.CaslinM.OrcuttD.EseryelD.KattiM. (2023). Forests after Florence: An informal community-engaged STEM research project promotes STEM identity in disaster-impacted students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(2), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1944077
60.
MulveyK. L.McGuireL.MathewsC.HoffmanA. J.LawF.JoyA.Hartstone-RoseA.WinterbottomM.BalkwillF.FieldsG.ButlerL.BurnsK.DrewsM.RutlandA. (2022). Preparing the next generation for STEM: Adolescent profiles encompassing math and science motivation and interpersonal skills and their associations with identity and belonging. Youth & Society, 55(6), 1207–1230.
61.
MutegiJ. W. (2011). The inadequacies of “Science for All” and the necessity and nature of a socially transformative curriculum approach for African American science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 301–316.
62.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (2017). Mplus. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
63.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
O’ConnellC.McKinnonM. (2021). Perceptions of barriers to career progression for academic women in STEM. Societies, 11(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020027
66.
PotvinP.HasniA. (2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x
67.
RennieL. J. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In LedermanN. G.AbekkS. K. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. ii, pp. 134–158). Routledge.
68.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10391657
69.
ScottA.MartinA. (2014). Perceived barriers to higher education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2014006999
70.
ScottC. E. (2012). An investigation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools in the US. Journal of STEM education: Innovations and Research, 13(5), 30–39.
71.
SeoE.ShenY.AlfaroE. C. (2019). Adolescents’ beliefs about math ability and their relations to STEM career attainment: Joint consideration of race/ethnicity and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0911-9
72.
SettlesI. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261885
73.
SettlesI. H.O’ConnorR. C.YapS. C. Y. (2016). Climate perceptions and identity interference among undergraduate women in STEM. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(4), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316655806
74.
ShaL.SchunnC.BathgateM.Ben-EliyahuA. (2016). Families support their children’s success in science learning by influencing interest and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21251
75.
SimpkinsS. D.Davis-KeanP. E.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
StipekD. (2013). Mathematics in early childhood education: Revolution or evolution?Early Education and Development, 24(4), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2013.777285
TanE.Calabrese BartonA.KangH.O’NeillT. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123
80.
TurnerS. L.JoengJ. R.SimsM. D.DadeS. N.ReidM. F. (2019). SES, gender, and STEM career interests, goals, and actions: A test of SCCT. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 134–150. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1069072717748665
81.
TysonW.LeeR.BormanK. M.HansonM. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 12(3), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660701601266
82.
Umaña-TaylorA. J.QuintanaS. M.LeeR. M.CrossW. E.JrRivas-DrakeD.SchwartzS. J. (2014). Ethnic and racial identity during adolescence and into young adulthood: An integrated conceptualization. Child Development, 85(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12196
83.
UNESCO. (2022). Gender report: Deeping the debate on those still left behind. Author.
84.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.SteigerJ. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Education & Psychology, 102(4), 860.
85.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
86.
WangM.-T.EcclesJ. S.KennyS. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937
87.
WangM.-T.YeF.DegolJ. L. (2017). Who chooses STEM careers? Using a relative cognitive strength and interest model to predict careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1805–1820.
88.
WattH. M.EcclesJ. S. (2008). Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. American Psychological Association.
89.
ZhaoM.MathewsC. J.MulveyK. L.Hartstone-RoseA.McGuireL.HoffmanA. J.McGuireL.WinterbottomM.JoyA.LawF.BalkwillF.BurnsK.ButlerL.DrewsM.FieldsG.SmithH.RutlandA. (2023). Promoting diverse youth’s career development through Informal Science Learning: The role of inclusivity and belonging. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(2), 331–343.
90.
ZhaoM.OzturkE.LawF.JoyA.DeutschA. R.MarlowC. S.MathewsC. J.McGuireL.HoffmanA. J.BalkwillF.BurnsK. P.ButlerL.DrewsM.FieldsG.SmithH.WinterbottomM.MulveyK. L.Hartstone-RoseA.RutlandA. (2024). Reciprocal associations between science efficacy, STEM identity and scientist career interest among adolescent girls within the context of informal science learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53, 472–484.
91.
ZhaoT.Perez-FelknerL. (2022). Perceived abilities or academic interests? Longitudinal high school science and mathematics effects on postsecondary STEM outcomes by gender and race. International Journal of Stem Education, 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00356-w
