This study seeks to explore the relationship between mental well-being and engagement, attitudes, and perceptions of social media use across adolescents. This study is based on a survey of adolescents (n = 3,568, mean age = 17.3) conducted in 2020 and 2021. Mental well-being was assessed using the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and categorized into low, mid-range and high mental well-being. Social media activity was measured using 11 statements related to engagement, attitudes, and perceptions of social media use. Bayesian cumulative ordinal regression models were employed to estimate the association between each of these statements and mental well-being. Adolescents with high mental well-being were more likely to report increased engagement in social media activities related to social orientation and group chatting than those with mid-range well-being. The results suggest that engaging in social behavior on social media may be indicative of healthy online activities.
AndersonM.JiangJ. (2018a). Teens’ social media habits and experiences. Pew Research Center.
3.
AndersonM.JiangJ. (2018b). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center.
4.
Ben-ShacharM. S.LüdeckeD.MakowskiD. (2020). effectsize: Estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(56), 2815. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815
5.
BestP.ManktelowR.TaylorB. J. (2014). Social work and social media: Online help-seeking and the mental well-being of adolescent males. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(1), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu130
6.
BeyensI.PouwelsJ. L.van DrielI. I.KeijsersL.ValkenburgP. M. (2021). Social media use and adolescents’ well-being: Developing a typology of person-specific effect patterns. Communication Research, 51(6), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211038196
7.
BookerC. L.KellyY. J.SackerA. (2018). Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10–15 year olds in the UK. BMC Public Health, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5220-4
8.
BürknerP.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of statistical software, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
9.
BürknerP.-C.VuorreM. (2019). Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199
10.
BøeT.DearingE.StormarkK. M.ZachrissonH. D. (2018). Subjective economic status in adolescence: Determinants and associations with mental health in the Norwegian Youth@ Hordaland Study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9553-4
11.
DesjarlaisM. (2022). The socially poor get richer, the rich get poorer: The effect of online self-disclosure on social connectedness and well-being is conditional on social anxiety and audience size. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2022-4-4
12.
FrisonE.EggermontS. (2020). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Communication Research, 47(5), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215617506
13.
GaleC. R.BoothT.MõttusR.KuhD.DearyI. J. (2013). Neuroticism and extraversion in youth predict mental wellbeing and life satisfaction 40 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.005
14.
Gil de ZúñigaH.DiehlT.HuberB.LiuJ. (2017). Personality traits and social media use in 20 countries: How personality relates to frequency of social media use, social media news use, and social media use for social interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(9), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0295
15.
HaddockA.WardN.YuR.O’DeaN. (2022). Positive effects of digital technology use by adolescents: A scoping review of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114009
16.
HjetlandG. J.SchønningV.HellaR. T.VesethM.SkogenJ. C. (2021). How do Norwegian adolescents experience the role of social media in relation to mental health and well-being: A qualitative study. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00582-x
17.
HoodM.CreedP. A.MillsB. J. (2018). Loneliness and online friendships in emerging adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.045
18.
HuangC. (2019). Social network site use and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.009
19.
KingT. L.ShieldsM.SojoV.DaraganovaG.CurrierD.O’NeilA.KingK.MilnerA. (2020). Expressions of masculinity and associations with suicidal ideation among young males. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-2475-y
20.
KingsburyM.RemeB.-A.SkogenJ. C.SivertsenB.ØverlandS.CantorN.HysingM.PetrieK.ColmanI. (2021). Differential associations between types of social media use and university students’ non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106614
21.
KrautR.KieslerS.BonevaB.CummingsJ.HelgesonV.CrawfordA. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00248
22.
LeonhardtM.OveråS. (2021). Are there differences in video gaming and use of social media among boys and girls?—A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116085
23.
LinX.SuW.PotenzaM. N. (2018). Development of an online and offline integration hypothesis for healthy internet use: Theory and preliminary evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00492
24.
LuoM.HancockJ. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019
25.
LönnqvistJ.-E.große DetersF. (2016). Facebook friends, subjective well-being, social support, and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.002
26.
Massing-SchafferM.NesiJ.TelzerE. H.LindquistK. A.PrinsteinM. J. (2022). Adolescent peer experiences and prospective suicidal ideation: The protective role of online-only friendships. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 51(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1750019
NesiJ.Choukas-BradleyS.PrinsteinM. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x
29.
OrbenA.LucasR. E.FuhrmannD.KievitR. A. (2022). Trajectories of adolescent life satisfaction. Royal Society Open Science, 9(8), 211808. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211808
OrbenA.PrzybylskiA. K.BlakemoreS.-J.KievitR. A. (2022). Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media. Nature Communications, 13(1), 1649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3
32.
PanayiotouM.BlackL.Carmichael-MurphyP.QualterP.HumphreyN. (2023). Time spent on social media among the least influential factors in adolescent mental health: Preliminary results from a panel network analysis. Nature Mental Health, 1(5), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00063-7
33.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M.SchoutenA. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(5), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.423
34.
Posit Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R [Computer software]. Posit Software. http://www.posit.co/
35.
PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN. (2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438
36.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Core Team. https://www.R-project.org/
37.
RalphB. (2023). The significance of men’s more intimate same-gender friendships. In RalphB. (Ed.), Destabilising masculinism: Men’s friendships and social change (pp. 1–28). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-39535-2_1
38.
RousseauA.FrisonE.EggermontS. (2019). The reciprocal relations between Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and adolescents’ closeness to friends. Journal of Adolescence, 76, 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.09.001
39.
RyanT.AllenK. A.GrayD. L.McInerneyD. M. (2017). How social are social media? A review of online social behaviour and connectedness. Journal of Relationships Research, 8, e8. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2017.13
40.
SalaA.PorcaroL.GómezE. (2024). Social media use and adolescents’ mental health and well-being: An umbrella review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100404
41.
SchønningV.HjetlandG. J.AarøL. E.SkogenJ. C. (2020). Social media use and mental health and well-being among adolescents—A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01949
42.
SjobergD. D.WhitingK.CurryM.LaveryJ. A.LarmarangeJ. (2021). Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary package. The R Journal, 13(1), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2021-053
43.
SkogenJ. C.AndersenA. I. O.FinseråsT. R.RanganathP.BrunborgG. S.HjetlandG. J. (2023). Commonly reported negative experiences on social media are associated with poor mental health and well-being among adolescents: Results from the “LifeOnSoMe”-study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1192788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1192788
44.
SkogenJ. C.HjetlandG. J.BøeT.HellaR. T.KnudsenA. K. (2021). Through the looking glass of social media. Focus on self-presentation and association with mental health and quality of life. A cross-sectional survey-based study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063319
45.
SmithO. R.AlvesD. E.KnapstadM.HaugE.AarøL. E. (2017). Measuring mental well-being in Norway: Validation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). BMC Psychiatry, 17, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1343-x
46.
SjolieH.OlsenC. F.HempelM. F. (2024). Attachments or Affiliations? The Impact of Social Media on the Quality of Peer Relationships—A Qualitative Study Among Norwegian High School Students. Youth & Society, 56(4), 673–692. DOI: 10.1177/0044118X231171180
47.
SteinsbekkS.BjørklundO.ValkenburgP.NesiJ.WichstrømL. (2024). The new social landscape: Relationships among social media use, social skills, and offline friendships from age 10–18 years. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108235
48.
TanhanF.ÖzokH. İ.TayizV. (2022). Fear of missing out (FoMO): A current review. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar, 14(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.942431
49.
TennantR.HillerL.FishwickR.PlattS.JosephS.WeichS.ParkinsonJ.SeckerJ.Stewart-BrownS. (2007). The Warwick–Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
TownerE.GrintJ.LevyT.BlakemoreS.-J.TomovaL. (2022). Revealing the self in a digital world: A systematic review of adolescent online and offline self-disclosure. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101309
52.
TurnerR. J. (1981). Social support as a contingency in psychological well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136677
53.
ValkenburgP. M.MeierA.BeyensI. (2021). Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.017
54.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
55.
ValkenburgP. M.van DrielI. I.BeyensI. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425
VerduynP.GugushviliN.KrossE. (2022). Do social networking sites influence well-being? The extended active-passive model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211053637
58.
VerduynP.YbarraO.RésiboisM.JonidesJ.KrossE. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
WebsterD.DunneL.HunterR. (2021). Association between social networks and subjective well-being in adolescents: A systematic review. Youth & Society, 53(2), 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X20919589
61.
WeinsteinE. (2018). The social media see-saw: Positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being. New media & society, 20(10), 3597–3623. DOI: 10.1177/1461444818755634
62.
ZiegeleM.ReineckeL. (2017). No place for negative emotions? The effects of message valence, communication channel, and social distance on users’ willingness to respond to SNS status updates. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.016
