The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of mutual relations within the Problematic Smartphone Use (PSU) (first network) and between adolescent mental health problems and PSU (second network). The invariance of both networks was investigated across age, gender, and severity of symptoms. The participants were 708 Romanian adolescents (Mage = 16). Analyses were performed in RStudio. The results indicated that the most central node in the PSU network was a preoccupation symptom. The strongest bridge path laid between a reckless symptom and PSU. The networks were invariant with respect to the gender of the adolescents but were different—both in structure and strength—between the adolescents with low vs. high total difficulties. Furthermore, the networks were significantly different in terms of structure between middle and late adolescents. These findings are further discussed.
AljomaaS. S.Al.QudahM. F.AlbursanI. S.BakhietS. F.AbduljabbarA. S. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.041
2.
AndradeA. L. M.ScatenaA.MartinsG. D. G.de PinheiroB.BeckerdaSilvaA.EnesC. C.de OliveiraW. A.KimD.-J. (2020). Validation of smartphone addiction scale – Short version (SAS-SV) in Brazilian adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 110, 106540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106540
3.
BaiW.CaiH.WuS.ZhangL.FengK.-X.LiY.-C.LiuH. Z.DuX.ZengZ. T.LuC. M.MiW. F.ZhangL.DingY. H.YangJ. J.JacksonT.CheungT.AnF. R.XiangY. T.XiangY.-T. (2022). Internet addiction and its association with quality of life in patients with major depressive disorder: A network perspective. Translational Psychiatry, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01893-2
4.
BasenachL.RennebergB.SalbachH.DreierM.WölflingK. (2023). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 12(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00087
5.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
6.
BlinkaL.StašekA.ŠablatúrováN.ŠevčíkováA.HusarovaD. (2023). Adolescents’ problematic internet and smartphone use in (cyber)bullying experiences: A network analysis. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 28(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12628
7.
BorsboomD.CramerA. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
8.
BringmannL.ElmerT.EpskampS.KrauseR. W.SchochD.WichersM.WigmanJ. T. W.SnippeE. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000446
9.
BringmannL. F.AlbersC.BocktingC.BorsboomD.CeulemansE.CramerA.EpskampS.EronenM. I.HamakerE.KuppensP.LutzW.McNallyR. J.MolenaarP.TioP.VoelkleM. C.WichersM. (2022). Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 149, 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.104011
10.
BuschP. A.McCarthyS. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414
11.
CasaleS.FioravantiG.Bocci BenucciS.FaloneA.RiccaV.RotellaF. (2022). A meta-analysis on the association between self-esteem and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107302
12.
ChangW.-C.KoH.-C. (2023). Common and specific risk factors for comorbidity types of problematic smartphone use in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107656
13.
ChenY.HuoY. (2023). Social interaction anxiety and problematic smartphone use among rural-urban adolescents in China: A moderated moderated-mediation model. Youth & Society, 55(4), 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X221126548
14.
ConstantinM. A.SchuurmanN. K.VermuntJ. (2023). A general Monte Carlo method for sample size analysis in the context of network models. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000555
15.
CostantiniG.EpskampS.BorsboomD.PeruginiM.MõttusR.WaldorpL. J.CramerA. O. J. (2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
16.
DomoffS. E.FoleyR. P.FerkelR. (2020). Addictive phone use and academic performance in adolescents. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.171
17.
ElhaiJ. D.DvorakR. D.LevineJ. C.HallB. J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030
18.
EpskampS.BorsboomD.FriedE. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
19.
EpskampS.CostantiniG.HaslbeckJ.IsvoranuA.CramerA. O. J.WaldorpL. J.SchmittmannV. D.BorsboomD. (2022). qgraph: Graph plotting methods, psychometric data visualization and graphical model estimation (Version 1.9.2). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=qgraph
20.
EpskampS.FriedE. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
Fischer-GroteL.KothgassnerO. D.FelnhoferA. (2019). Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: A review of existing literature. Neuropsychiatrie, 33(4), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-019-00319-8
HaslbeckJ. M. B.WaldorpL. J. (2020). Mgm: Estimating time-varying mixed graphical models in high-dimensional data. Journal of Statistical Software, 93, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v093.i08
26.
HuangS.LaiX.LiY.LuoY.WangY. (2021). Understanding juveniles’ problematic smartphone use and related influencing factors: A network perspective. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(3), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00048
27.
HuangS.LaiX.XueY.ZhangC.WangY. (2020). A network analysis of problematic smartphone use symptoms in a student sample. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(4), 1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00098
28.
IoannidisK.HookR.GoudriaanA. E.VliesS.FinebergN. A.GrantJ. E.ChamberlainS. R. (2019). Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use: Meta-analysis of 40 studies. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 215(5), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.3
29.
KalaitzakiA.LaconiS.SpritzerD. T.HauckS.GnisciA.SergiI.VallyZ.TudorelO.VintilaM.MalikS.DiazJ. R.MännikköN.CikrikciO.SalasG.ArdilaR.ZambranoD.SahlanR. N. (2022). The prevalence and predictors of problematic mobile phone use: A 14-country empirical survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00901-2
30.
KamolthipR.ChirawatP.GhavifekrS.GanW. Y.TungS. E.NurmalaI.NadhirohS. R.PramuktiI.LinC.-Y. (2022). Problematic Internet use (PIU) in youth: A brief literature review of selected topics. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 46, 101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101150
31.
Kardefelt-WintherD. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
32.
KwonM.KimD.-J.ChoH.YangS. (2013). The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One, 8(12), e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
33.
LiuS.XuB.ZhangD.TianY.WuX. (2022). Core symptoms and symptom relationships of problematic internet use across early, middle, and late adolescence: A network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107090
34.
Lopez-FernandezO. (2017). Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale adapted to Spanish and French: Towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.013
35.
MancinelliE.RuoccoE.NapolitanoS.SalcuniS. (2022). A network analysis on self-harming and problematic smartphone use: The role of self-control, internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of self-harming adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 112, 152285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152285
36.
MariE.BiondiS.VarchettaM.CricentiC.FraschettiA.PizzoA.BarchielliB.RomaP.VilarM. M.Gonzàlez SalaF.GianniniA. M.QuaglieriA. (2023). Gender differences in internet addiction: A study on variables related to its possible development. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 9, 100247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100247
37.
MengS.-Q.ChengJ.-L.LiY.-Y.YangX.-Q.ZhengJ.-W.ChangX.-W.ShiY.ChenY.LuL.SunY.BaoY. P.ShiJ. (2022). Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 92, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102128
38.
OlsonJ. A.SandraD. A.ColucciÉ. S.Al BikaiiA.ChmoulevitchD.NahasJ.RazA.VeissièreS. P. L. (2022). Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107138
39.
PanovaT.CarbonellX. (2018). Is smartphone addiction really an addiction?Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.49
40.
PăsăreluC. R.DobreanA. (2018). An investigation of mediators for the relationship between parent mental health and adolescent problematic Internet use: A cross-sectional study in Romanian adolescents. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 18(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2018.2.16
41.
RanG.LiJ.ZhangQ.NiuX. (2022). The association between social anxiety and mobile phone addiction: A three-level meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107198
RibeiroW. S.GrandeA. J.HoffmannM. S.ZieboldC.McDaidD.FryA.PeixotoC.MirandaC.KingD.TomasiC. D.FaustinoC.LeoneS.MoraesS.SchäferA. A.AlvesV.RosaM. I.Evans-LackoS. (2023). A systematic review of evidence-based interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems in low- and middle-income countries. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 121, 152358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152358
44.
RobinaughD. J.MillnerA. J.McNallyR. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181
45.
RoefsA.FriedE. I.KindtM.MartijnC.ElzingaB.EversA. W. M.WiersR. W.BorsboomD.JansenA. (2022). A new science of mental disorders: Using personalised, transdiagnostic, dynamical systems to understand, model, diagnose and treat psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 153, 104096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104096
46.
RozgonjukD.LevineJ. C.HallB. J.ElhaiJ. D. (2018). The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.019
47.
RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio. http://www.rstudio.com/
48.
RumpfH.-J.EffertzT.MontagC. (2022). The cost burden of problematic internet usage. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 44, 101107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101107
49.
SohnS. Y.ReesP.WildridgeB.KalkN. J.CarterB. (2019). Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: A systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry, 19(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2350-x
50.
SolmiM.RaduaJ.OlivolaM.CroceE.SoardoL.Salazar de PabloG.IlShinJ.KirkbrideJ. B.JonesP.KimJ. H.KimJ. Y.CarvalhoA. F.SeemanM. V.CorrellC. U.Fusar-PoliP. (2022). Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: Large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7
51.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed, pp. xxvii, 980). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
52.
TatenoM.KatoT. A.ShirasakaT.KanazawaJ.UkaiW.HirotaT. (2022). A network analysis of problematic smartphone use in Japanese young adults. PLoS One, 17(8), e0272803. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272803
53.
ThomasC. L.IngelsD. J.KazmiM. A.OhuE. A.BelleC.SpitzmuellerC. (2022). Adolescents’ problematic internet use in secondary school students in Lagos, Nigeria: A preliminary examination of individual and family-based predictors and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107247
54.
TibshiraniR. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
55.
van BorkuloC.EpskampS.JonesP.HaslbeckJ.MillnerA. (2019). NetworkComparisonTest: Statistical comparison of two networks based on three invariance measures (Version 2.2.1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NetworkComparisonTest
56.
van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK.VinkG.SchoutenR.RobitzschA.DooveL.JolaniS.Moreno-BetancurM.WhiteI.GaffertP.MeinfelderF.GrayB.Arel-BundockV.CaiM.VolkerT.CostantiniE.van LissaC.ObermanH. (2020). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations (Version 3.8.0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mice
WangA.WangZ.ZhuY.ShiX. (2022). The prevalence and psychosocial factors of problematic smartphone use among Chinese college students: A three-wave longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877277. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877277
59.
WeiX.JiangH.WangH.GengJ.GaoT.LeiL.RenL. (2022). The relationship between components of neuroticism and problematic smartphone use in adolescents: A network analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111325
60.
WeiX.-Y.RenL.JiangH.-B.LiuC.WangH.-X.GengJ.-Y.GaoT.WangJ.LeiL. (2023). Does adolescents’ social anxiety trigger problematic smartphone use, or vice versa? A comparison between problematic and unproblematic smartphone users. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107602
61.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
62.
YangS.-Y.LinC.-Y.HuangY.-C.ChangJ.-H. (2018). Gender differences in the association of smartphone use with the vitality and mental health of adolescent students. Journal of American College Health, 66(7), 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1454930
63.
YangZ.YanZ.HussainZ. (2022). The relationships between smartphone distraction, problematic smartphone use and mental health issues amongst a Chinese sample. The Social Science Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2022.2066880
