The present study focuses on understanding the online aggression in adolescent couples from a gender-sensitive perspective. Specifically, the aims were: (1) to analyze the direct relationship between online jealousy and online control among adolescent boys and girls and (2) to explore the moderating role of moral disengagement and socio-emotional competence in the association between online jealousy and online control by gender. The sample comprised 1,160 high school students (52.7% girls) aged between 12 and 17 years (M = 14.25, SD = 1.35). The study design was cross-sectional. The moderation analysis revealed that online jealousy was directly related to the perpetration of online control. Moral disengagement strengthened the relationship between online jealousy and online control among both boys and girls, while socio-emotional competence weakened it, but only among girls. The results are discussed considering the gender differences found and the practical implications for programs designed to promote healthy dating relationships.
BakerC. K.CarreñoP. K. (2016). Understanding the role of technology in adolescent dating and dating violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(1), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0196-5
2.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behaviour and development: Theory (Vol. 1, pp. 45–103). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
4.
BorrajoE.Gámez-GuadixM.CalveteE. (2015a). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports, 116(2), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4
5.
BorrajoE.Gámez-GuadixM.CalveteE. (2015b). Justification beliefs of violence, myths about love and cyber dating abuse. Psicothema, 27(4), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.59
6.
BransonM.MarchE. (2021). Dangerous dating in the digital age: Jealousy, hostility, narcissism, and psychopathy as predictors of cyber dating abuse. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106711
7.
BremM. J.SpillerL. C.VandeheyM. A. (2015). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2831–2850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554286
8.
BusseyK.FitzpatrickS.RamanA. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
9.
CapaldiD. M.ShorttJ.W.KimH. K. (2005). A life span developmental systems perspective on aggression toward a partner. In PinsofW.LebowJ. (Eds.), Family psychology: The art of the science (pp. 141–167). Oxford University Press.
10.
CaridadeS.BragaT. (2020). Youth cyber dating abuse: A meta-analysis of risk and protective factors. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-3-2
11.
CavaM. J.Martínez-FerrerB.BuelgaS.CarrascosaL. (2020). Sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and offline dating violence as predictors of cyber dating violence perpetration in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106449
12.
ConnollyJ. A.McIsaacC. (2009). Romantic relationships in adolescence. In LernerR. A.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 104–151). John Wiley & Sons.
13.
CuiM.UenoK.GordonM.FinchamF. D. (2013). The continuation of intimate partner violence from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12016
14.
DavilaJ.SteinbergS. J.MillerM. R.StroudC. B.StarrL. R.YonedaA. (2009). Assessing romantic competence in adolescence: The romantic competence interview. Journal of Adolescence, 32(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.12.001
15.
DeansH.BhogalM. S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4
16.
EisnerM. (2021). The gender symmetry problem in physical teen dating violence: A commentary and suggestions for a research agenda. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 178, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20443
17.
FarrellA. H.VaillancourtT. (2019). Temperament, bullying, and dating aggression: Longitudinal associations for adolescents in a romantic relationship. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919847450
18.
Fernández-GonzálezL.CalveteE.OrueI.EchezarragaA. (2018). The role of emotional intelligence in the maintenance of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.038
19.
GalendeN.Ozamiz-EtxebarriaN.JaureguizarJ.RedondoI. (2020). Cyber dating violence prevention programs in universal populations: A systematic review. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 1089. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S275414
20.
HalpernD.KatzJ. E.CarrilC. (2017). The online ideal persona vs. the jealousy effect: Two explanations of why selfies are associated with lower-quality romantic relationships. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.014
21.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
22.
HinesD. A.SaudinoK. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.197
23.
HoferM. (2017). Mean centering. In MatthesJ.PotterR.DavisC. S. (Eds.), The international Encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 248–269). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0137
24.
IacobucciD.SchneiderM. J.PopovichD. L.BakamitsosG. (2016). Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0624-x
25.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293328
26.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M.XuY. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214521324
27.
Lo CricchioM. G.García-PooleC.te BrinkeL. W.BianchiD.MenesiniE. (2021). Moral disengagement and cyberbullying involvement: A systematic review. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 271–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1782186
28.
LuceroJ. L.WeiszA. N.Smith-DardenJ.LuceroS. M. (2014). Exploring gender differences: Socially interactive technology use/abuse among dating teens. Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work, 29(4), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109914522627
29.
MafteiA.DănilăO. (2021). Give me your password! What are you hiding? Associated factors of intimate partner violence through technological abuse. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02197-2
30.
MazzoneA.YanagidaT.CaravitaS.StrohmeierD. (2019). Moral emotions and moral disengagement: Concurrent and longitudinal associations with aggressive behavior among early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(6), 839–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618791276
31.
MenesiniE.NocentiniA.Ortega-RiveraJ.Sánchez-JiménezV.Ortega-RuizR. (2011). Reciprocal involvement in adolescent dating aggression: An Italian-Spanish study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(4), 437–451. http://dx.doi.org/0.1080/17405629.2010.549011
32.
MuiseA.ChristofidesE.DesmaraisS. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
33.
MuiseA.ChristofidesE.DesmaraisS. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12014
34.
NocentiniA.Muñoz-FernándezN.MenesiniE.Sánchez-JiménezV. (2021). Longitudinal risk profiles for physical, psychological, and sexual dating aggression: A latent profile analysis with Spanish adolescents. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00623-5
ReedL. A.LawlerS. M.CosgroveJ. M.TolmanR. M.WardL. M. (2021). “It was a joke:” Patterns in girls’ and boys’ self-reported motivations for digital dating abuse behaviors. Children and Youth Services Review, 122, 105883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105883
37.
Rodríguez-deArribaM. L.NocentiniA.MenesiniE.Sánchez-JiménezV. (2021). Dimensions and measures of cyber dating violence in adolescents: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101613
38.
RomeraE. M.CasasJ. A.Gómez-OrtizO.Ortega-RuizR. (2019). Moral domain as a risk and protective factor against bullying. An integrating perspective review on the complexity of morality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.005
39.
Rubio-GarayF.AmorP.CarrascoM. (2019). The contribution of moral disengagement to dating violence and general aggression: The gender and age moderating effects. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, E59. http://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.57
40.
Rubio-GarayF.CarrascoM. Á.AmorP. J.López-GonzálezM. A. (2015). Factores asociados a la violencia en el noviazgo entre adolescentes: una revisión crítica. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2015.01.001
41.
Sánchez-JiménezV.Muñoz-FernándezN. (2021). When are sexist attitudes risk factors for dating aggression? The role of moral disengagement in Spanish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041947
42.
Sánchez-JiménezV.Muñoz-FernándezN.LucioL. A.Ortega-RuizR. (2017). Ciberagresión en parejas adolescentes: Un estudio transcultural España-México. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 34(1), 46–54. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=243056045005
43.
Sánchez-JiménezV.Muñoz-FernándezN.NocentiniA.Ortega-RuizR.MenesiniE. (2014). Online intrusiveness, online jealousy and dating aggression in young adults: A cross-national study (Spain-Italy). Maltrattamento e Abuso all’Infanzia, 16(3), 47–65.
44.
Sánchez-JiménezV.Muñoz-FernándezN.Ortega-RuízR. (2015). “Cyberdating Q_A”: An instrument to assess the quality of adolescent dating relationships in social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.006
45.
Sánchez-JiménezV.Rodríguez-deArribaM. L.Muñoz-FernándezN. (2021). Is this WhatsApp conversation aggressive? Adolescents’ perception of cyber dating aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211028011
46.
ShoreyR. C.BrasfieldH.FebresJ.StuartG. L. (2011). An examination of the association between difficulties with emotion regulation and dating violence perpetration. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(8), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.629342
47.
StonardK. E.BowenE.WalkerK.PriceS. A. (2017). “They’ll always find a way to get to you”: Technology use in adolescent romantic relationships and its role in dating violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(14), 2083–2117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515590787
48.
Van OuytselJ.PonnetK.WalraveM. (2020). Cyber dating abuse: Investigating digital monitoring behaviors among adolescents from a social learning perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5157–5178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517719538
49.
Van OuytselJ.Van GoolE.WalraveM.PonnetK.PeetersE. (2016). Exploring the role of social networking sites within adolescent romantic relationships and dating experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.042
50.
ViejoC.Sánchez-JiménezV.Ortega-RuizR. (2013). The importance of adolescent dating relationships. Psicothema, 25(1), 43–48. http://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.99
ZweigJ. M.DankM.YahnerJ.LachmanP. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8
53.
ZweigJ. M.YahnerJ.DankM.LachmanP. (2014). Can Johnson’s typology of adult partner violence apply to teen dating violence?Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 808–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12121
