Based on the third-person effect hypothesis–people’s belief that the media influences others more than it influences themselves–we administered a questionnaire to Chinese teens (N = 1,538) to discover the impacts of exposure to internet pornography on perceptions of pornography and attitudes toward censorship of pornography. The results validated the third-person effect hypothesis and showed that teens’ subjective perceptions of what constitutes internet pornography and their exposure to it are critical variables for predicting perceptions of negative impacts of pornography on self and others and affirmative attitudes toward censorship. The study also found that the impact on self is the best variable for predicting attitudes toward censorship. The discussion is framed in the context of Chinese collective culture and conservative attitudes toward sex.
Braun-CourvilleD. K.RojasM. (2009). Exposure to sexually explicit web sites and adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004
2.
BrownJ. D.L’EngleK. L. (2009). X-Rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208326465
3.
ChapinJ. (2001). It won’t happen to me: The role of optimistic bias in African American teens’ risky sexual practices. Howard Journal of Communications, 12(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170119661
4.
ChenH.WuY.AtkinD. J. (2015). Third person effect and internet pornography in China. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.004
5.
ChiaS. C.LuK.-H.McLeodD. M. (2004). Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship. Communication Research, 31(1), 109–130.
DanebackK.ŠevčíkováA.JežekS. (2018). Exposure to online sexual materials in adolescence and desensitization to sexual content. Sexologies, 27(3), e71–e76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2018.04.001
8.
DanebackK.TraeenB.MånssonS. A. (2009). Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 746–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4
9.
DavisonW. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
10.
DworkinR. (2013). Taking rights seriously. A&C Black.
11.
DwulitA. D.RzymskiP. (2019). Prevalence, patterns and self-perceived effects of pornography consumption in polish university students: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101861
12.
EndeshawA. (2004). Internet regulation in China: The never-ending cat and mouse game. Information & Communications Technology Law, 13(1), 41–57.
13.
FloodM. (2009). The harms of pornography exposure among children and young people. Child Abuse Review, 18(6), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1092
14.
GuntherA. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third- person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018003004
15.
GuntherA. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00712.x
HartH. L. A. (1963). Law, liberty, and morality. Standford University Press.
18.
HoffnerC.BuchananM.AndersonJ. D.HubbsL. A.KamigakiS. K.KowalczykL.PastorekA.PlotkinR. S.SilbergK. J. (1999). Support for censorship of television violence: The role of the third-person effect and news exposure. Communication Research, 26, 726–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026006004
19.
HunterJ. A.FigueredoA. J.MalamuthN. M. (2010). Developmental pathways into social and sexual deviance. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9277-9
20.
JeffreysE. (2015). Sex in China. John Wiley & Sons.
21.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.
22.
LeeB.TamboriniR. (2005). Third-person effect and Internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02673.x
23.
LeungW. C.LoV.-H. (2015). Perceived harm of online drug-encouraging messages: Third-person effect and adolescents’ support for rectifying measures. Youth & Society, 47, 850–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x14565622
24.
LimJ. S. (2017). The third-person effect of online advertising of cosmetic surgery: A path model for predicting restrictive versus corrective actions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 972–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016687722
25.
LoV. H.SoC. Y. K.ZhangG. (2010). The influence of individualism and collectivism on internet pornography exposure, sexual attitudes, and sexual behavior among college students. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750903528724
26.
LoV. H.WeiR. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the lnternet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_2
27.
LoV.PaddonA. (2001). Third-person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication, 11(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980109364795
28.
LoV.WuX.XiangQ.LiuH. (2008). Influence of internet pornography and interactive activities on teens’ attitude towards sex and sex behaviors. Communication & Society Journal, 5, 35–69.
29.
MalamuthN. M.AddisonT.KossM. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them?Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.
30.
McLeodD. M.DetenberB. H.EvelandW. P. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51(4), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02902.x
31.
OwensE. W.BehunR. J.ManningJ. C.ReidR. C. (2012). The impact of internet pornography on adolescents: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 19(1-2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2012.660431
PattersonR.PriceJ. (2012). Pornography, religion, and the happiness gap: Does pornography impact the actively religious differently?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01630.x
34.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2006). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321754
35.
PosnerR. A. (1994). Sex and reason. Harvard University Press.
RojasH.ShahD. V.FaberR. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.163
38.
RostadW. L.Gittins-StoneD.HuntingtonC.RizzoC. J.PearlmanD.OrchowskiL. (2019). The association between exposure to violent pornography and teen dating violence in grade 10 high school students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(7), 2137–2147.
39.
SalwenM. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25(3), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025003001
40.
SalwenM. B.DriscollP. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47(2), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02706.x
41.
SalwenM. B.DupagneM. (2001). Third-person perception of television violence: The role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychology, 3(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0303_01
42.
StephenJ. F. (1967). Liberty, equality, fraternity. Cambridge University Press.
43.
TsfatiY.CohenJ. (2003). On the effect of the “third-person effect”: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 711–727.
44.
WeinbergM. S.WilliamsC. J.KleinerS.IrizarryY. (2010). Pornography, normalization, and empowerment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(6), 1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9592-5
45.
WilloughbyB. J.BusbyD. M. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Exploring variations in the perceptions of pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 53(6), 678–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1013601
46.
WilloughbyB. J.BusbyD. M.Young-PetersenB. (2019). Understanding associations between personal definitions of pornography, using pornography, and depression. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0345-x
47.
WuW.KooS. H. (2001). Perceived effects of sexually explicit internet content: The third-person effect in singapore. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800204
48.
YanM. N. (2014). Regulating online pornography in mainland China and Hong Kong. In McLelland, M., & Mackie, V. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sexuality studies in East Asia (pp. 405–419). Routledge.
49.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2005). Exposure to internet pornography among children and adolescents: A national survey. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8(5), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.473
50.
YinY.LoV.LuH.WeiR. (2020). Third-person effect of young people in the 2016 Taiwanese presidential election. Journal of Communication Research and Practice, 10(1), 141–172.
51.
YuW. (2008). “Third-person effect” of internet Kuso – A survey conducted among 1,772 Shanghai citizens. Journalism and Communications, 2, 83–88.
52.
ZhangL.LiX.ShahI. H. (2007). Where do Chinese adolescents obtain knowledge of sex? Implications for sex education in China.. Health Education.
53.
ZhaoX.CaiX. (2008). From self-enhancement to supporting censorship: The third-person effect process in the case of Internet pornography. Mass Communication & Society, 11(4), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430802071258
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
