This study evaluated the injury prevention program, Skills for Preventing Injury in Youth (SPIY) for Year 9 students (aged 13–14 years). The aim of SPIY was to reduce adolescent injury by reducing engagement in risk-taking behaviors. A randomized controlled trial was conducted and data analyzed with 32 schools, N = 2,739 students at baseline. Students’ self-reported injury prior to the commencement of SPIY and at 6 and 12 months after the program concluded. For those with few protective factors at baseline, there was less increase in alcohol-related injuries and a decline in violence-related injuries for intervention compared with control students. Findings showed the SPIY program can be effective in reducing adolescent injury for those with few promotive factors.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). My school data. https://www.acara.edu.au/
4.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2017a). Australia’s health 2016 (Cat. No. AUS 199).
5.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2017b). National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2016: Detailed findings (Drug Statistics Series, 31; Cat. No. PHE 214).
6.
BowenN. K.FloraD. B. (2002). When is it appropriate to focus on protection in interventions for adolescents?American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 526–538.
7.
BuckleyL.ChapmanR. (2020). Resiliency in adolescence: Cumulative risk and promotive factors explain violence and transportation risk behaviors. Youth & Society, 52, 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17753814
8.
BuckleyL.ChapmanR.SheehanM. (2012). Adolescent involvement in anti-social and delinquent behaviours: Predicting future injury risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 48, 518–522.
9.
BuckleyL.SheehanM. (2007, November). Does an ecological model explain self-report motorcycle use and injuries among early adolescents? [Conference session]. Australasian Road Safety Research Policing and Education Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
10.
BuckleyL.SheehanM. (2010). An adolescent injury intervention: Selecting targeted behaviours with implications for program design and evaluation. Australian Health Review, 34, 487–492.
11.
BuckleyL.SheehanM.ShochetI. (2010). Short-term evaluation of a school-based adolescent injury prevention program: Determining positive effects or iatrogenic outcomes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 834–853.
12.
BuckleyL.SheehanM.ShochetI.ChapmanR. (2013). Towards an integration of the theory of planned behaviour and cognitive behavioural strategies: An example from a school-based injury prevention programme. Education Studies, 39(3), 285–297.
13.
ChapmanR.BuckleyL.SheehanM. (2011). The development of the Extended-Adolescent Injury Checklist (E-AIC): A measure for injury prevention program evaluation. Youth Studies Australia, 30, 49–58.
14.
ChapmanR.BuckleyL.SheehanM.ShochetI. (2012). The impact of school connectedness on violent behavior, transport risk taking behavior and associated injuries in adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 399–410.
15.
ChapmanR.BuckleyL.SheehanM.ShochetI. (2013). Pilot evaluation of an adolescent risk and injury prevention programme incorporating curriculum and school connectedness components. Health Education & Research, 28, 12–25.
16.
ElliottM. R.ShopeJ. T.RaghunathanT. E.WallerP. F. (2006). Gender differences among young drivers in the association between high-risk driving and substance use/environmental influences. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(2), 252–260.
17.
GoodenowC. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90.
18.
HallM. D.CrossP.HowatM.StevensonM.ShawT. (2004). Evaluation of a school-based peer leader bicycle helmet intervention. Injury Control & Safety Prevention, 11, 165–174.
19.
HeinzeJ. E.StoddardS. A.AiyerS.EisemanA. B.ZimmermanM. A. (2017). Exposure to violence during adolescence as a predictor of perceived stress trajectories in emerging adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 49, 31–38.
20.
JelalianE.SpiritoA.RasileD.VinickL.RohrbeckC.ArriganM. (1997). Risk taking, reported injury, and perception of future injury among adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(4), 513–531.
21.
JessorR.TurbinM.CostaF.DongQ.ZhangH.WangC. (2003). Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 329–360.
KellyA. B.ConnorJ. P. (2012). Some universal family-based prevention programmes provide small reductions in alcohol use in youths in the short and long term. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 15(1), 16.
24.
MartinG.HaskingnP.TatnellR. C. (2015). Adolescents’ reactions to participating in ethically sensitive research: A prospective self-report study. Child Adolescent Psychiatry & Mental Health, 9, Article 39.
25.
McBrideN.FarringdonF.MidfordR.MeulenersL.PhillipsM. (2004). Harm minimization in school drug education: Final results of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP). Addiction, 91, 278–291.
26.
OnrustS. A.OttenR.LammersJ.SmitF. (2016). School-based programmes to reduce and prevent substance use in different age groups: What works for whom? Systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 44, 45–59.
27.
ParkerG.TuplingH.BrownL. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10.
28.
PekárS.BrabecM. (2018). Generalized estimating equations: A pragmatic and flexible approach to the marginal GLM modelling of correlated data in the behavioural sciences. Ethology, 124(2), 86–93.
29.
PickettW.GarnerM. J.BoyceW. F.KingM. A. (2002). Gradients in risk for youth injury associated with multiple-risk behaviours: A study of 11,329 Canadian adolescents. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1055–1068.
30.
RanganathanP.PrameshC. S.BuyseM. (2015). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 6(3), 169. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.159943
StoddardS. A.WhitesideL.ZimmermanM. A.CunninghamR. M.ChermackS. T.WaltonM. A. (2013). The relationship between cumulative risk and promotive factors and violent behavior among urban adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 57–65.
33.
StoddardS. A.ZimmermanM. A.BaumeisterJ. A. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of cumulative risks, cumulative promotive factors, and adolescent violent behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 542–555.
34.
ToblerN. S.StrattonH. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128.
35.
TollitM. A.HemphillS.ToumbourouJ. W. (2017). Understanding and responding to adolescent risk-taking behaviours and addictions in the school setting. In ThielkingM.TerjesenM. (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology (pp. 291–310). Springer.
36.
van GinkelJ. R.LintingM.RippeR. C.van der VoortA. (2019). Rebutting existing misconceptions about multiple imputation as a method for handling missing data. Journal of Personality Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680
37.
ZimmermanM. A. (2013). Resiliency theory: A strengths-based approach to research and practice for adolescent health. Health Education & Behavior, 40, 381–383.
