Drawing on participatory research in a high school implementing single-sex classes, this article demonstrates how single-sex education masks racialized economic inequality by framing low academic achievement among low-income youth of color as a function of gender, thereby scapegoating girls for a supposed “boy crisis” in education. We demonstrate this with data collected by and from students, as well as from educators and parents, delineating how girls of color were held accountable for boys’ sexual and even academic behavior. We argue that this misattribution of blame succeeds by capitalizing on entrenched gender roles that cast girls/women as responsible for boys/men and on neoliberal rhetoric trumpeting postfeminist, commercialized “girl power” and the virtue of personal responsibility. We focus particularly on how girls’ supposed newfound empowerment is folded into the long-standing discourse of girl blame by posing girl power as a problem for boys.
AbramovitzM. (2018). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present (3rd ed.). Routledge.
2.
American Association of University Women. (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school.
3.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2012). Recovering empowerment: De-personalizing and re-politicizing adolescent female sexuality (Commentary). Sex Roles, 66, 713–717.
4.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73, 279–291.
5.
Bay-ChengL. Y.BrunsA. E.MaguinE. (2018). Agents, virgins, sluts, and losers: The sexual typecasting of young heterosexual women. Sex Roles, 79, 699–714.
6.
BillgerS. M. (2009). On reconstructing school segregation: The efficacy and equity of single-sex schooling. Economics of Education Review, 28, 393–402.
7.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
8.
BrownL. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York University Press.
9.
CohenD. S. (2009). No boy left behind: Single-sex education and the essentialist myth of masculinity. Indiana Law Journal, 84, 135–188.
10.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. Routledge.
11.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–167.
12.
EpsteinR.BlakeJ.GonzálezT. (2017). Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of Black girls’ childhood. Georgetown Law Center on Poverty and Inequality.
13.
FroyumC. M. (2010). Making “good girls”: Sexual agency in the sexuality education of low-income Black girls. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12, 59–72.
14.
GaarderE.RodriguezN.ZatzM. S. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers’ views of girls. Justice Quarterly, 21, 547–578.
15.
GillR. (2008a). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25, 432–445.
16.
GillR. (2008b). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35–60.
17.
GonickM. (2006). Between “girl power” and “reviving Ophelia”: Constituting the neoliberal girl subject. NWSA Journal, 18, 1–23.
18.
GoodkindS. (2009). “You can be anything you want, but you have to believe it”: Commercialized feminism in gender-specific programs for girls. Signs, 34, 397–422.
19.
GoodkindS. (2013). Single-sex public education for low-income youth of color: A critical theoretical review. Sex Roles, 69, 393–402.
20.
GoodkindS.SchelbeL.JosephA.BeersD.PinskyS. (2013). Providing new opportunities or reinforcing old stereotypes? Perceptions and experiences of single-sex public education. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1174–1181.
21.
HarrisA. (2004). Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
22.
HayesA. R.PahlkeE. E.BiglerR. S. (2011). The efficacy of single-sex education: Testing for selection and peer quality effects. Sex Roles, 65, 693–703.
HubbardL.DatnowA. (2005). Do single-sex schools improve the education of low-income and minority students? An investigation of California’s public single-gender academies. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 115–131.
26.
KleinS. (2012). State of public school sex segregation in the United States 2007-2010. Feminist Majority Foundation.
27.
LambS.KovenJ. (2019). Sexualization of girls: Addressing criticism of the APA report, presenting new evidence. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019881024
28.
LukeK. P. (2008). Are girls really becoming more violent? A critical analysis. Affilia, 23, 38–50.
29.
McRobbieA. (2008). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture, and social change. SAGE.
MorrisE. W. (2007). “Ladies” or “loudies”? Perceptions and experiences of Black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38, 490–515.
32.
National Association for Single Sex Public Education. (2012). Single-sex schools/Schools with single-sex classrooms/What’s the difference?http://www.singlesexschools.org/
33.
National Women’s Law Center. (2018). Dress coded: Black girls, bodies, and bias in D.C. schools.
34.
PahlkeE.HydeJ. S.AllisonC. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1042–1072.
35.
PomerantzS.RabyR.StefanikA. (2013). Girls run the world? Caught between sexism and postfeminism in school. Gender & Society, 27, 185–207.
36.
RiordanC. (1994). Single-gender schools: Outcomes for African and Hispanic Americans. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 10, 177–205.
37.
SadkerM.SadkerD. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. Touchstone.
38.
SommersC. H. (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. Simon & Schuster.
WeissK. G. (2010). Too ashamed to report: Deconstructing the shame of sexual victimization. Feminist Criminology, 5, 286–310.
41.
WilliamsJ. (2013). Thinking through the “boy crisis”: From multiple masculinities to intersectionality. In FinemanM. A.ThomsonM. (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Feminist legal theory reflections (pp. 163–176). Ashgate.
42.
WilliamsV. L. (2004). Reform or retrenchment? Single-sex education and the construction of race and gender. Wisconsin Law Review, 15, 15–79.
43.
WoodyE. L. (2003). Homophobia and heterosexism in public school reform: Constructions of gender and sexuality in California’s single gender academies. Equity & Excellence in Education, 36, 148–160.
