This study examined the negative adult characteristics and practices that prohibit connection between youth and nonparental adults. Racially/ethnically diverse youth from five community-based out-of-school-time programs participated in focus groups on youth–adult relationships. Analyses revealed that the following adult characteristics and practices prohibited connection: (a) unengaging communication styles, (b) inappropriate behavior, (c) lack of respect, (d) contradictory expectations, and (e) adult-driven approaches. Participants also reported the negative psychological consequences of these practices: (a) decreased self-esteem, (b) decreased motivation, and (c) disconnect from adults. This study provides a unique contribution to the literature on negative youth–adult interactions and has implications for training programs for adults who work with youth to improve relationships and promote positive youth outcomes.
AuerbachC.SilversteinL. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
2.
BabadE. Y.InbarJ.RosenthalR. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 459-474.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
4.
DeutschN. L.JonesJ. N. (2008). “Show me an ounce of respect”: Respect and authority in adult–youth relationships in after-school programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 667-688.
5.
DishmanR. K.McIverK. L.DowdaM.SaundersR. P.PateR. R. (2015). Motivation and behavioral regulation of physical activity in middle school students. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47, 1913-1921.
6.
DworkinJ.LarsonR. (2006). Adolescents’ negative experiences in organized youth activities. Journal of Youth Development, 1(3), 44-62.
7.
DuBoisD. L.PortilloN.RhodesJ. E.SilverthornN.ValentineJ. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57-91.
8.
Fraser-ThomasJ.CôtéJ. (2009). Understanding adolescents’ positive and negative developmental experiences in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 23, 3-23.
9.
Futch EhrlichV. A.DeutschN. L.FoxC. V.JohnsonH. E.VargaS. M. (2016). Leveraging relational assets for adolescent development: A qualitative investigation of youth–adult “connection” in positive youth development. Qualitative Psychology, 3, 59-78.
10.
GouldD.CarsonS. (2010). Coaching behaviors and developmental benefits of high school sports participation. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 7, 298-314.
11.
GreenG.RhodesJ.HirschA. H.Suárez-OrozcoC.CamicP. M. (2008). Supportive adult relationships and the academic engagement of Latin American immigrant youth. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 393-412.
12.
GreenbergerE.ChenC.BeamM. R. (1998). The role of “very important” nonparental adults in adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 321-343.
13.
HurdN. M.ZimmermanM. A.XueY. (2009). Negative adult influences and the protective effects of role models: A study with urban adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 777-789.
14.
InoueY.WegnerC. E.JordanJ. S.FunkD. C. (2015). Relationships between self-determined motivation and developmental outcomes in sport-based positive youth development. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27, 371-383.
15.
KataokaS.VandellD. L. (2013). Quality of afterschool activities and relative change in adolescent functioning over two years. Applied Developmental Science, 17, 123-134.
16.
LiangB.SpencerR.BroganD.CorralM. (2008). Mentoring relationships from early adolescence through emerging adulthood: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 168-182.
17.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1986(30), 73-84.
18.
MegaC.RonconiL.De BeniR. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 121-131.
19.
MerkelD. L. (2013). Youth sport: Positive and negative impact on young athletes. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 4, 151-160.
20.
MorrowK. V.StylesM. B. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
21.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
RhodesJ.LiangB.SpencerR. (2009). First do no harm: Ethical principles for youth mentoring relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 452-458.
23.
RhodesJ.ReddyR.RoffmanJ.GrossmanJ. B. (2005). Promoting successful youth mentoring relationships: A preliminary screening questionnaire. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 147-167.
24.
Rubie-DaviesC.HattieJ.HamiltonR. (2006). Expecting the best for students: Teacher expectations and academic outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 429-444.
25.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
26.
TylerK. M.BoelterC. M. (2008). Linking Black middle school students’ perceptions of teachers’ expectations to academic engagement and efficacy. Negro Educational Review, 59, 27-44.
27.
WongL. P. (2008). Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using NVivo. Malaysian Family Physician: The Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 3, 14-20.
