The study examined the relationship among students’ focus in urban schools and three educationally relevant psychological factors: school engagement, achievement goals, and possible future self. A 1-year study at two urban high schools with a total of 212 participants suggested that academically focused students are more highly engaged with mastery-approach goals, whereas students with a social focus had less optimal engagement and more performance goal orientations. Both academic and social focus indicated strongest relationships with academic future self and social future self, respectively.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2.
AndermanE. M.AndermanL. H.GriesingerT. (1999). The relation of present and possible academic selves during early adolescence to grade point average and achievement goals. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 3-17.
3.
AppletonJ.ChristensonS.KimD.ReschlyA. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
4.
AttewellP.HeilS.ReiselL. (2011). Competing explanation of undergraduate noncompletion. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 536-559.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BettsJ. E.AppletonJ. J.ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L.HuebnerE. S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the student engagement instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 84-93.
7.
BrownB. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In LehrerR.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 363-394). New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
EcclesJ. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78-89.
9.
ElliotA. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
10.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
11.
EstellD. B.PerdueN. H. (2013). Social support and behavioral and affective school engagement: The effects of peers, parents, and teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 325-339.
12.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
13.
GrundA.BrasslerN. K.FriesS. (2014). Torn between study and leisure: How motivational conflicts related to students’ academic and social adaption. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 242-257.
14.
HoyleR. H.SherrillM. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1673-1696.
15.
HuangC. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 23, 359-388.
16.
HuangC. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48-73.
17.
HughesJ.KwokO. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achievement readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 39-51.
18.
JonesM. H.Audley-PiotrowskiS. R.KieferS. M. (2012). Relationships among adolescents’ perceptions of friends’ behaviors, academic self-concept, and math performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 19-31.
19.
KaplanA.MaehrM. L. (1999). Enhancing the motivation of African American students: An achievement goal theory perspective. The Journal of Negro Education, 68, 23-41.
20.
LepperM. R.CorpusJ. H.IyengarS. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196.
21.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86-92.
22.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
23.
McGregorH. A.ElliotA. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381-395.
24.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM.MaehrM. L.UrdanT.AndermanL. H.. . . RoeserR. (1996). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
25.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
26.
MillerS. R. (1998). Shortcut: High school grades as a signal of human capital. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 299-311.
27.
OysermanD.BybeeD.TerryK. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 188-204.
28.
OysermanD.FrybergS. (2006). The possible selves of diverse adolescents: Content and function across gender. Race and national origin. In DunkelC.KerpelmanJ. (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research and applications (pp. 17-39). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
29.
OysermanD.MarkusH. R. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 112-125.
30.
PintrichP. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
31.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of females and males. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98-131.
32.
RyanA. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101-111.
33.
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 672-687.
34.
SchrawG.FlowerdayT.LehmanS. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 211-224.
35.
SenkoC.HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26-47.
36.
ShimS. S.RyanA. M.AndersonC. J. (2008). Achievement goals and achievement during adolescence: Examining time-varying predictor and outcome variables in growth-curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 655-671.
37.
SkinnerE. A.BelmontM. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
38.
VéronneauM.DishionT. J. (2011). Middle school friendships and academic achievement in early adolescence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 99-124.
39.
WangM.WillettJ. B.EcclesJ. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 465-480.
40.
WentzelK. R.BarryC. M.CaldwellK. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195-203.
41.
WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students’ academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 155-175.
