Perceptions of alcohol and other drug (AOD) use are associated with adolescent substance use behavior, yet research on the role of contextual factors and positive assets in this relationship is scant. This study examined the relationship between school environment and peer influence and past 30-day alcohol and marijuana use via positive future orientation and AOD perceptions in a high school sample (n = 392; 49% male; 73% White). A positive peer influence and a positive school environment were associated with lower alcohol and marijuana use via future orientation, reasoned action approach (RAA) constructs (i.e., injunctive norms, AOD expectancies, and perceived control over AOD use), and intentions to avoid AOD use. The findings provide support for the role of a positive future orientation in the prevention of AOD use among youth and point to differential paths of influence for contextual factors.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM.LoachJ.WillettsW. (1999). Different perceptions of control: Applying an extended Theory of Planned Behavior to legal and illegal drug use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 301-316.
2.
ArthurM. W.HawkinsJ. D.PollardJ. A.CatalanoR. F.BaglioniA. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities that Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575-601.
3.
BonellC. P.FletcherA.JamalF.WellsH.HardenA.MurphyS.ThomasJ. (2013). Theories of how the school environment impacts on student health: Systematic review and synthesis. Health & Place, 24, 242-249.
4.
BrechwaldW. A.PrinsteinM. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
6.
BrownS. A.ChristiansenB. A.GoldmanM. S. (1987). The Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire: An instrument for the assessment of adolescent and adult alcohol expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48, 483-491.
7.
BundickM.AndrewsM.JonesA.MarianoJ. M.BronkK. C.DamonW. (2006). Revised youth purpose survey. Unpublished instrument, Stanford Center on Adolescence, CA.
8.
CarvajalS. C.EvansR. I.NashS. G.GetzJ. G. (2002). Global positive expectancies of the self and adolescents’ substance use avoidance: Testing a social influence mediational model. Journal of Personality, 70, 421-442.
9.
ChenP.VazsonyiA. T. (2013). Future orientation, school contexts, and problem behaviors: A multilevel study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 67-81.
10.
DeweyJ. D. (1999). Reviewing the relationship between school factors and substance use for elementary, middle, and high school students. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 19, 177-225.
11.
DeWitD. J.OffordD. R.SanfordM.RyeB. J.ShainM.WrightR. (2000). The effect of school culture on adolescent behavioural problems: Self-esteem, attachment to learning, and peer approval of deviance as mediating mechanisms. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 15-38.
12.
DielmanT. E.ButchartA. T.ShopeJ. T.MillerM. (1991). Environmental correlates of adolescent substance use and misuse: Implications for prevention programs. Substance Use & Misuse, 25, 855-878.
13.
DubowE. F.ArnettM.SmithK.IppolitoM. F. (2001). Predictors of future expectations of inner-city children: A 9-month prospective study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 5-28.
14.
EnnettS. T.RingwaltC. L.ThorneJ.RohrbachL. A.VincusA.Simons-RudolphA.JonesS. (2003). A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings. Prevention Science, 4, 1-14.
15.
FergussonD. M.Swain-CampbellN. R.HorwoodL. J. (2002). Deviant peer affiliations, crime, and substance use: A fixed effects regression analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 419-430.
16.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Prediction and change of behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
17.
GeorgeL. S.ParkC. L. (2013). Are meaning and purpose distinct? An examination of correlates and predictors. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 365-375.
18.
GibbsB. G.EricksonL. D.DufurM. J.MilesA. (2015). Extracurricular associations and college enrollment. Social Science Research, 50, 367-381.
19.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
20.
IsraelashviliM. (1997). School adjustment, school membership and adolescents’ future expectations. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 525-535.
21.
JacobusJ.TapertS. F. (2013). Neurotoxic effects of alcohol in adolescence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 703-721.
22.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.MiechR. A.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2015). Monitoring the future national results on drug use: 1975-2013: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
KeoughK. A.ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149-164.
25.
KiuruN.AunolaK.VuoriJ.NurmiJ. E. (2007). The role of peer groups in adolescents’ educational expectations and adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 995-1009.
26.
LachmanM. E.WeaverS. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 763-773.
27.
MalmbergM.OverbeekG.VermulstA. A.MonshouwerK.VolleberghW. A. M.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2012). The theory of planned behavior: Precursors of marijuana use in early adolescence?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123, 22-28.
28.
MarcouxB. C.ShopeJ. T. (1997). Application of the theory of planned behavior to adolescent use and misuse of alcohol. Health Education Research, 12, 323-331.
29.
MarkhamW. A. (2015). School culture and teenage substance use: A conceptual and operational framework. Educational Review, 67, 282-299.
30.
McKnightP. E.KashdanT. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13, 242-251.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
33.
NurmiJ. E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1-59.
34.
OysermanD.TerryK.BybeeD. (2002). A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 313-326.
35.
PetraitisJ.FlayB. R.MillerT. Q. (1995). Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organizing pieces in the puzzle. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 67-86.
36.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.WinfreeL. T.MadensenT. D.DaigleL. E.. . . GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765-802.
37.
ResnickM. D.BearmanP. S.BlumR. W.BaumanK. E.HarrisK. M.JonesJ.. . . UdryJ. R. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823-832.
38.
RobbinsR. N.BryanA. (2004). Relationships between future orientation, impulsive sensation seeking, and risk behavior among adjudicated adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 428-445.
39.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
40.
ScalesP. C.LeffertN. (1999). Developmental assets: A synthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
41.
Simons-MortonB.ChenR. S. (2006). Over time relationships between early adolescent and peer substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1211-1223.
42.
SnyderC. R.HozaB.PelhamW. E.RapoffM.WareL.DanovskyM.. . . StahlK. J. (1997). The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 399-421.
43.
StacyA. W.NewcombM. D.BentlerP. M. (1992). Interactive and higher-order effects of social influences on drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 226-241.
44.
StoddardS. A.ZimmermanM. A.BauermeisterJ. A. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of cumulative risks, cumulative promotive factors, and adolescent violent behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 542-555.
45.
ValleM. F.HuebnerE. S.SuldoS. M. (2004). Further evaluation of the Children’s Hope Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 320-337.
46.
VogelM.ReesC. E.McCuddyT.CarsonD. C. (2015). The highs that bind: School context, social status and marijuana use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1153-1164.
47.
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48.
WoodM. D.ReadJ. P.PalfaiT. P.StevensonJ. F. (2001). Social influence processes and college student drinking: The mediational role of alcohol outcome expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 62, 32-43.
49.
WymanP. A.CowenE. L.WorkW. C.KerleyJ. H. (1993). The role of children’s future expectations in self-system functioning and adjustment to life stress: A prospective study of urban at-risk children. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 649-661.
50.
YeagerD. S.BundickM. J. (2009). The role of purposeful work goals in promoting meaning in life and in schoolwork during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 423-452.
51.
YuanK.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In BeckerM. P. (Ed.), Sociological methodology 2000 (pp. 165-200). Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
52.
ZimmermanM.ReischlT.MillerA.StoddardS. (2011). Youth empowerment solutions measurement tool. Unpublished instrument, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
