Through a cross-sectional design, this study examines whether practices of active
participation (AP; that is, opportunities for decision making and leadership)
and quality of relationships (QR) established between members of youth
organizations (i.e., affective and instrumental support) relate to dimensions of
youth’s identity (i.e., personal purpose, personal meaning) and sense of
sociopolitical control (i.e., leadership, political efficacy). Participants
(n = 347; 17-26 years) were drawn from 38 youth
organizations in two regions of Chile. Results from multiple regression models
controlling for demographics, length of involvement, and aim of the organization
yielded significant interactions between QR and practices of AP on both
indicators of identity and political efficacy. Only length of involvement in the
organization was related to leadership outcomes. Findings highlight the powerful
effects of the quality of the relational context of youth programs and
organizations to actualize the benefits of AP.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1996). Multiple regression: Testing and
interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
2.
BrandtstädterJ. (1999). The self in action and
development. In BrandtstädterJ.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research
through the lifespan (pp. 37-65).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
3.
BrandtstadterJ.LernerR. M. (1999). Action and self-development: Theory
and research through the lifespan. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
4.
CaminoL.ZeldinS. (2002). From periphery to center:
Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of
communities. Applied Developmental Science,
6, 213-220.
5.
CaminoL.ZeldinS.MookC.O’ConnorC. (2004). Youth and adult leaders for program
excellence: A practical guide for program assessment and action
planning. Madison:
University of
Wisconsin–Extension.
6.
CastilloJ. C.MirandaD.BonhommeM.CoxC.BascopéM. (2014). Mitigating the political
participation gap from the school: The roles of civic knowledge and
classroom climate. Journal of Youth
Studies, 18,
16-35.
7.
ChristensB. D.SpeerP. W. (2011). Contextual influences on
participation in community organizing: A multilevel longitudinal
study. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 47,
253-263.
8.
CôtéJ. E.SchwartzS. J. (2002). Comparing psychological and
sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and
the individualization process. Journal of
Adolescence, 25,
571-586.
9.
DamonW.MenonJ.BronkK. C. (2003). The development of purpose
during adolescence. Applied Developmental
Science, 7,
119-128.
10.
DiemerM. A.MistryR. S.WadsworthM. E.LópezI.ReimersF. (2013). Best practices in
conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological
research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public
Policy, 13,
77-113.
11.
EcclesJ. S. (2005). The present and future of
research on activity settings as developmental contexts. In
MahoneyJ. L.LarsonR. W.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development:
Extracurricular activities, after school and community programs
(pp. 353-371). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
12.
EkmanJ.AmnåE. (2012). Political participation and
civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human
Affairs, 22,
283-300. doi:10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
13.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and
crisis. Oxford, UK: W.W.
Norton.
14.
FlanaganC.LevineP. (2010). Civic engagement and the
transition to adulthood. Future of
Children, 20,
159-179.
15.
FlanaganC. A.MartínezM. L.CumsilleP.NgomaneT. (2011). Youth civic development:
Theorizing a domain with evidence from different cultural
contexts. New Directions for Child and Adolescent
Development, 2011(134),
95-109.
16.
GallimoreR.GoldenbergC. N.WeisnerT. S. (1993). The social construction and
subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community
psychology. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 21,
537-560.
17.
GamboneM. A.YuH. C.Lewis-CharpH.SipeC. L.LacoeJ. (2006). Youth organizing,
identity-support, and youth development agencies as avenues for
involvement. Journal of Community Practice,
14(1-2),
235-253.
18.
GrossmanJ. B.RhodesJ. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors
and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships.
American Journal of Community Psychology,
30, 199-219.
19.
HamiltonS. F.HamiltonM. A.HirschB. J.HughesJ.KingJ.MatonK. (2006). Community contexts for
mentoring. Journal of Community Psychology,
34, 727-746.
20.
HansenD. M.LarsonR. W. (2007). Amplifiers of developmental
and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation, lead
roles, and adult-youth ratios. Journal of Applied
Developmental Psychology, 28,
360-374.
21.
HansenD. M.LarsonR. W.DworkinJ. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in
organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental
experiences. Journal of Research on
Adolescence, 13,
25-55.
22.
HartR. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From
tokenism to citizenship. Florence,
Italy:
UNICEF.
23.
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. (2010).
Compendio estadístico informe de ruralidad en
Chile [Statistical report of
rurality in Chile]. Santiago,
Chile: Ministerio de Desarrollo
Social.
JarrettR. L.SullivanP. J.WatkinsN. D. (2005). Developing social capital
through participation in organized youth programs: Qualitative insights from
three programs. Journal of Community
Psychology, 33,
41-55.
26.
KirshnerB. (2007). Youth activism as a context
for learning and development. American Behavioral
Scientist, 51,
367-379.
27.
KirshnerB. (2008). Guided participation in
three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint
work. Journal of the Learning Sciences,
17, 60-101.
28.
KirshnerB. (2009). “Power in numbers”: Youth
organizing as a context for exploring civic identity.
Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19,
414-440.
29.
LarsonR. (2006). Positive youth development,
willful adolescents, and mentoring. Journal of
Community Psychology, 34,
677-689.
30.
LarsonR.HansenD. (2005). The development of strategic
thinking: Learning to impact human systems in a youth activism
program. Human Development,
48, 327-349.
31.
LarsonR. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of
positive youth development. The American
Psychologist, 55,
170-183.
32.
LarsonR. W.AngusR. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of
skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think
strategically. Child Development,
82, 277-294. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01555.x
33.
MartínezM. L.CumsilleP. (2010). Gender differences in civic
involvement and political attitudes in Chilean adolescents.
In IttelA.MerkensH.StecherL.ZinneckerJ. (Eds.), Jahrbuch jugendforschung (pp.
55-83). Wiesbaden,
Germany:
Springer.
34.
MartínezM. L.PeñalozaP.ValenzuelaC. (2012). Civic commitment in young
activists: Emergent processes in the development of personal and collective
identity. Journal of Adolescence,
35, 474-484.
35.
MartínezM. L.SilvaC.CarmonaM.CumsilleP. (2012). Young Chileans’ views of
citizenship: Findings from the first generation born after the reinstitution
of democracy. Applied Developmental
Science, 16(4),
167-180.
36.
MartínezM. L.SilvaC.HernándezA. C. (2010). ¿En qué ciudadanía creen los
jóvenes? Creencias, aspiraciones de ciudadanía y motivaciones para la
participación sociopolítica [What
type of citizenship do youth believe in? Beliefs, aspirations, and
motivations for sociopolitical participation].
Psykhe, 19(2),
25-37.
37.
O’DonoghueJ. L.StrobelK. R. (2007). Directivity and freedom:
Adult support of activism among urban youth.
American Behavioral Scientist, 51,
465-485. doi:10.1177/0002764207306071
38.
PearceN. J.LarsonR. W. (2006). How teens become engaged in
youth development programs: The process of motivational change in a civic
activism organization. Applied Developmental
Science, 10,
121-131.
39.
PerkinsD. D.ZimmermanM. A. (1995). Empowerment theory,
research, and application. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 23,
569-579.
40.
PetersonN. A.PetersonC. H.AgreL.ChristensB. D.MortonC. M. (2011). Measuring youth empowerment:
Validation of a sociopolitical control scale for youth in an urban community
context. Journal of Community Psychology,
39, 592-605.
41.
RhodesJ. E.DuBoisD. L. (2006). Understanding and
facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social
Policy Report: The Society for Research in Child Development,
20(3), 3.
42.
RhodesJ.ReddyR.RoffmanJ.GrossmanJ. B. (2005). Promoting successful youth
mentoring relationships: A preliminary screening
questionnaire. The Journal of Primary
Prevention, 26,
147-167.
43.
RussellS. T.MuracoA.SubramaniamA.LaubC. (2009). Youth empowerment and high
school gay-straight alliances. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 38,
891-903. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9382-8
44.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory
and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and
well-being. American Psychologist,
55(1),
68-78.
45.
SchulzW.AinleyJ.FraillonJ.KerrD.LositoB. (2010). ICCS 2009 international report:
Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school
students in 38 countries. Amsterdam, the
Netherlands:
IEA.
46.
SerafiniT. E.AdamsG. R. (2002). Functions of identity: Scale
construction and validation. Identity: An
International Journal of Theory and Research, 2,
361-389.
47.
SharpE. H.CoatsworthJ. D.DarlingN.CumsilleP.RanieriS. (2007). Gender differences in the
self-defining activities and identity experiences of adolescents and
emerging adults. Journal of Adolescence,
30, 251-269.
48.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate
statistics (5th ed.). Boston,
MA: Allyn &
Bacon.
49.
WattsR. J.WilliamsN. C.JagersR. J. (2003). Sociopolitical
development. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 31,
185-194.
50.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). What kind of citizen? The
politics of educating for democracy. American
Educational Research Journal, 41,
237-269.
51.
WongN.ZimmermanM.ParkerE. (2010). A typology of youth
participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health
promotion. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 46(1),
100-114. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0
52.
ZarzuriR. (2010). Tensiones y desafíos en la
participación política juvenil en Chile [Tensions and challenges in youth political participation in
Chile]. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana,
15(50),
103-115.
53.
ZeldinS. (2004). Youth as agents of adult and
community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged
in organizational governance. Applied Developmental
Science, 8,
75-90.
54.
ZeldinS.CaminoL.CalvertM. (2007). Toward an understanding of
youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research
directions. Análise Psicológica,
25(1),
77-95.
55.
ZeldinS.ChristensB. D.PowersJ. L. (2013). The psychology and practice
of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and
community change. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 51,
385-397.
56.
ZeldinS.LarsonR.CaminoL.O’ConnorC. (2005). Intergenerational
relationships and partnerships in community programs: Purpose, practice, and
directions for research. Journal of Community
Psychology, 33,
1-10.
57.
ZimmermanM. A. (2000). Empowerment theory:
Psychological, organizational, and community levels of
analysis. In RappaportJ.SeidmanE. (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63).
New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
58.
ZimmermanM. A.IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.CheckowayB. (1992). Further explorations in
empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological
empowerment. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 20,
707-727.
59.
ZimmermanM. A.ZahniserJ. H. (1991). Refinements of
sphere-specific measures of perceived control: Development of a
sociopolitical control scale. Journal of Community
Psychology, 19,
189-204.
60.
ZukinC.KeeterS.AndolinaM.JenkinsK.CarpiniM. X. D. (2006). A new engagement? Political
participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Press.
