The research presented uses intersectionality theory as a lens to study the racial identity construction of four African American young adolescent girls. The findings suggest that race was largely situated in a Black–White discourse for the girls in the study. When limited information was provided in home, school, and community settings, the participants made meaning from dominant discourses about race and identity, although glimpses of critical thinking about race did occur. In conclusion, the potential of including youth identity within intersectionality theory to broaden the utility of the theory itself and also for making meaning of and advocating for marginalized adolescents is discussed.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
BeaneJ. A. (2005). Foreword. In BrownE. R.SaltmanK. J. (Eds.), The critical middle school reader (pp. xi-xv). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BettieJ. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BlakeJ.ButlerB.LewisC.DarensbourgA. (2011). Unmasking the inequitable discipline experiences of urban Black girls: Implications for urban educational stakeholders. Urban Review, 43, 90-106.
5.
BrownE. R. (2005). Introduction. In BrownE. R.SaltmanK. J. (Eds.), The critical middle school reader (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BrownE. R. (2010). A critical perspective on human development: Implications for adolescence, classroom practice, and middle school policy. In LeeK.VagleM. D. (Eds.), Developmentalism in early childhood and middle grades education (pp. 183-208). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
ClarkC. D. (1999). The auto driven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children’s experiences. Visual Sociology, 14, 39-50.
9.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
10.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum,140, 139-167.
12.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1279.
13.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1903). The souls of black folk. New York, NY: Bantam Classic.
14.
Evans-WintersV. E.EspositoJ. (2010). Other people’s daughters: Critical race feminism and Black girls’ education. Educational Foundations, 24, 11-24.
15.
FergusonA. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
FordhamS. (1993). “Those loud Black girls”: (Black) women, silence, and gender “passing” in the academy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24, 3-32.
17.
GarrisonJ. (2008). A problematic alliance: Colonial anthropology, recapitulation theory, and G. Stanley Hall’s program for the Liberation of America’s Youth. American Educational History Journal, 35, 131-147.
18.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
GottschildB. (2003). The Black dancing body: A geography from coon to cool/Brenda Dixon Gottschild. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GrantL. (1984). Black girls’ “place” in desegregated classrooms. Sociology of Education, 57, 98-111.
21.
HallH. R.SmithE. L. (2012). “This is not reality. It’s only TV”: African American girls respond to media (mis)representations. The New Educator, 8, 222-242.
22.
HancockA. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 63-79.
23.
hooksb. (1984). From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
24.
HulkoW. (2009). The time- and context-contingent nature of intersectionality and interlocking oppressions. Journal of Women and Social Work, 24, 44-55.
25.
LeskoN. (1996). Denaturalizing adolescence: The politics of contemporary representation. Youth & Society, 28, 139-161.
26.
LeskoN. (2001). Act your age: A cultural construction of adolescence. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
27.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771-1800.
29.
MorrisE. W. (2007). “Ladies” or “Loudies?” Perceptions and experiences of Black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38, 490-515.
30.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
RollockN. (2007). Why Black girls don’t matter: Exploring how race and gender shape academic success in an inner city school. Support For Learning, 22, 197-202.
32.
SaltmanK. J. (2005). The social construction of adolescence. In BrownE. R.SaltmanK. J. (Eds.), The critical middle school reader (pp. 15-20). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
ShieldsS. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301-311.
34.
SolorzanoD. G.YossoT. J. (2001). From racial stereotyping and deficit discourse toward a critical race theory in teacher education. Multicultural Education, 9, 2-8.
35.
SpelmanE. V. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston, MA: Beacon.
36.
WayN. (1995). “Can’t you see the courage, the strength that I have?” Listening to urban adolescent girls speak about their relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 107-128.
