We examined how family communication patterns (FCPs) are associated with frequency of adolescent–parent communication in person, over the phone, via text message, and via email. Adolescents (N = 195) aged 13 to 18 completed an online survey assessing FCPs and frequency of communication methods used with parents. The results revealed that both frequency and method of communication differed by general FCPs; adolescents in higher conformity families reported less frequent text messaging with mothers than adolescents in lower conformity families, and adolescents in higher conversation families (mothers only) and lower conformity families reported more frequent email communication with parents. Results set the stage for future research to further explore the processes and outcomes of adolescent–parent communication through communication technology.
AvtgisT. A. (1999). The relationship between unwillingness to communicate and family communication patterns. Communication Research Reports, 16, 333-338. doi:10.1080/08824099909388734
2.
BarbatoC. A.GrahamE. E.PerseE. M. (2003). Communicating in the family: An examination of the relationship of family communication climate and interpersonal communication motives. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 123-148. doi:10.1207/S15327698JFC0303_01
3.
ChangC.HeoJ. (2014). Visiting theories that predict college students’ self-disclosure on Facebook. Computer in Human Behavior, 30, 479-486. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.059
4.
ConnellJ. H.DworkinJ. (2012). College students’ information and communications technology (ICT) use with parents. Association of Higher Education Parent/Family Program Professionals Journal, 2(2), 2-17.
5.
FitzpatrickM. A. (2004). Family communication patterns theory: Observations on its development and application. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 167-179. doi:10.1080/15267431.2004.9670129
6.
FitzpatrickM. A.RitchieL. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 275-301.
7.
HuangL. (1999). Family communication patterns and personality characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 230-243. doi:10.1080/01463379909370136
8.
JinB.ParkN. (2010). In-person contact begets calling and texting: Interpersonal motives for cell phone use, face-to-face interaction, and loneliness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 611-618. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0314
9.
KatzE.BlumlerJ.GurevitchM. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In BlumlerJ.KatzE. (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-34). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
KoernerA. F.CvancaraK. E. (2002). The influence of conformity orientation on communication patterns in family conversations. Journal of Family Communication, 2, 133-152. doi:10.1207/S15327698JFC0203_2
11.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48, 59-75. doi:10.1080/10510979709368491
12.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (2002a). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12, 70-91.
13.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (2002b). You never leave your family in a fight: The impact of family of origin on conflict-behavior in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 53, 234-251. doi:10.1080/10510970209388588
14.
KoernerA. F.FitzpatrickM. A. (2004). Family conflict communication. In VangelistiA. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 159-183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
KoestenJ. (2004). Family communication patterns, sex of subject, and communication competence. Communication Monographs, 71, 226-244. doi:10.1080/0363775052000343417
16.
KwonM.D’AngeloJ.McLeodD. M. (2013). Facebook use and social capital: To bond, to bridge, or to escape. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33, 35-43. doi:10.1177/0270467613496767
MartinS. P.RobinsonJ. P. (2007). The income digital divide: Trends and predictions for levels of Internet use. Social Problems, 54(1), 1-22. doi:10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.1
20.
McLeodJ. M.ChaffeeS. H. (1972). The construction of social reality. In TedeschiJ. (Ed.), The social influence process (pp. 50-99). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
21.
NasahA.DaCostaB.KinsellC.SeokS. (2010). The digital literacy debate: An investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58, 531-555. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9151-8
22.
RitchieL. D.FitzpatrickM. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523-544. doi:10.1177/009365090017004007
23.
RudiJ. H.DworkinJ.WalkerS. K.DotyJ. (2015). Parents’ use of information and communications technology for family communication: Differences by age of children. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1). doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.934390
24.
SchrodtP.LedbetterA. M.OhrtJ. K. (2007). Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children’s mental well-being. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 23-46. doi:10.1080/15267430709336667
25.
SchrodtP.WittP. L.MessersmithA. S. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75, 248-269. doi:10.1080/03637750802256318
26.
SillarsA.KoernerA.FitzpatrickM. A. (2005). Communication and understanding in parent–adolescent relationships. Human Communication Research, 31, 102-128.
27.
SteinbergL. (2001). We know some things: Parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11, 1-19.
28.
SteinbergL.SilkJ. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In BorensteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting (2nd ed., Vol. I, pp. 103-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
