This article reports on a qualitative study of youth interviews representing different types of other-oriented purpose. In order to better understand youth contribution, differences in the directness of responses to community needs were examined in youth who demonstrated other-oriented purpose. Implicit theories about the world and other people were investigated as potential determinants of these different types. First, results supported a relation between incremental world theories and indirect-response other-oriented purposes. Second, results showed that participants with direct-response other-oriented purposes displayed evidence of either entity or incremental theories. Agency and compassion are suggested as explanations for why implicit theories functioned differently between the identified types of other-oriented purpose.
BlackwellL. S.Trzesniewski DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
3.
BronkK. C. (2011, Winter). The role of purpose in life in healthy identity formation: A grounded model. New Directions for Youth Development, (132). doi:10.1002/yd.426.
4.
BurrowA. L.HillP. L. (2011). Purpose as a form of identity capital for positive youth adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1196-1206. doi:10.1037/a0023818.
5.
ChiuC.DweckC. S.TongJ. Y.FuJ. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923-940. doi:10.1037/0022 3514.73.5.923.
6.
DamonW. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York, NY: Free Press.
7.
DamonW.MenonJ. L.BronkK. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119-128. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_2
8.
DweckC. (1996). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. In GollwitzerP. M.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 69-90). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
10.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.-y.HongY-y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
11.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
12.
ErdleyC. A.DweckC. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64, 863-878. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02948.x
13.
HeymanG. D.DweckC. S. (1998). Children’s thinking about traits: Implications for judgments about the self and others. Child Development, 64, 391-403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06197.x
14.
KarafantisD. M.LevyS. R. (2004). The role of children’s lay theories about the malleability of human attributes in beliefs about and volunteering for disadvantaged groups. Child Development, 75, 236-250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00666.x
15.
LernerR. M.DowlingE. M.AndersonP. M. (2003). Positive youth development: Thriving as the basis of personhood and civil society. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 172-180. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_8
16.
MalinH.ReillyT. S.YeagerD.MoranS.AndrewsM.BundickM.DamonW. (2008, October). Youth purpose project interview coding process for forms of purpose determination. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
MoranS. (2009). Purpose: Giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence. High Ability Studies, 20, 143-159. doi:10.1080/13598130903358501
18.
NasirN. S.KirshnerB. (2003). The cultural construction of moral and civic identities. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 138-147. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_4
19.
SherrodL. R.SpiewakG. R. (2008). Possible interrelationships between civic engagement, positive youth development, and spirituality/religiosity. In LernerR. M.RoeserR. W.PhelpsE. (Eds.), Positive youth development and spirituality: From theory to research (pp. 322-338). West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
20.
TempletonJ. L.EcclesJ. S. (2008). Spirituality, “Expanding Circle Morality,” and positive youth development. In LernerR. M.RoeserR. W.PhelpsE. (Eds.), Positive youth development and spirituality: From theory to research (pp. 197-209). West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
21.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 237-269. doi:10.3102/00028312041002237
22.
YeagerD.BundickM. (2009). The role of purposeful work goals in promoting meaning in life and in schoolwork during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 423-452. doi:10.1177/0743558409336749
23.
YounissJ.YatesM. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
YounissJ.McLellanJ. A.YatesM. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 620-631. doi:10.1177/0002764297040005008
