Using a nationally representative sample of 3,058 junior high school students in Taiwan, this study examines a model of how personal traits, family factors, and school dynamics influence school violence committed by students against students and teachers. This model proposed that school violence is directly influenced by personal traits, victimization, and parental monitoring as well as indirectly influenced by personal traits, victimization, and parental monitoring mediated through school engagement, risky peers, and student–teacher relationship. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the theoretical model. The model showed a good fit for the sample as a whole. Similar findings were also found between male and female students. Overall findings suggested that negative personal traits, victimization, and parental monitoring have direct influence on school violence as well as indirect influence mediated through school variables. Implications for theory, policy and practice, and recommendation for future research are discussed.
AhmedE.BraithwaiteV. (2004). Bullying and victimization: Cause for concern for both families and schools. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 35-54.
2.
AkibaM.LeTendreG. K.BakerD. P.GoeslingB. (2002). Student victimization: National and school system effects on school violence in 37 nations. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 829-853.
3.
AndoM.AsakuraT.Simons-MortonB. (2005). Psychosocial influence on physical, verbal, and indirect bullying among Japanese Early Adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 268-297.
4.
AstorR. A.BenbenishtyR.PitnerR.ZeiraA. (2004). Bullying and peer victimization in schools. In MearesP. A.FraserM. W. (Eds.), Intervention with children and adolescents: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 471-448). Boston: Pearson.
5.
AstorR. A.BenbenishtyR.VinokurA.ZeiraA. (2006). Arab and Jewish elementary school students’ perceptions of fear and school violence: Understanding the influence of school context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 91-118.
6.
AstorR. A.BenbenishtyR.ZeiraA.VinokurA. (2002). School climate, observed risky behaviors, and victimization as predictors of high school students’ fear and judgments of school violence as a problem. Health Education and Behavior, 29, 716-736.
7.
AstorR. A.MeyerH. A.BenbenishtyR.MarachiR.RosemondM. (2005). School safety interventions: Best practices and programs. Children & Schools, 24, 17-32.
8.
BaldryA. C. (2003). Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 713-732.
9.
BaldryA. C.FarringtonD. P. (2000). Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 17-31.
10.
BenbenishyR.AstorR. A. (2005). School violence in context: Cultural, neighborhood, family, school, and gender. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BenbenishtyR.AstorR. A.ZeiraA.VinokurA. (2002). Perceptions of violence and fear of school attendance among junior high school students’ in Israel. Social Work Research, 26(2), 71-88.
12.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
13.
BentlerP. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
14.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
15.
BollenK. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 303-316.
16.
BosworthK.EspelageD. L.SimonT. R. (1999). Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 341-362.
17.
ByrneB. (1994). Bullies and victims in a school setting with reference to some Dublin schools. Irish Journal of Psychology, 15, 574-586.
18.
ChenJ. K.AstorR. A. (2009a). Students’ reports of violence against teachers in Taiwanese schools. Journal of School Violence, 8, 1-16.
19.
ChenJ. K.AstorR. A. (2009b). The perpetration of school violence in Taiwan: An analysis of gender, grade level, school type. School Psychology International, 30(6), 568-584.
20.
ChenJ. K.AstorR. A. (2010). School violence perpetration in Taiwan: Examining how western risk factors predict school violence in an Asian culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(8), 1388-1410.
21.
ChenL. H. (1989). Guo Zhong Xiao Yuan Xue Sheng Bao Xing Zhi Yan Jiu [School violence in Taiwanese junior high schools]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Cheng-Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
22.
ChenL. H. (1999). Guo Zhong Xiao Yuan Bao Xing Jiao Shi Bei Hai Zhi Yan Jiu [Teacher victimization in Taiwanese junior high schools]. Proceedings of Taiwanese Symposium on Social Problems, Taiwan National Science Council, 1, 493-526.
23.
ConnollyI.O’MooreM. (2003). Personality and family relation of children who bully. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 559-567.
24.
FlanneryD.WesterK.SingerM. (2004). Impact of Exposure to Violence in School on Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Behavior. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 559-573.
25.
HaynieD. L.NanselT.EitelP.CrumpA. D.SaylorK.YuK.. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.
26.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
27.
HuS. C.LinK. S. (2001). Xiao Yuan Bao Li Sheng Xing Lv Ji Wei Xian Yin Zi Yan Jiu: Yi Tainan Shi Guo Zhong Wei Li [Prevalence and risk factors of school violence: A survey from junior high school students in Tainan]. Xue Xiao Wei Sheng, 38, 32-55.
28.
HuangF. Y.HsienW. Y. (1987). Xiao Yuan Bao Xing Zhi Cheng Yin Yu Fang Zhi Dui Ce. [Risk factors and intervention for school violence]. Journal of Youth Delinquency, 5, 155-198.
29.
HuttunenA.SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK. (1996). Friendship networks and bullying in schools. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 794, 355-359.
30.
JangS. J. (2002). Race, ethnicity, and deviance: A study of Asian and non-Asian Adolescents in America. Sociological Forum, 17, 647-680.
31.
Junger-TasJ. (1999). The Netherlands. In SmithP. K.MoritaY.Junger-TasJ.OlweusD.CatalanoR.SleeP. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 205-223). London: Routledge.
32.
Khoury-KassabriM.AstorR. A.BenbenishtyR. (2009). Middle Eastern adolescents’ perpetration of school violence against peers and teachers: A cross cultural and ecological analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(1), 159-182.
33.
Lin. (1986). Guo Zhong Xiao Yuan Bao Xing Zhi Yan Jiu: Taipei shi shi zheng fen zi. [Student violent behavior in junior high school: Empirical evidence in Taipei]. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Central Police College, Taipei, Taiwan.
34.
MaH. K.ShekD. T. L.CheungP. C.TamK. K. (2002). A longitudinal study of peer and teacher influences on prosocial and antisocial behavior of Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Social Behavior & Personality, 30, 157-168.
35.
McConvilleD. W.CornellD. G. (2003). Aggressive attitudes predict aggressive behavior in middle school students. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 11, 179-187.
36.
NanselT. R.OverpeckM.PillaR. S.RuanW. J.Simons-MortonB.ScheidtP. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100.
37.
NatvigG. K.AlbrektsenG.QvarnstromU. (2001). School-related stress experience as a risk factor for bullying behavior. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 30, 561-575.
38.
NisbettR. E. (2003). The geography of though: How Asian and Westerners think differently. . . and why. New York: Free Press.
39.
OlweusD. (1999). Norway. In SmithP. K.MoritaY.Junger-TasJ.OlweusD.CatalanoR.SleeP. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 28-48). New York: Routledge.
40.
PapaliaD. E.OldsS. W.FeldmanR. D. (2009). Human development (11th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
41.
RigbyK. (1993). School children’s perception of their families and parents as a function of peer relations. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 501-513.
42.
RigbyK. (1994). Psychosocial functioning in the families of Australian adolescent schoolchildren involved in bully/victims problems. Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 173-187.
43.
SleeP. T. (1995). Bullying in the playground: The impact of interpersonal violence on Australian children’s perceptions of their play environment. Children’sEnvironments, 12, 273-282.
44.
SleeP. T.RigbyK. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck’s personality factors and self-esteem to bully/victim behaviour in Australian school boys. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 271-373.
45.
Taiwan Minister of Education. (2006). Education in Taiwan, 2006. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
46.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47.
WongD. S. W. (2004). School Bullying and Tackling Strategies in Hong Kong. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 537-553.
48.
WuJ.LeeK. C.YinM. J.HuS. Z. (2000). Taiwan Di Qu Qing Shao Nian Xiao Yuan Bao Li Fang Zhi Ji Hua [Prevention and Control of School Violence in Taiwan] (NSC 89-2420-H-006-001-QBS). Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council.
49.
YoneyamaS.NaitoA. (2003). Problems with the Paradigm: The school as a factor in understanding bullying (with special reference to Japan). British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24, 315-330.
