Youth policy is more than a mere response to the actual behavior of children, but it is equally influenced by values and beliefs of policy makers. These values are however rarely made explicit and, therefore, the authors refer to them as “the hidden curriculum” of youth policy. The study investigation explicates this hidden curriculum by empirically analyzing policy reports and interviews with policy makers. The study design is based on an existing theory on the content and structure of values. The results show that Dutch youth policy is most dominantly guided by security values. The results also show that there are differences between the social groups the policy measures target. Policy measures regarding “normal” families are becoming increasingly empowering, for example, by putting an emphasis on the competencies of parents. For families at risk, however, the focus is on control over these families by both professionals and citizens.
BloorM. (1997). Techniques of Validation in qualitative research. In MillerG.DingwallR. (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 37-51). London: SAGE.
2.
BoeijeH. (2010). Qualitative data analysis: Thinking and doing: SAGE.
3.
BurrisS. (2000). Surveillance, social risk, and symbolism: Framing the analysis for research and policy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 25(Suppl. 2), 120-127.
4.
CouseeF.RoetsG.De BieM. (2009). Empowering the powerful: Challenging hidden processes of marginalization in youth work policy and practice in Belgium. Critical Social Policy, 29, 421-442.
5.
DarlingN.SteinbergL. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
6.
DaviesH. T. O.NutleyS. M.SmithP. C. (2000). Introducing evidence-based policy and practice in public services. In DaviesH. T. O.NutleyS. M.SmithP. C. (Eds.), What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services (pp. 1-12). Bristol, UK: University of Bristol.
7.
De RegtA.BrinkgreveC. (2000). De verborgen agenda voor sociale plaatsing. Opvoeding in de jaren negentig [The hidden agenda of social placement]. In ZandeI. v. d. (Ed.), Deugt de jeugd? Normen en waarden in gezin, school en politiek [Is youth a bad lot? Norms and values in family, school and politics.] (pp. 11-25). Maarssen, Netherlands: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom.
8.
DevereuxE. C.BronfenbrennerU.RodgersR. R. (1969). Child-rearing in England and the United States: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 31(2), 257-270.
9.
DevosT.SpiniD.SchwartzS. H. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 481-494.
10.
DonzelotJ. (1979). The policing of families. New York, NY: Pantheon.
11.
DuyvendakJ. W.KnijnT.KremerM. (2006). Policy, people and the new professional. An introduction. In DuyvendakJ. W.KnijnT.KremerM. (Eds.), Policy, people and the new professional (pp.7-16). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
12.
EdelA. (1979). Analyzing concepts in social sciences: Science, ideology and value (Vol. 1). New Brunswick, NJ: ransaction Books.
13.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
FoucaultM. (1981). Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
15.
FurlongA.CartmelF. (1997). Young people and social change. Individualization and risk in late modernity. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16.
HolstiO. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
MartinJ. (1983). What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one? In GirouxH. A.PurpelD. (Eds.), The hidden curriculum and moral education (pp. 122-142). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
18.
Maynard-MoodyS.StullD. D. (1987). The symbolic of policy analysis: Interpreting policy change in a health department. In FischerF.ForesterJ. (Eds.), Confronting values in policy analysis. The politics of criteria (pp. 248-265). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
19.
Ministerie voor Jeugd en Gezin. (2007a). Alle Kansen voor Alle Kinderen [Every Opportunity for Every Child]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Author.
20.
Ministerie voor Jeugd en Gezin. (2007b). Kinderen Veilig Thuis [Children Save at Home]: Den Haag, Netherlands: Author.
21.
Ministerie voor Jeugd en Gezin. (2008). De Kracht van het Gezin [Strength of the Family]: Den Haag, Netherlands: Author.
MunroE. (1999). Protecting children in an anxious society. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 117-127.
27.
MunroE. (2004). State regulation of parenting. The Political Quarterly, 75(2), 180-184.
28.
PartonN. (1994). “Problematics of government”: (Post)modernity and social work. British Journal of Social Work, 24(1), 9-32.
29.
RigbyE.TarrantK.NeumanM. J. (2007). Alternative policy designs and the socio-political construction of childcare. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 98-108.
30.
RobsonC. (2002). Real world research (Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Collier MacMillan.
32.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
33.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in content and structure of values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
34.
SchwartzS. H.SagieG. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 465-497.
35.
TilburyC. (2004). The influence of performance measurement on child welfare policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 225-241.
36.
TimmermanG. (2009). Youth policy and participation. An analysis of pedagogical ideals in municipal youth policy in the Netherlands. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 572-576.
37.
Van EijckS. R. A. (2006). Sturingsadvies Deel 1: Koersen op het Kind [Recommendations for Structuring, Part 1: Setting course for children]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Projectburo Operatie Jong.
