Substance use and delinquency in Thai adolescents are growing public health concerns. Research has linked neighborhood characteristics to these outcomes, with explanations focused on neighborhood disorganization, social cohesion, and social control. This study examines the independent associations of these neighborhood constructs with Thai adolescents’ substance use and delinquency, through peer deviance, to determine which neighborhood aspects are particularly important. Families (N = 420) with adolescents aged 13 to 14 were randomly selected from 7 districts in Bangkok, Thailand. Structural equation modeling showed that adolescents’, but not parents’, perceptions of greater disorganization were related to increased rates of both minor and serious delinquency. Surprisingly, greater neighborhood cohesion was related to greater minor delinquency. Peer deviance was unrelated to neighborhood variables. Findings can inform prevention strategies for Thai adolescents, as results suggest that neighborhoods are important for adolescent behaviors regardless of culture. Further work should help communities make use of social cohesion to benefit residents.
AssanangkornchaiS.PattanasattayawongU.SamangsriN.MukthongA. (2007). Substance use among high-school students in southern Thailand: Trends over 3 years (2002-2004). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86(2-3), 167.
2.
BamacaM. Y.Umana-TaylorA. J.ShinN.AlfaroE. C. (2005). Latino adolescents’ perception of parenting behaviors and self-esteem: Examining the role of neighborhood risk. Family Relations, 54, 621-632.
3.
BarnowS.LuchtM.FreybergerH. J. (2005). Correlates of aggressive and delinquent conduct problems in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 24-39.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1985-2004). EQS for Windows, 6.1. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5.
BowenG. L.BowenN. K.CookP. (2000). Neighborhood characteristics and supportive parenting among single mothers. In FoxG. L.BensonM. L. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in family research: Vol. 2. Families, crime, and criminal justice (pp. 183-206). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
6.
BrodyG. H.GeX.CongerR.GibbonsF. X.MurryV. M.GerrardM.SimonsR. L.(2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72, 1231-1246.
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In VastaR. (Ed.), Six theories of child development (pp. 187-249). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
8.
BurtonL. M.JarrettR. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1114-1135.
9.
ByrnesH. F.ChenM.-J.MillerB. A.MaguinE. (2007). The relative importance of mothers’ and youths’ neighborhood perceptions for youth alcohol use and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 649-659.
10.
CantillonD. (2006). Community social organization, parents, and peers as mediators of perceived neighborhood block characteristics on delinquent and prosocial activities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37(1-2), 111-127.
11.
CaughyM. O. B.O’CampoP. J.MuntanerC. (2003). When being alone might be better: Neighborhood poverty, social capital, and child mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 227-237.
12.
ChamratrithirongA.RhucharoenpornpanichO.ChaiphetN.RosatiM. J.ZimmermanR.MillerB. A.. . .ByrnesH. F. (2009). Beginning the Thai Family Matters Project: An areal analysis of bad neighborhoods and adolescents’ problematic behaviours in Thailand. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 18(1), 141-158.
13.
ChuangY.-C.LiY.-S.WuY.-H.ChaoH. J. (2007). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood and individual effects on individual smoking and drinking in Taiwan. BMC Public Health, 7, 151.
14.
ChungH. L.SteinbergL. (2006). Relations between neighborhood factors, parenting behaviors, peer deviance, and delinquency among serious juvenile offenders. Dev Psychol, 42, 319-331.
15.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
16.
DahlT.CeballoR.HuertaM. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Mothers’ perceptions of poor neighborhoods as places to raise children. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 419-434.
17.
DrukkerM.BukaS. L.KaplanC.McKenzieK.Van OsJ. (2005). Social capital and young adolescents’ perceived health in different sociocultural settings. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 185-198.
18.
DrukkerM.KaplanC.FeronF.van OsJ. (2003). Children’s health-related quality of life, neighbourhood socio-economic deprivation and social capital. A contextual analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 825-841.
19.
DrukkerM.van OsJ. (2003). Mediators of neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation and quality of life. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 698-706.
20.
DuncanS. C.DuncanT. E.StryckerL. A. (2000). Risk and protective factors influencing adolescent problem behavior: A multivariate latent growth curve analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22(2), 103-109.
21.
DuncanS. C.DuncanT. E.StryckerL. A. (2002). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prevention Science, 3, 125-133.
22.
DupéréV.LacourseÉ.WillmsJ. D.VitaroF.TremblayR. E. (2007). Affiliation to youth gangs during adolescence: The interaction between childhood psychopathic tendencies and neighborhood disadvantage. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 1035-1045.
23.
ElliottD. S.AgetonS.HuizingaD.KnowlesB.CanterR. (1983). The prevalence and incidence of delinquent behavior: 1976-1980. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.
24.
ElliottD. S.WilsonW. J.HuizingaD.SampsonR. J.ElliottA.RankinB. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 389-426.
25.
EnnettS. T.FlewellingR. L.LindroothR. C.NortonE. C. (1997). School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 55-71.
26.
FalluJ.-S.JanoszM.BrièreF. N.DescheneauxA.VitaroF.TremblayR. E. (2010). Preventing disruptive boys from becoming heavy substance users during adolescence: A longitudinal study of familial and peer-related protective factors. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 1074-1082.
27.
FeinbergM. E.ChilenskiS. M.GreenbergM. T.SpothR. L.RedmondC.(2007). Community and team member factors that influence the operations phase of local prevention teams: The PROSPER Project. Prevention Science, 8, 214-226.
28.
FurstenbergF. F.Jr.HughesM. E. (1997). The influence of neighborhoods on children’s development: A theoretical perspective and a research agenda. In Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG.AberJ. L. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods (Vol. 2, pp. 23-47). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
29.
HalpernD. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
30.
HartosJ. L.PowerT. G. (1997). Mothers’ awareness of their early adolescents’ stressors: Relation between awareness and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 371-389.
31.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
32.
Institute for Social and Behavioral Research. (2000). Youth Questionnaire. The capable families and youth study. IA, US: Iowa State University.
33.
KingstonB.HuizingaD.ElliottD. S. (2009). A test of social disorganization theory in high-risk urban neighborhoods. Youth and Society, 41(1), 53-79.
34.
KreuterM. W.LezinN. (2002). Social capital theory: Implications forcommunity-based health promotion. In DiClementeR. J.CrosbyR. A.KeglerM. C.(Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 228-254). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
KubrinC. E.WeitzerR. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 374-402.
36.
LambertS. F.BrownT. L.PhillipsC. M.IalongoN. S. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of neighborhood characteristics and substance use among urban African American adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3-4), 205-218.
37.
LaserJ. A.LusterT.OshioT. (2007). Promotive and risk factors related to deviant behavior in Japanese youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1463-1480.
38.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309-337.
39.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2004). Diversity in developmental trajectories across adolescence: Neighborhood influences. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 451-486). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
40.
MillerB. A.ByrnesH. F.CuppP. K.ChamratrithirongA.RhucharoenpornpanichO.FoundkaewW.. . .ZimmermanR. (in press). Thai parenting practices, family rituals and risky adolescent behaviors: Alcohol use, cigarette use and delinquency. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health.
41.
O’NeilR.ParkeR. D.McDowellD. J. (2001). Objective and subjective features of children’s neighborhoods: Relations to parental regulatory strategies and children’s social competence. Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 132-155.
42.
PattersonG. R.Stouthamer-LoeberM. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development, 55, 1299-1307.
43.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
44.
PortesA.LandoltP. (1996). The downside of social capital. American Prospect, 26, 18-21.
45.
PutnamR. D. (1993). The prosperous community. Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
46.
PutnamR. D. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. American Prospect, 7(24), 34-38.
47.
RankinB. H.QuaneJ. M. (2002). Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: The interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth. Social Problems, 49(1), 79-100.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.EarlsF. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633-660.
50.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319-342.
51.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
52.
SeidmanE.YoshikawaH.RobertsA.Chesir-TeranD.AllenL.FriedmanJ. L.AberJ. L. (1998). Structural and experiential neighborhood contexts, developmental stage, and antisocial behavior among urban adolescents in poverty. Developmental Psychopathology, 10, 259-281.
53.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
TakahashiL. M.MagalongM. G. (2008). Disruptive social capital: (Un)healthy socio-spatial interactions among Filipino men living with HIV/AIDS. Health Place, 14, 182-197.
55.
TaylorJ.MaloneS.IaconoW. G.McGueM. (2002). Development of substance dependence in two delinquency subgroups and nondelinquents from a male twin sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 386-393.
TragesserS. L.BeauvaisF.SwaimR. C.EdwardsR. W.OettingE. R. (2007). Parental monitoring, peer drug involvement, and marijuana use across three ethnicities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 670.
58.
van den BreeM. B. M.PickworthW. B. (2005). Risk factors predicting changes in marijuana involvement in teenagers. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 311-319.
