This study examines the separate relationships of public housing residence and subsidized housing residence to adolescent health risk behavior. Data include 2,530 adolescents aged 14 to 19 who were children of the National the Longitudinal Study of Youth. The author use stratified propensity methods to compare the behaviors of each group—subsidized housing residents and public housing residents—to a matched control group of teens receiving no housing assistance. The results reveal no significant relationship between public housing residence and violence, heavy alcohol/marijuana use, or other drug use. However, subsidized housing residents have significantly lower rates of violence and hard drug use, and marginally lower rates of heavy marijuana/alcohol use. The results indicate that the consistent, positive effect of vouchers in the current literature is not due to a lower standard among the typical comparison group: public housing. Future studies should focus on conceptualizing and analyzing the protective effect of vouchers beyond comparisons to public housing environments.
BeckerS.IchinoA. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2, 358-377.
2.
BonastiaC. (2000). Why did affirmative action in housing fail during the Nixon era? Exploring the “institutional homes” of social policies. Social Problems, 47, 523-542.
3.
Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG.AberJ. (1997). Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4.
CochranW. (1968). The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 24, 295-313.
5.
CohenL.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
6.
CrumpJ. R. (2003). The end of public housing as we know it: Public housing policy, labor regulation and the U.S. city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 179-187.
7.
DanielsonM. (1976). The politics of exclusionary zoning in suburbia. Political Science Quarterly, 91(1), 1-18.
8.
DaviesG. (2006). Crime, neighborhood, and public housing. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly.
9.
de Souza BriggsX. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 177-221.
10.
DuncanG.LudwigJ. (2000). Can housing vouchers help poor children?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
DuRantR.AltmanD.WolfsonM.BarkinS.KreiterS.KrowchukD. (2000). Exposure to violence and victimization, depression, substance use, and the use of violence by young adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics, 137(5), 707-713.
12.
ElliottD.WilsonW.HuizingaD.SampsonR.ElliottA.RankinB. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 389.
13.
FaganJ.DaviesG. (2004). The natural history of neighborhood violence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(2), 127.
14.
GobillonL.SelodH.ZenouY. (2007). The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Studies, 44, 2401-2428.
15.
GoeringJ.FeinsJ. (2003). Choosing a better life: Evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
16.
GoodP.HardinJ. (2009). Common errors in statistics (and how to avoid them). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17.
GriffithsE.TitaG. (2009). Homicide in and around public housing: Is public housing a hotbed, a magnet, or a generator of violence for the surrounding community?Social Problems, 56, 474-493.
HollowayS.McNultyT. (2003). Contingent urban geographies of violent crime: Racial segregation and the impact of public housing in Atlanta. Urban Geography, 24, 187-211.
20.
IrelandT.ThornberryT.LoeberR. (2003). Violence among adolescents living in public housing: A two-site analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(1), 36.
21.
KhadduriJ. (2001). Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want?Cityscape, 5(2), 69-84.
22.
KlingJ.LudwigJ.KatzL. (2005). Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: Evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 87-130.
23.
KubrinC.WeitzerR. (2003). Retaliatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50, 157-180.
24.
LudwigJ.DuncanG.HirschfieldP. (2001). Urban poverty and juvenile crime: Evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 655-679.
25.
MacDonaldJ.GoverA. (2005). Concentrated disadvantage and youth-on-youth homicide: Assessing the structural covariates over time. Homicide Studies, 9(1), 30.
26.
MasseyD.DentonN. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
MuthénB.MuthenL. (2000). The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 290-300.
28.
PalmerC.ZierschA.ArthursonK.BaumF. (2004). Challenging the stigma of public housing: Preliminary findings from a qualitative study in South Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 22, 411-426.
29.
PopkinS.BuronL.LevyD.CunninghamM. (2000). The Gautreaux legacy: What might mixed-income and dispersal strategies mean for the poorest public housing tenants?Housing Policy Debate, 11, 911-942.
30.
PopkinS.CunninghamM.BurtM. (2005). Public housing transformation and the hard to house. Housing Policy Debate, 16(1), 1-24.
31.
PyleG. (1976). Spatial and temporal aspects of crime in Cleveland, Ohio. American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 175-196.
32.
RodneyH.MupierR. (1997). African-American youth in public housing showing low alcohol and drug use. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 6(4), 55-73.
33.
RossC.MirowskyJ. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 258-276.
34.
RubinD. (2006). Matched sampling for causal effects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SampsonR.LauritsenJ. (1994). Violent victimization and offending: Individual-, situational-, and community-level risk factors. In ReissA.RothJ. (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence: Consequences and control, 1-115.
36.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
37.
SchwartzA.TajbakhshK. (2001). Mixed-income housing as social policy: The case for diminished expectations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Los Angeles, CA.
38.
SmallM.NewmanK. (2001). Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 23-45.
39.
TitusM. (2007). Detecting selection bias, using propensity score matching, and estimating treatment effects: An application to the private returns to a master’s degree. Research in Higher Education, 48, 487-521.
40.
UdayakumarS. P.NelsonL. (1999). Concentrated poverty: Causes, effects, and solutions. Minneapolis: Institute on Race & Poverty, University of Minnesota School of Law.
41.
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development. (1994). Survey of public housing and residents: Crime and crime prevention in public housing. Research Triangle Park, NC: Author.
42.
U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2004). Predicting heavy drug use: Results of a longitudinal study, youth characteristics describing and predicting heavy drug use by adults. Retrieved from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS79884
43.
ValdezA.KaplanC. D.CurtisR. L.Jr. (2007). Aggressive crime, alcohol and drug use, and concentrated poverty in 24 U.S. urban areas. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33, 595-603.
44.
VeyJ. S. (2007). Restoring prosperity: The state role in revitalizing America’s older industrial cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.
45.
WilliamsC.ScheierL. M.BotvinG. J.BakerE.MillerN. (1997). Risk factors for alcohol use among inner-city minority youth: A comparative analysis of youth living in public and conventional housing. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 6(1), 69-89.
46.
WilsonW. J. (1978). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
